World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
56
Citations
10397
World Ranking
2860
National Ranking
119

Agnès Bouchez publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Agnès Bouchez sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 159 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Agnès Bouchez D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Agnès Bouchez sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Agnès Bouchez is affiliated with Université Savoie Mont Blanc in France. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with an extensive body of work in Ecology, Molecular Biology, and Biomaterials. Other areas of interest include Pollution and Ecological Modeling.

The main topics that characterize their work comprise Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies, Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology, and Diatoms and Algae Research. Additional areas they cover include Protist diversity and phylogeny, Identification and Quantification in Food, Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology, and Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies.

The scientist has co-authored publications frequently with several researchers, notably Frédéric Rimet (35 publications), Valentin Vasselon (26 publications), Teofana Chonova (15 publications), Jan Pawłowski (12 publications), and François Keck (9 publications).

Agnès Bouchez has published in multiple venues, with recurrent contributions to The Science of The Total Environment and ARPHA Conference Abstracts, each with 9 publications. Other common publication venues include Metabarcoding and Metagenomics (6 publications), Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (5 publications), and Molecular Ecology (3 publications).

Several recent papers by Bouchez and collaborators highlight their research trajectory:

  • Ecosystems monitoring powered by environmental genomics: A review of current strategies with an implementation roadmap, 2020, Molecular Ecology
  • Expanding ecological assessment by integrating microorganisms into routine freshwater biomonitoring, 2020, Water Research
  • Environmental DNA metabarcoding for benthic monitoring: A review of sediment sampling and DNA extraction methods, 2021, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Key Questions for Next-Generation Biomonitoring, 2020, Frontiers in Environmental Science
  • Monitoring the ecological status of rivers with diatom eDNA metabarcoding: A comparison of taxonomic markers and analytical approaches for the inference of a molecular diatom index, 2020, Molecular Ecology

They have authored books published by Pensoft Publishers and Frontiers Media. Notable titles include A practical guide to DNA-based methods for biodiversity assessment (2021) and A Next-Generation of Biomonitoring to Detect Global Ecosystem Change (2020).

Best Publications

  • The future of biotic indices in the ecogenomic era: Integrating (e)DNA metabarcoding in biological assessment of aquatic ecosystems

    Jan Pawlowski;Mary Kelly-Quinn;Florian Altermatt;Laure Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil

  • DNA barcode reference libraries for the monitoring of aquatic biota in Europe: Gap-analysis and recommendations for future work.

    Hannah Weigand;Arne J Beermann;Fedor Čiampor;Filipe O. Costa

  • phylosignal: an R package to measure, test, and explore the phylogenetic signal.

    François Keck;Frédéric Rimet;Frédéric Rimet;Agnès Bouchez;Agnès Bouchez;Alain Franc

  • Implementation options for DNA-based identification into ecological status assessment under the European Water Framework Directive.

    Daniel Hering;Angel Borja;J.Iwan Jones;Didier Pont

  • Life-forms, cell-sizes and ecological guilds of diatoms in European rivers

    Frederic Rimet;Frederic Rimet;Agnès Bouchez;Agnès Bouchez

  • Using diatom life-forms and ecological guilds to assess organic pollution and trophic level in rivers: a case study of rivers in south-eastern France

    Vincent Berthon;Agnès Bouchez;Frédéric Rimet

  • Ecosystems monitoring powered by environmental genomics: a review of current strategies with an implementation roadmap

    Tristan Cordier;Laura Alonso-Sáez;Laure Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil;Eva Aylagas

  • Next-generation sequencing to inventory taxonomic diversity in eukaryotic communities: a test for freshwater diatoms.

    L. Kermarrec;A. Franc;A. Franc;F. Rimet;P. Chaumeil;P. Chaumeil

  • Assessing ecological status with diatoms DNA metabarcoding: Scaling-up on a WFD monitoring network (Mayotte island, France)

    Valentin Vasselon;Frédéric Rimet;Kálmán Tapolczai;Agnès Bouchez

  • Expanding ecological assessment by integrating microorganisms into routine freshwater biomonitoring

    M. Sagova-Mareckova;J. Boenigk;A. Bouchez;K. Cermakova

  • DNAqua-Net: Developing new genetic tools for bioassessment and monitoring of aquatic ecosystems in Europe

    Florian Leese;Florian Altermatt;Agnès Bouchez;Torbjørn Ekrem

  • Marker-assisted introgression of favorable alleles at quantitative trait loci between maize elite lines.

