World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
55
Citations
9513
World Ranking
3012
National Ranking
125

Frédéric Rimet publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frédéric Rimet sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 167 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Frédéric Rimet D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frédéric Rimet sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frédéric Rimet is affiliated with Université Savoie Mont Blanc in France and has contributed extensively to the field of environmental science. Their research focuses particularly on ecology, biomaterials, molecular biology, environmental chemistry, and oceanography.

The scientist's work covers main topics such as:

  • Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
  • Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Diatoms and Algae Research
  • Protist Diversity and Phylogeny
  • Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Identification and Quantification in Food
  • Freshwater Macroinvertebrate Diversity and Ecology

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Agnès Bouchez
  • Valentin Vasselon
  • Isabelle Domaizon
  • Rosa Trobajo
  • Maria Kahlert

Throughout their career, Frédéric Rimet has published in several scholarly venues, including:

  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • ARPHA Conference Abstracts
  • Metabarcoding and Metagenomics
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Ecological Indicators

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Frédéric Rimet include:

  • The Observatory on LAkes (OLA) database: Sixty years of environmental data accessible to the public, 2020, Journal of Limnology
  • Monitoring the ecological status of rivers with diatom eDNA metabarcoding: A comparison of taxonomic markers and analytical approaches for the inference of a molecular diatom index, 2020, Molecular Ecology
  • Evaluation and sensitivity analysis of diatom DNA metabarcoding for WFD bioassessment of Mediterranean rivers, 2020, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Ripe for reassessment: A synthesis of available molecular data for the speciose diatom family Bacillariaceae, 2020, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
  • A taxonomy-free approach based on machine learning to assess the quality of rivers with diatoms, 2020, The Science of The Total Environment

Best Publications

  • The future of biotic indices in the ecogenomic era: Integrating (e)DNA metabarcoding in biological assessment of aquatic ecosystems

    Jan Pawlowski;Mary Kelly-Quinn;Florian Altermatt;Laure Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil

  • DNA barcode reference libraries for the monitoring of aquatic biota in Europe: Gap-analysis and recommendations for future work.

    Hannah Weigand;Arne J Beermann;Fedor Čiampor;Filipe O. Costa

  • phylosignal: an R package to measure, test, and explore the phylogenetic signal.

    François Keck;Frédéric Rimet;Frédéric Rimet;Agnès Bouchez;Agnès Bouchez;Alain Franc

  • Life-forms, cell-sizes and ecological guilds of diatoms in European rivers

    Frederic Rimet;Frederic Rimet;Agnès Bouchez;Agnès Bouchez

  • Using diatom life-forms and ecological guilds to assess organic pollution and trophic level in rivers: a case study of rivers in south-eastern France

    Vincent Berthon;Agnès Bouchez;Frédéric Rimet

  • Recent views on river pollution and diatoms

    Frédéric Rimet

  • Next-generation sequencing to inventory taxonomic diversity in eukaryotic communities: a test for freshwater diatoms.

    L. Kermarrec;A. Franc;A. Franc;F. Rimet;P. Chaumeil;P. Chaumeil

  • Assessing ecological status with diatoms DNA metabarcoding: Scaling-up on a WFD monitoring network (Mayotte island, France)

    Valentin Vasselon;Frédéric Rimet;Kálmán Tapolczai;Agnès Bouchez

  • DNAqua-Net: Developing new genetic tools for bioassessment and monitoring of aquatic ecosystems in Europe

    Florian Leese;Florian Altermatt;Agnès Bouchez;Torbjørn Ekrem

  • Determination of the biological diatom index (IBD NF T 90-354): results of an intercomparison exercise

    Jean Prygiel;Patrice Carpentier;Salomé Almeida;Michel Coste

  • Use of diatom life-forms and ecological guilds to assess pesticide contamination in rivers: Lotic mesocosm approaches

    Frédéric Rimet;Agnès Bouchez

  • A next-generation sequencing approach to river biomonitoring using benthic diatoms

    Lenaïg Kermarrec;Alain Franc;Alain Franc;Frédéric Rimet;Philippe Chaumeil;Philippe Chaumeil

  • Diat.barcode, an open-access curated barcode library for diatoms

    Frédéric Rimet;Evgenuy Gusev;Maria Kahlert;Martyn G. Kelly

  • Freshwater biomonitoring in the Information Age

    François Keck;François Keck;Valentin Vasselon;Kálmán Tapolczai;Frédéric Rimet

  • Biomonitoring river diatoms: Implications of taxonomic resolution

    Frédéric Rimet;Agnès Bouchez

  • Pioneer marine biofilms on artificial surfaces including antifouling coatings immersed in two contrasting French Mediterranean coast sites

    Jean-François Briand;Ikram Djeridi;Dominique Jamet;Stéphane Coupé

  • Separate treatment of hospital and urban wastewaters: A real scale comparison of effluents and their effect on microbial communities.

    Teofana Chonova;Teofana Chonova;François Keck;Jérôme Labanowski;Bernard Montuelle

  • Avoiding quantification bias in metabarcoding: Application of a cell biovolume correction factor in diatom molecular biomonitoring

    Valentin Vasselon;Agnès Bouchez;Frédéric Rimet;Stéphan Jacquet

  • Typology of diatom communities and the influence of hydro-ecoregions: a study on the French hydrosystem scale.

    J. Tison;Y.-S. Park;M. Coste;J.G. Wasson

  • Trait-based ecological classifications for benthic algae: review and perspectives

    Kálmán Tapolczai;Agnès Bouchez;Csilla Stenger-Kovács;Judit Padisák

Frequent Co-Authors

Agnès Bouchez
Agnès Bouchez Université Savoie Mont Blanc
Luc Ector
Luc Ector Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology
Isabelle Domaizon
Isabelle Domaizon Université Savoie Mont Blanc
Stéphan Jacquet
Stéphan Jacquet INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
David G. Mann
David G. Mann Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh
Bernard Montuelle
Bernard Montuelle INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Jean-François Humbert
Jean-François Humbert INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Martyn Kelly
Martyn Kelly Durham University
Lucien Hoffmann
Lucien Hoffmann Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology
Marie-Elodie Perga
Marie-Elodie Perga University of Lausanne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution can lead to a range of rewarding careers, many of which may benefit from additional credentials in allied health or science fields. Today, a growing number of students and professionals are pursuing flexible, online degree programs to expand their skills and career options. For example, those interested in blending ecological expertise with health sciences may consider the fastest rn to bsn program online, which is ideal for registered nurses seeking to quickly advance their qualifications.

Transition pathways are available for those with an associate degree who are looking to become nurse practitioners through adn to np programs. Meanwhile, individuals without a nursing background who are considering a shift into health-related ecological research may find online msn programs for non nurses a viable option.

When selecting a program, it's important to compare institutions for program quality, flexibility, and accreditation. Reviews such as wgu vs chamberlain provide valuable insights into different online offerings. By researching these pathways, students can align their Ecology and Evolution studies with diverse career goals across both science and health sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Frédéric Rimet

Trending Scientists