What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Programming language
- Artificial intelligence
- Algorithm
Description logic, Ontology, Theoretical computer science, Semantic Web and Artificial intelligence are his primary areas of study.
His Description logic study which covers Reduction that intersects with Decidability.
His work is dedicated to discovering how Ontology, Ontology are connected with Knowledge engineering and other disciplines.
His Theoretical computer science research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Fragment, Conjunctive query and Resolution.
His Semantic Web research is classified as research in World Wide Web.
His Artificial intelligence research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Deductive database, Programming language and Natural language processing.
His most cited work include:
- OWL 2: The next step for OWL (693 citations)
- OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: structural specification and functional-style syntax (538 citations)
- Query Answering for OWL-DL with rules (488 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Boris Motik spends much of his time researching Theoretical computer science, Description logic, Ontology, Web Ontology Language and Semantic Web.
His Theoretical computer science research incorporates elements of Axiom and Set.
His Description logic study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Ontology language, Knowledge representation and reasoning, Resolution, Extension and Algorithm.
His studies in Ontology integrate themes in fields like Ontology and Semantic reasoner.
His Web Ontology Language research incorporates themes from Programming language, Conjunctive query and Interoperability.
World Wide Web and Information retrieval are the main topics of his Semantic Web study.
He most often published in these fields:
- Theoretical computer science (39.20%)
- Description logic (35.80%)
- Ontology (28.98%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?
- Theoretical computer science (39.20%)
- Datalog (21.59%)
- RDF (13.64%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary areas of investigation include Theoretical computer science, Datalog, RDF, Extension and Undecidable problem.
His work carried out in the field of Theoretical computer science brings together such families of science as Transitive relation, Query language, Relation, Graph and Modular design.
Boris Motik has included themes like Discrete mathematics, Arithmetic function, Description logic and Resolution in his Extension study.
Resolution is a subfield of Artificial intelligence that Boris Motik tackles.
His work investigates the relationship between Undecidable problem and topics such as Logical consequence that intersect with problems in Decidability, Negation and Fragment.
Boris Motik has researched Representation in several fields, including SPARQL and Information retrieval.
Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Benchmarking the Chase (45 citations)
- ArmaTweet : Detecting Events by Semantic Tweet Analysis (16 citations)
- Distributed RDF Query Answering with Dynamic Data Exchange (16 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Programming language
- Artificial intelligence
- Algorithm
Boris Motik mainly focuses on Theoretical computer science, RDF, SPARQL, Extension and Graph.
Boris Motik specializes in Theoretical computer science, namely Reachability.
His RDF Schema study in the realm of RDF interacts with subjects such as Query plan and RDF query language.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Software deployment, Knowledge management, Encoding, Field and Semantic technology.
His Extension research includes elements of Resolution, Description logic, Artificial intelligence, Undecidable problem and EXPTIME.
In his study, Information retrieval is strongly linked to Data management, which falls under the umbrella field of Data exchange.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
