World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Matthias F. Geiger publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Matthias F. Geiger between 2010 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Matthias F. Geiger published across 16 years, from 2010 to 2025, averaging 5.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2019. 3 of the 83 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2010 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2019. 2010: 3 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 5 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 1 publication
2010 2025

83 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Matthias F. Geiger: publications per year, 2010 to 2025
Year Publications
2010 3
2011 0
2012 2
2013 1
2014 5
2015 5
2016 9
2017 9
2018 10
2019 11
2020 4
2021 8
2022 10
2023 3
2024 2
2025 1
Total 83
Download as CSV

Matthias F. Geiger publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthias F. Geiger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 37–41 to 531+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 333. Most scientists, 333, have 97–101 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more. 37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37–41 publications 531+

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Ecology and Evolution scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 8,381 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists
37–41 2
42–46 9
47–51 10
52–56 31
57–61 56
62–66 91
67–71 92
72–76 127
77–81 173
82–86 236
87–91 227
92–96 240
97–101 333
102–106 280
107–111 300
112–116 285
117–121 305
122–126 287
127–131 278
132–136 289
137–141 273
142–146 262
147–151 246
152–156 235
157–161 205
162–166 199
167–171 174
172–176 164
177–181 173
182–186 189
187–191 170
192–196 139
197–201 128
202–206 117
207–211 115
212–216 107
217–221 124
222–226 81
227–231 82
232–236 85
237–241 75
242–246 66
247–251 81
252–256 69
257–261 70
262–266 55
267–271 64
272–276 49
277–281 48
282–286 44
287–291 45
292–296 36
297–301 39
302–306 38
307–311 30
312–316 34
317–321 25
322–326 22
327–331 28
332–336 30
337–341 22
342–346 30
347–351 26
352–356 22
357–361 29
362–366 21
367–371 12
372–376 18
377–381 17
382–386 13
387–391 21
392–396 13
397–401 10
402–406 15
407–411 8
412–416 9
417–421 8
422–426 4
427–431 10
432–436 10
437–441 5
442–446 4
447–451 10
452–456 2
457–461 4
462–466 7
467–471 7
472–476 6
477–481 6
482–486 3
487–491 3
492–496 4
497–501 4
502–506 8
507–511 5
512–516 4
517–521 5
522–526 4
527–530 5
531+ 100
Download as CSV

Matthias F. Geiger D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthias F. Geiger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 92 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 121+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 280. Most scientists, 280, have 40 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more. 30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Ecology and Evolution scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 8,381 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists
30 95
31 123
32 191
33 245
34 252
35 244
36 249
37 244
38 254
39 254
40 280
41 274
42 266
43 233
44 248
45 208
46 201
47 213
48 207
49 172
50 209
51 199
52 153
53 169
54 163
55 148
56 120
57 146
58 137
59 140
60 104
61 119
62 118
63 99
64 77
65 100
66 86
67 83
68 75
69 94
70 57
71 68
72 59
73 63
74 66
75 60
76 42
77 49
78 39
79 37
80 43
81 41
82 45
83 34
84 40
85 35
86 55
87 24
88 24
89 30
90 23
91 25
92 27
93 27
94 13
95 23
96 12
97 14
98 19
99 16
100 14
101 5
102 21
103 16
104 10
105 7
106 7
107 7
108 6
109 9
110 11
111 12
112 9
113 7
114 3
115 8
116 5
117 11
118 4
119 2
120 5
121+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2009 - Hellman Fellow

Overview

Matthias F. Geiger is affiliated with the Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change in Germany. Their research focuses primarily on environmental sciences, with significant contributions in biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and agricultural and biological sciences. Key subfields of their work include molecular biology, aquatic science, ecology, nature and landscape conservation, and genetics.

The scientist's publication record includes research on the identification and quantification in food, fish biology and ecology studies, environmental DNA in biodiversity studies, genetic diversity and population structure, fish ecology and management studies, species distribution and climate change, and environmental and biological research in conflict zones.

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Jörg Freyhof
  • Çüneyt Kaya
  • Ameli Kirse
  • Iraj Hashemzadeh Segherloo
  • Boris Levin

Matthias F. Geiger has published multiple papers in several venues, with notable frequent publications in:

  • Zootaxa
  • Global Biodiversity Information Facility
  • Basic and Applied Ecology
  • Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
  • Ecological Indicators

Recent papers include:

  • "Towards a multisensor station for automated biodiversity monitoring" (2022) in Basic and Applied Ecology
  • "A genomic perspective on an old question: Salmo trouts or Salmo trutta (Teleostei: Salmonidae)?" (2021) in Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
  • "DNA metabarcoding of stream invertebrates reveals spatio-temporal variation but consistent status class assessments in a natural and urban river" (2020) in Ecological Indicators
  • "Adding DNA barcoding to stream monitoring protocols - What's the additional value and congruence between morphological and molecular identification approaches?" (2021) in PLoS ONE
  • "Coverage and quality of DNA barcode references for Central and Northern European Odonata" (2021) in PeerJ

Matthias F. Geiger was awarded the Hellman Fellow recognition in 2009.

Best Publications

  • DNA barcode reference libraries for the monitoring of aquatic biota in Europe: Gap-analysis and recommendations for future work.

    Hannah Weigand;Arne J Beermann;Fedor Čiampor;Filipe O. Costa

  • Spatial heterogeneity in the Mediterranean Biodiversity Hotspot affects barcoding accuracy of its freshwater fishes.

    M. F. Geiger;F. Herder;M. T. Monaghan;V. Almada

  • Why We Need Sustainable Networks Bridging Countries, Disciplines, Cultures and Generations for Aquatic Biomonitoring 2.0: A Perspective Derived From the DNAqua-Net COST Action

    Florian Leese;Agnes Bouchez;Kessy Abarenkov;Florian Altermatt

  • Testing the Global Malaise Trap Program – How well does the current barcode reference library identify flying insects in Germany?

    Matthias F. Geiger;Jerome Moriniere;Axel Hausmann;Gerhard Haszprunar

  • Photography-based taxonomy is inadequate, unnecessary, and potentially harmful for biological sciences

    Luis M.P. Ceríaco;Luis M.P. Ceríaco;Eliécer E. Gutiérrez;Eliécer E. Gutiérrez;Alain Dubois;Cristian Simón Abdala

  • A DNA barcode library for 5,200 German flies and midges (Insecta: Diptera) and its implications for metabarcoding-based biomonitoring.

    Jérôme Morinière;Michael Balke;Dieter Doczkal;Matthias F Geiger

  • Molecular diversity of Germany's freshwater fishes and lampreys assessed by DNA barcoding.

    Thomas Knebelsberger;Andreas R. Dunz;Dirk Neumann;Matthias F. Geiger

  • How to tackle the molecular species inventory for an industrialized nation-lessons from the first phase of the German Barcode of Life initiative GBOL (2012-2015).

    Matthias F Geiger;Jonas J. Astrin;Thomas Borsch;Ulrich Burkhardt

  • DNA metabarcoding from sample fixative as a quick and voucher-preserving biodiversity assessment method

    Vera M.A. Zizka;Florian Leese;Bianca Peinert;Matthias F. Geiger

  • Review of the Oxynoemacheilus tigris group with the description of two new species from the Euphrates drainage (Teleostei: Nemacheilidae).

    Joerg Freyhof;Cuneyt Kaya;Davut Turan;Matthias Geiger

  • Alien invasion in Wallace's Dreamponds: records of the hybridogenic "flowerhorn" cichlid in Lake Matano, with an annotated checklist of fish species introduced to the Malili Lakes system in Sulawesi

    Fabian Herder;Ulrich K. Schliewen;Matthias F. Geiger;Renny K. Hadiaty

  • Sasanidus, a new generic name for Noemacheilus kermanshahensis Bănărescu & Nalbant, with discussion of Ilamnemacheilus and Schistura (Teleostei; Nemacheilidae).

    Jörg Freyhof;Matthias F. Geiger;Kiavash Golzarianpour;Rahman Patimar

  • Eidinemacheilus proudlovei , a new subterranean loach from Iraqi Kurdistan (Teleostei; Nemacheilidae)

    Jörg Freyhof;Younis Sabir Abdullah;Korsh Ararat;Hamad Ibrahim

  • Generic assignment of Leuciscus kurui Bogutskaya from the upper Tigris drainage, and a replacement name for Alburnus kurui Mangit & Yerli (Teleostei: Leuciscidae)

    Jörg Freyhof;Cüneyt Kaya;Esra Bayçelebi;Matthias Geiger

  • A genomic perspective on an old question: Salmo trouts or Salmo trutta (Teleostei: Salmonidae)?

    Iraj Hashemzadeh Segherloo;Jörg Freyhof;Patrick Berrebi;Anne-Laure Ferchaud

  • Barbus anatolicus, a new barbel from the Kızılırmak and Yeşilırmak River drainages in northern Anatolia (Teleostei: Cyprinidae).

    Davut Turan;Cüneyt Kaya;Matthias Geiger;Jörg Freyhof

  • Oxynoemacheilus zarzianus , a new loach from the Lesser Zab River drainage in Iraqi Kurdistan (Teleostei: Nemacheilidae).

    Jörg Freyhof;Matthias Geiger

  • Oxynoemacheilus phasicus , a new nemacheilid loach from the eastern Black Sea basin with some remarks on other Caucasian Oxynoemacheilus (Teleostei: Nemacheilidae)

    Jörg Freyhof;Cüneyt Kaya;Giorgi Epitashvili;Matthias F. Geiger

  • Review of the genus Cobitis in the Middle East, with the description of eight new species (Teleostei: Cobitidae).

    Jörg Freyhof;Esra Bayçelebi;Matthias Geiger

  • Aphanius kruppi , a new killifish from Oman with comments on the A. dispar species group (Cyprinodontiformes: Aphaniidae)

    Jörg Freyhof;Anton Weissenbacher;Matthias Geiger

Frequent Co-Authors

Jörg Freyhof
Jörg Freyhof Leibniz Association
Florian Leese
Florian Leese University of Duisburg-Essen
Michał Grabowski
Michał Grabowski University of Łódź
Filipe O. Costa
Filipe O. Costa University of Minho
Agnès Bouchez
Agnès Bouchez Université Savoie Mont Blanc
Vladimir Pešić
Vladimir Pešić University of Montenegro
Annie Machordom
Annie Machordom Spanish National Research Council
Paul D. N. Hebert
Paul D. N. Hebert University of Guelph
Elisabeth Haring
Elisabeth Haring Natural History Museum Vienna

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Ecology and Evolution, related online degrees can open pathways into a diverse range of fields focused on people, health, and communities. Many students consider advancing their education through flexible and affordable options, such as the cheapest masters in counseling, which prepares graduates to support individuals’ wellbeing in schools or clinical settings.

Those intrigued by behavioral or mental health may also explore clinical psychologist online programs. These programs are ideal for those pursuing assessment, research, or therapeutic careers in human environments and populations.

For a broader social science background, students sometimes begin with an online human services degree. This path can quickly lead to entry-level jobs supporting people, while providing foundational skills valuable in ecological education, advocacy, or public health.

Changing careers is also possible; for example, educators wanting to specialize may wonder: can a teacher become a speech pathologist? Short answer—yes, often through targeted online graduate programs.

These options highlight how online degrees can complement your interests in Ecology and Evolution, connecting scientific understanding with real-world human impact and services.

Best Scientists Citing Matthias F. Geiger

Trending Scientists