    Agnès Bouchez;Mathilde Causse;André Gallais

  • Environmental DNA metabarcoding for benthic monitoring: A review of sediment sampling and DNA extraction methods.

    J. Pawlowski;J. Pawlowski;K. Bruce;K. Panksep;K. Panksep;F.I. Aguirre

  • Why We Need Sustainable Networks Bridging Countries, Disciplines, Cultures and Generations for Aquatic Biomonitoring 2.0: A Perspective Derived From the DNAqua-Net COST Action

    Florian Leese;Agnes Bouchez;Kessy Abarenkov;Florian Altermatt

  • A practical guide to DNA-based methods for biodiversity assessment

    Kat Bruce;Rosetta Blackman;Sarah J. Bourlat;Ann Micaela Hellstrom

  • Use of diatom life-forms and ecological guilds to assess pesticide contamination in rivers: Lotic mesocosm approaches

    Frédéric Rimet;Agnès Bouchez

  • A next-generation sequencing approach to river biomonitoring using benthic diatoms

    Lenaïg Kermarrec;Alain Franc;Alain Franc;Frédéric Rimet;Philippe Chaumeil;Philippe Chaumeil

  • Diat.barcode, an open-access curated barcode library for diatoms

    Frédéric Rimet;Evgenuy Gusev;Maria Kahlert;Martyn G. Kelly

  • Freshwater biomonitoring in the Information Age

    François Keck;François Keck;Valentin Vasselon;Kálmán Tapolczai;Frédéric Rimet

  • Biomonitoring river diatoms: Implications of taxonomic resolution

    Frédéric Rimet;Agnès Bouchez

  • Pioneer marine biofilms on artificial surfaces including antifouling coatings immersed in two contrasting French Mediterranean coast sites

    Jean-François Briand;Ikram Djeridi;Dominique Jamet;Stéphane Coupé

  • Responses of chronically contaminated biofilms to short pulses of diuron. An experimental study simulating flooding events in a small river.

    Ahmed Tlili;Ursula Dorigo;Bernard Montuelle;Christelle Margoum

  • Ecosystems Monitoring Powered by Environmental Genomics: A Review of Current Strategies with An Implementation Roadmap

    Tristan Cordier;Laura Alonso Sáez;Laure Apotheloz-Perret-Gentil;Eva Aylagas

Frequent Co-Authors

Frédéric Rimet
Frédéric Rimet Université Savoie Mont Blanc
Bernard Montuelle
Bernard Montuelle INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Jan Pawlowski
Jan Pawlowski Heidelberg University
Florian Leese
Florian Leese University of Duisburg-Essen
Martyn Kelly
Martyn Kelly Durham University
David G. Mann
David G. Mann Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh
Jean-François Humbert
Jean-François Humbert INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Gábor Várbíró
Gábor Várbíró Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Daniel Hering
Daniel Hering University of Duisburg-Essen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution opens the door to diverse online degrees and academic opportunities across the USA. Many students now choose to attend non profit universities for accredited online programs, offering quality education and flexible schedules that fit busy lifestyles.

For those balancing service commitments, military friendly colleges provide tailored support and accessible resources, making online study feasible for active-duty personnel and veterans alike.

Many students interested in social, environmental, or psychological aspects of ecology pursue interdisciplinary fields. The best online msw programs prepare graduates for socially driven careers in sustainability, community outreach, and environmental advocacy.

Fast-track options such as accelerated master's in psychology empower students to quickly gain credentials relevant to research, conservation, and ecological consulting careers.

Whether you are seeking an online undergraduate, master’s, or interdisciplinary pathway, these flexible programs can help launch rewarding careers in ecology, environmental policy, education, or counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Agnès Bouchez

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles