World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 91 11773 11076 6038 5590 417 29749

Thomas L. Chenevert publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas L. Chenevert between 1977 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas L. Chenevert published across 49 years, from 1977 to 2025, averaging 9.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2023. 30 of the 449 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2023. 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 2 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 7 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 9 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 17 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 18 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 24 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 14 publications
1977 2025

449 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas L. Chenevert: publications per year, 1977 to 2025
Year Publications
1977 1
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 1
1982 2
1983 2
1984 3
1985 0
1986 3
1987 2
1988 3
1989 7
1990 7
1991 7
1992 2
1993 3
1994 3
1995 6
1996 4
1997 9
1998 7
1999 3
2000 10
2001 1
2002 9
2003 8
2004 17
2005 14
2006 18
2007 14
2008 16
2009 21
2010 15
2011 9
2012 20
2013 11
2014 15
2015 9
2016 15
2017 13
2018 12
2019 16
2020 22
2021 23
2022 12
2023 24
2024 16
2025 14
Total 449
Download as CSV

Thomas L. Chenevert publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas L. Chenevert sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 401–420 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 417 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918 417
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas L. Chenevert D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas L. Chenevert sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 90–91 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922 91
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Thomas L. Chenevert is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of medicine, with a strong focus on radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging. The subfields covered include genetics, molecular biology, epidemiology, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

Chenevert's research addresses various advanced topics in medical imaging, including:

  • MRI in cancer diagnosis
  • Radiomics and machine learning in medical imaging
  • Advanced MRI techniques and applications
  • Advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications
  • Medical imaging techniques and applications
  • Myeloproliferative neoplasms: diagnosis and treatment
  • Bone and joint diseases

Frequent co-authors contributing to their body of work include Dariya Malyarenko, Brian D. Ross, Savannah C. Partridge, Lisa J. Wilmes, and Gary D. Luker.

Chenevert has published extensively in several scientific venues, including:

  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition (16 publications)
  • Tomography (14 publications)
  • Radiology (4 publications)
  • International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics (4 publications)
  • CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics (3 publications)

Significant recent papers authored or co-authored by Chenevert include:

  • Moderate-Intensity Exercise and High-Intensity Interval Training Affect Insulin Sensitivity Similarly in Obese Adults, 2020, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
  • Predicting breast cancer response to neoadjuvant treatment using multi-feature MRI: results from the I-SPY 2 TRIAL, 2020, npj Breast Cancer
  • Linearity and Bias of Proton Density Fat Fraction as a Quantitative Imaging Biomarker: A Multicenter, Multiplatform, Multivendor Phantom Study, 2021, Radiology
  • Greater Somatosensory Afference With Acupuncture Increases Primary Somatosensory Connectivity and Alleviates Fibromyalgia Pain via Insular γ-Aminobutyric Acid: A Randomized Neuroimaging Trial, 2020, Arthritis & Rheumatology
  • Radiotherapy (RT) Dose-intensification (DI) Using Intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) versus Standard-dose (SD) RT with Temozolomide (TMZ) in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma (GBM): Preliminary Results of NRG Oncology BN001, 2020, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics

Best Publications

  • Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Cancer Biomarker: Consensus and Recommendations

    Anwar R. Padhani;Guoying Liu;Dow Mu-Koh;Thomas L. Chenevert

  • Imaging biomarker roadmap for cancer studies.

    James P.B. O'Connor;Eric O. Aboagye;Judith E. Adams;Hugo J.W.L. Aerts;Hugo J.W.L. Aerts

  • Experimental intracerebral hemorrhage : relationship between brain edema, blood flow, and blood-brain barrier permeability in rats

    G. Y. Yang;A. L. Betz;T. L. Chenevert;James A Brunberg

  • Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches.

    M R Prince;D L Narasimham;J C Stanley;T L Chenevert

  • Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging: an Early Surrogate Marker of Therapeutic Efficacy in Brain Tumors

    Thomas L. Chenevert;Lauren D. Stegman;Jeremy M.G. Taylor;Patricia L. Robertson

  • Functional diffusion map: A noninvasive MRI biomarker for early stratification of clinical brain tumor response

    Bradford A. Moffat;Thomas L. Chenevert;Theodore S. Lawrence;Charles R. Meyer

  • Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism with Magnetic Resonance Angiography

    James F.M. Meaney;John G. Weg;Thomas L. Chenevert;David Stafford-Johnson

  • Combined effect of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand and ionizing radiation in breast cancer therapy.

    Arul M. Chinnaiyan;Uttara Prasad;Sunita Shankar;Daniel A. Hamstra

  • The effects of time varying intravascular signal intensity and k‐space acquisition order on three‐dimensional MR angiography image quality

    Jeffrey H. Maki;Martin R. Prince;Frank J. Londy;Thomas L. Chenevert

  • Automated detection of bolus arrival and initiation of data acquisition in fast, three-dimensional, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography.

    Thomas K F Foo;Manojkumar Saranathan;Martin R. Prince;Thomas L. Chenevert

  • Evaluation of the functional diffusion map as an early biomarker of time-to-progression and overall survival in high-grade glioma

    Daniel A. Hamstra;Thomas L. Chenevert;Bradford A. Moffat;Timothy D. Johnson

  • Body diffusion kurtosis imaging: Basic principles, applications, and considerations for clinical practice

    Andrew B. Rosenkrantz;Anwar R. Padhani;Thomas L. Chenevert;Dow Mu Koh

  • Hepatic fat fraction: MR imaging for quantitative measurement and display--early experience.

    Hero K. Hussain;Thomas L. Chenevert;Frank J. Londy;Vikas Gulani

  • Functional diffusion map as an early imaging biomarker for high-grade glioma: correlation with conventional radiologic response and overall survival.

    Daniel A. Hamstra;Craig J. Galbán;Charles R. Meyer;Timothy D. Johnson

  • Contrast-enhanced abdominal MR angiography: Optimization of imaging delay time by automating the detection of contrast material arrival in the aorta

    Martin R. Prince;Thomas L. Chenevert;Thomas K.F. Foo;Frank J. Londy

  • Evaluation of cancer therapy using diffusion magnetic resonance imaging.

    Brian D. Ross;Bradford A. Moffat;Theodore S. Lawrence;Suresh K. Mukherji

  • Quantitative imaging biomarkers alliance (QIBA) recommendations for improved precision of DWI and DCE‐MRI derived biomarkers in multicenter oncology trials

    Amita Shukla-Dave;Nancy A. Obuchowski;Thomas L. Chenevert;Sachin Jambawalikar

  • Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma: Comparison of MR Imaging With CT and I-131 MIBG Scintigraphy

    L.E. Quint;G.M. Glazer;I.R. Francis;B. Shapiro

  • Clinical Applications of Diffusion Tensor Imaging

    Qian Dong;Robert C. Welsh;Thomas L. Chenevert;Ruth C. Carlos

  • Gadolinium-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Pulmonary Embolism

    Paul D. Stein;Thomas L. Chenevert;Sarah E. Fowler;Lawrence R. Goodman

Frequent Co-Authors

Brian D. Ross
Brian D. Ross University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Alnawaz Rehemtulla
Alnawaz Rehemtulla University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Theodore S. Lawrence
Theodore S. Lawrence University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Larry Junck
Larry Junck University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Paul L. Carson
Paul L. Carson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Martin R. Prince
Martin R. Prince Cornell University
Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer
Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer Harvard University
Mark A. Helvie
Mark A. Helvie University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Paul E. Kinahan
Paul E. Kinahan University of Washington
Jon A. Jacobson
Jon A. Jacobson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The evolving healthcare field offers a range of online degrees and flexible career pathways for those interested in medicine or related disciplines. For registered nurses aiming to advance quickly, adn to msn bridge programs allow you to pursue a master’s without starting from scratch, accelerating your career growth.

If you are passionate about nutrition and wellness, earning an online degree nutrition can open doors to roles in public health, clinical settings, or research. This pathway supports those wanting to blend healthcare with nutrition expertise.

For future healthcare leaders, cahme-accredited online MHA programs ensure quality training in healthcare administration, preparing graduates for management positions in hospitals, clinics, and other organizations.

For RNs seeking to upgrade their credentials with minimal disruption, fully online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements make it possible to balance work and study from anywhere.

Each of these online pathways can complement traditional medical studies, offering flexible opportunities for career advancement within the vast healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas L. Chenevert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles