World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
UK
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
102
Citations
61741
World Ranking
331
National Ranking
21

Ian Horrocks publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian Horrocks sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 468 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ian Horrocks D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian Horrocks sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 102 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2012 - Member of Academia Europaea
  • 2011 - Fellow of the Royal Society, United Kingdom

Overview

Ian Horrocks is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the field of Computer Science, with a significant focus on Artificial Intelligence. The work consistently addresses key topics including Semantic Web and Ontologies, Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies, Topic Modeling, Natural Language Processing Techniques, Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services, Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge, as well as Advanced Text Analysis Techniques.

The scientist has published extensively, contributing to diverse venues with repeated appearances in arXiv (Cornell University) and Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). Other notable publication venues include Semantic Web, Artificial Intelligence, and Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

Ian Horrocks' recent papers cover a range of subjects within ontology and knowledge graph research. These include:

  • OWL2Vec*: embedding of OWL ontologies, 2021, Machine Learning
  • Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2024, 2025, City Research Online (City University London)
  • Zero-Shot and Few-Shot Learning With Knowledge Graphs: A Comprehensive Survey, 2023, Proceedings of the IEEE
  • Contextual semantic embeddings for ontology subsumption prediction, 2023, World Wide Web
  • DeepOnto: A Python package for ontology engineering with deep learning, 2024, Semantic Web

Among frequent co-authors are Jiaoyan Chen, Yuan He, Hang Dong, Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz, and Bernardo Cuenca Grau, with collaboration counts ranging from 9 to 41 joint works. Such collaborations illustrate active engagement with researchers focused on related subjects and methodologies.

The scientist's research subjects align with several subfields of study including Molecular Biology, Information Systems, Computer Networks and Communications, and Computational Theory and Mathematics, reflecting interdisciplinary approaches within their work.

Ian Horrocks has been recognized with distinctions including the Member of Academia Europaea in 2012 and Fellow of the Royal Society, United Kingdom in 2011, indicating acknowledgment within the scientific community for their contributions.

Best Publications

  • The Semantic Web

    Unknown

  • OWL Web Ontology Language - Reference

    M. Dean;A.T. Schreiber;S. Bechofer;F.A.H. van Harmelen

  • Description Logic Programs: Combining Logic Programs with Description Logic

    Benjamin Grosof;Ian Horrocks;Raphael Volz;Stefan Decker

  • A Software Framework for Matchmaking Based on Semantic Web Technology

    Lei Li;Ian Horrocks

  • From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: the making of a Web Ontology Language

    Ian Horrocks;Peter F. Patel-Schneider;Frank van Harmelen

  • FaCT++ description logic reasoner: system description

    Dmitry Tsarkov;Ian Horrocks

  • The Semantic Web: the roles of XML and RDF

    S. Decker;S. Melnik;F. van Harmelen;D. Fensel

  • OIL: an ontology infrastructure for the Semantic Web

    D. Fensel;F. van Harmelen;I. Horrocks;D.L. McGuinness

  • The even more irresistible SROIQ

    Ian Horrocks;Oliver Kutz;Ulrike Sattler

  • OWL 2: The next step for OWL

    Bernardo Cuenca Grau;Ian Horrocks;Boris Motik;Bijan Parsia

  • OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: structural specification and functional-style syntax

    B. Motik;P.F. Patel-Schneider;B. Parsia;C. Bock

  • The Semantic Web — ISWC 2002

    Ian Horrocks;James Hendler

  • Ontologies and the semantic web

    Ian Horrocks

  • Reducing OWL entailment to description logic satisfiability

    Ian Horrocks;Peter Patel-Schneider

  • Description Logics as Ontology Languages for the Semantic Web

    Franz Baader;Ian Horrocks;Ulrike Sattler

  • Practical Reasoning for Expressive Description Logics

    Ian Horrocks;Ulrike Sattler;Stephan Tobies

  • HermiT: An OWL 2 Reasoner

    Birte Glimm;Ian Horrocks;Boris Motik;Giorgos Stoilos

  • OilEd: A Reason-able Ontology Editor for the Semantic Web

    Sean Bechhofer;Ian Horrocks;Carole A. Goble;Robert Stevens

  • HermiT: A Highly-Efficient OWL Reasoner.

    Robert D. C. Shearer;Boris Motik;Ian Horrocks

  • OIL in a Nutshell

    Dieter Fensel;Ian Horrocks;Frank van Harmelen;Stefan Decker

  • Description logics for the semantic web

    Franz Baader;Ian Horrocks;Ulrike Sattler

Frequent Co-Authors

Bernardo Cuenca Grau
Bernardo Cuenca Grau University of Oxford
Boris Motik
Boris Motik University of Oxford
Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz
Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz City, University of London
Ulrike Sattler
Ulrike Sattler University of Manchester
Evgeny Kharlamov
Evgeny Kharlamov University of Oslo
Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Peter F. Patel-Schneider Palo Alto Research Center
Jeff Z. Pan
Jeff Z. Pan University of Edinburgh
Dieter Fensel
Dieter Fensel University of Innsbruck
Frank van Harmelen
Frank van Harmelen Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Michel C. A. Klein
Michel C. A. Klein Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in the USA can open many doors for a career in computer science or related fields. If affordability is a concern, consider programs highlighted among the most affordable online doctoral programs, which let you pursue advanced study at a lower cost.

For those who want a faster path to a leadership or educational role, accelerated edd programs online offer a way to earn a doctoral degree in education much quicker than traditional options. This can be an ideal route for IT instructors or academic leaders.

If you're just starting out or seeking foundational skills, associate-level degrees can be completed fast—some of the associate degree online programs offer flexible, short-term study options that lead to entry-level jobs in tech.

Additionally, tech careers often intersect with business. Specialized online business degrees can equip you with management and entrepreneurial skills to help bridge the gap between technology and business leadership.

Best Scientists Citing Ian Horrocks

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles