World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
36
Citations
14399
World Ranking
9310
National Ranking
4921

Jeff T. Larsen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeff T. Larsen sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 68 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jeff T. Larsen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeff T. Larsen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jeff T. Larsen is affiliated with the University of Tennessee at Knoxville in the United States. Their research spans the fields of psychology and neuroscience, with a focus on cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, neurology, social psychology, and sensory systems.

The scientist's work covers several main topics including face recognition and perception, evolutionary psychology and human behavior, botulinum toxin and related neurological disorders, olfactory and sensory function studies, identity, memory, therapy, aging and gerontology research, and nostalgia and consumer behavior.

Jeff T. Larsen has published research articles in prominent venues such as Nature Human Behaviour, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Emotion, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, and Journal of Psychiatric Research.

  • A multi-lab test of the facial feedback hypothesis by the Many Smiles Collaboration (2022, Nature Human Behaviour)
  • Fact or artifact? Demand characteristics and participants' beliefs can moderate, but do not fully account for, the effects of facial feedback on emotional experience. (2022, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
  • Meaningful endings and mixed emotions: The double-edged sword of reminiscence on good times. (2021, Emotion)
  • Face Coverings Differentially Alter Valence Judgments of Emotional Expressions (2023, Basic and Applied Social Psychology)
  • Letter to the editor: Claims about the effects of botulinum toxin on depression should raise some eyebrows (2021, Journal of Psychiatric Research)

Frequent collaborators include Nicholas A. Coles, Dana Basnight-Brown, Lowell Gaertner, David S. March, and Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos.

Best Publications

  • Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in evaluative categorizations.

    Tiffany A. Ito;Jeff T. Larsen;N. Kyle Smith;John T. Cacioppo

  • The psychophysiology of emotion.

    Jeff T. Larsen;Gary G. Berntson;Kirsten M. Poehlmann;Tiffany A. Ito

  • Can people feel happy and sad at the same time

    Jeff T. Larsen;A. Peter McGraw;John T. Cacioppo

  • Perceiving an Object and Its Context in Different Cultures A Cultural Look at New Look

    Shinobu Kitayama;Sean Duffy;Tadashi Kawamura;Jeff T. Larsen

  • Effects of positive and negative affect on electromyographic activity over zygomaticus major and corrugator supercilii

    Jeff T. Larsen;Catherine J. Norris;John T. Cacioppo

  • May I have your attention, please: Electrocortical responses to positive and negative stimuli

    N.Kyle Smith;John T Cacioppo;Jeff T Larsen;Tanya L Chartrand

  • Further evidence for mixed emotions.

    Jeff T. Larsen;A. Peter McGraw

  • Context dependence of the event-related brain potential associated with reward and punishment.

    Clay B. Holroyd;Jeff T. Larsen;Jonathan D. Cohen

  • The good, the bad and the neutral: electrophysiological responses to feedback stimuli.

    Clay B. Holroyd;Greg Hajcak;Jeff T. Larsen

  • The Agony of Victory and Thrill of Defeat Mixed Emotional Reactions to Disappointing Wins and Relieving Losses

    Jeff T. Larsen;A. Peter McGraw;Barbara A. Mellers;John T. Cacioppo

  • Turning adversity to advantage: On the virtues of the coactivation of positive and negative emotions.

    Jeff T. Larsen;Scott H. Hemenover;Catherine J. Norris;John T. Cacioppo

  • Being Bad Isn't Always Good: Affective Context Moderates the Attention Bias Toward Negative Information

    N. Kyle Smith;Jeff T. Larsen;Tanya L. Chartrand;John T. Cacioppo

  • The evaluative space grid : A single-item measure of positivity and negativity

    Jeff T. Larsen;Catherine J. Norris;A. Peter McGraw;Louise C. Hawkley

  • Neuroticism is associated with larger and more prolonged electrodermal responses to emotionally evocative pictures.

    Catherine J. Norris;Jeff T. Larsen;John T. Cacioppo

  • Comparing Gains and Losses

    A. Peter McGraw;Jeff T. Larsen;Daniel Kahneman;David Schkade

  • A meta-analysis of the facial feedback literature: Effects of facial feedback on emotional experience are small and variable.

    Nicholas A. Coles;Jeff T. Larsen;Heather C. Lench

  • The Case for Mixed Emotions

    Jeff T. Larsen;A. Peter McGraw

  • Children's Understanding and Experience of Mixed Emotions

    Jeff T. Larsen;Yen M. To;Gary Fireman

  • Exploring the Valence‐Framing Effect: Negative Framing Enhances Attitude Strength

    George Y. Bizer;Jeff T. Larsen;Richard E. Petty

  • Feeling more together: group attention intensifies emotion.

    Garriy Shteynberg;Jacob B. Hirsh;Evan P. Apfelbaum;Jeff T. Larsen

  • Better (or worse) for some than others: Individual differences in the positivity offset and negativity bias

    Catherine J. Norris;Jeff T. Larsen;L. Elizabeth Crawford;John T. Cacioppo

Frequent Co-Authors

John T. Cacioppo
John T. Cacioppo University of Chicago
A. Peter McGraw
A. Peter McGraw University of Colorado Boulder
Gary G. Berntson
Gary G. Berntson The Ohio State University
Louise C. Hawkley
Louise C. Hawkley University of Chicago
Barbara A. Mellers
Barbara A. Mellers University of Pennsylvania
Tiffany A. Ito
Tiffany A. Ito University of Colorado Boulder
Lowell Gaertner
Lowell Gaertner University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Gregory P. Strauss
Gregory P. Strauss University of Georgia
Daniel Kahneman
Daniel Kahneman Princeton University
Alex S. Cohen
Alex S. Cohen Louisiana State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens doors to numerous fulfilling pathways, with online degrees making education more accessible than ever. Students pursuing psychology can choose from diverse online programs, ranging from bachelor’s to master’s and even doctoral degrees. These options allow for specialization in mental health counseling, school psychology, and clinical practice, among others.

To become a practicing mental health counselor, it’s important to understand varying state and city-specific requirements. For example, if you’re wondering how to become a mental health counselor in Durham or are interested in El Paso mental health counselor education requirements, both educational credentials and supervised experience are essential.

Similarly, you’ll find helpful information about how to become a mental health counselor in Fort Wayne and Fort Worth mental health counselor education requirements. Each city may have its own licensing standards and practicum hours. Researching these requirements early in your academic journey will help you select the right online degree and chart a clear path toward a rewarding career in mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Jeff T. Larsen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles