World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
61
Citations
15311
World Ranking
3361
National Ranking
1898

Barbara A. Mellers publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barbara A. Mellers sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 136 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Barbara A. Mellers D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barbara A. Mellers sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Barbara A. Mellers is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their research spans several interconnected fields, with a significant focus on decision sciences and economics, econometrics, and finance.

The main fields of study covered in their work include:

  • Decision Sciences
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Barbara A. Mellers' work explores various subfields such as economics and econometrics, management science and operations research, and artificial intelligence. Other relevant areas include general decision sciences and safety research.

Key subfields of study are:

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • General Decision Sciences
  • Safety Research

The topics covered in their research include forecasting techniques and applications, sports analytics and performance, decision-making and behavioral economics, experimental behavioral economics studies, and complex systems and time series analysis. Additional research topics include mental health and psychological well-being and life satisfaction.

Main topics of work include:

  • Forecasting Techniques and Applications
  • Sports Analytics and Performance
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Barbara A. Mellers has published articles in a variety of academic venues. Frequent publication outlets for their work include:

  • International Journal of Forecasting
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Nature

Some of their recent papers are:

  • Megastudies improve the impact of applied behavioural science (2021) published in Nature
  • Income and emotional well-being: A conflict resolved (2023) published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Small steps to accuracy: Incremental belief updaters are better forecasters (2020) published in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
  • Wise teamwork: Collective confidence calibration predicts the effectiveness of group discussion (2021) published in Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
  • Bias, Information, Noise: The BIN Model of Forecasting (2021) published in Management Science

Barbara A. Mellers has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Philip E. Tetlock
  • Pavel Atanasov
  • Louise Lu
  • Lyle Ungar
  • Jens Witkowski

Best Publications

  • Emotion-based choice

    Barbara Mellers;Alan Schwartz;Ilana Ritov

  • Decision Affect Theory: Emotional Reactions to the Outcomes of Risky Options

    Barbara A. Mellers;Alan J. Schwartz;Katty Ho;Ilana Ritov

  • Choice and the relative pleasure of consequences.

    Barbara A. Mellers

  • Anticipated emotions as guides to choice.

    Barbara A. Mellers;A. Peter McGraw

  • Do Frequency Representations Eliminate Conjunction Effects? An Exercise in Adversarial Collaboration

    Barbara Mellers;Ralph Hertwig;Daniel Kahneman

  • Racial prejudice and attitudes toward affirmative action

    James H. Kuklinski;Paul M. Sniderman;Kathleen Knight;Thomas Piazza

  • Extending the Bounds of Rationality: Evidence and Theories of Preferential Choice

    Jörg Rieskamp;Jerome R. Busemeyer;Barbara A. Mellers

  • Strong Claims and Weak Evidence: Reassessing the Predictive Validity of the IAT

    Hart Blanton;James Jaccard;Jonathan Klick;Barbara Mellers

  • The Agony of Victory and Thrill of Defeat Mixed Emotional Reactions to Disappointing Wins and Relieving Losses

    Jeff T. Larsen;A. Peter McGraw;Barbara A. Mellers;John T. Cacioppo

  • Psychological Strategies for Winning a Geopolitical Forecasting Tournament

    Barbara Mellers;Lyle Ungar;Jonathan Baron;Jaime Ramos

  • The effects of pictorial realism, delay of visual feedback, and observer interactivity on the subjective sense of presence

    Robert B. Welch;Theodore T. Blackmon;Andrew Liu;Barbara A. Mellers

  • Bayesian inference: Combining base rates with opinions of sources who vary in credibility.

    Michael H. Birnbaum;Barbara A. Mellers

  • The role of actively open-minded thinking in information acquisition, accuracy, and calibration

    Uriel Haran;Ilana Ritov;Barbara A. Mellers

  • Megastudies improve the impact of applied behavioural science

    Unknown

  • Judgments of Social Justice: Compromises Between Equality and Efficiency

    Gregory Mitchell;Philip E. Tetlock;Barbara A. Mellers;Lisa D. Ordóñez

  • Identifying and Cultivating Superforecasters as a Method of Improving Probabilistic Predictions

    Barbara Mellers;Eric Stone;Terry Murray;Angela Minster

  • The psychology of intelligence analysis: drivers of prediction accuracy in world politics.

    Barbara Mellers;Eric Stone;Pavel Atanasov;Nick Rohrbaugh

  • American attitudes toward nudges

    Janice Y. Jung;Barbara A. Mellers

  • Psychological perspectives on justice : theory and applications

    Barbara A. Mellers;Jonathan Baron

  • Similarity and Choice.

    Barbara A. Mellers;Karen Biagini

  • Utility Measurement: Configural-Weight Theory and the Judge's Point of View

    Michael H. Birnbaum;Gregory Coffey;Barbara A. Mellers;Robin Weiss

  • Judgment and decision making

    B. A. Mellers;Alan J. Schwartz;A. D J Cooke

  • Rational choice in an uncertain world: Robyn M. Dawes San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1988. Pp. xi + 346, $10.00 (paper)

    Barbara Mellers

Frequent Co-Authors

Philip E. Tetlock
Philip E. Tetlock University of Pennsylvania
A. Peter McGraw
A. Peter McGraw University of Colorado Boulder
Jonathan Baron
Jonathan Baron University of Pennsylvania
Ilana Ritov
Ilana Ritov Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Ralph Hertwig
Ralph Hertwig Max Planck Institute for Human Development
James Jaccard
James Jaccard New York University
Hal R. Arkes
Hal R. Arkes The Ohio State University
Hart Blanton
Hart Blanton Texas A&M University
Jeff T. Larsen
Jeff T. Larsen University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Elke U. Weber
Elke U. Weber Princeton University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens up a range of academic and career opportunities across the United States. As you consider your options, it’s important to weigh factors like program value, flexibility, and specialization when choosing where to study.

Many students look for the best value psychology degrees in Arizona to ensure a strong return on investment. Other regions also offer unique advantages; those interested in tropical settings often compare the most valuable psychology programs in Hawaii for their online and hybrid options.

For those seeking flexibility or considering relocation, checking the best value psychology degrees in Jacksonville can be beneficial. Similarly, students in the Northeast may research the most valuable psychology programs in New Jersey to find cost-effective and reputable pathways.

Online psychology degrees equip graduates for diverse careers, including mental health, education, business, and counseling. By strategically selecting an accredited and highly ranked program, you can maximize your future career opportunities in this rewarding field.

Best Scientists Citing Barbara A. Mellers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles