World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
81
Citations
25132
World Ranking
16594
National Ranking
8332

Julian T. Hoff publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julian T. Hoff sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 253 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Julian T. Hoff D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julian T. Hoff sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1999 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)

Overview

Julian T. Hoff was affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States during their academic career. Their work was recognized within the scientific community, culminating in their election as a Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) in 1999.

Details about their research publications, including recent papers, are not documented in the available data. Similarly, information regarding frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publishers, main fields and subfields of study, and main research topics has not been provided.

While their specific areas of research output remain unspecified, the association with a major research university and the NAM membership indicate involvement in medical or biomedical sciences. The membership award is typically bestowed upon scholars who have made contributions to medicine or health-related fields.

Julian T. Hoff is noted as deceased. The profile therefore addresses their academic legacy in the past tense without attributing any ongoing research activities.

Best Publications

  • Mechanisms of brain injury after intracerebral haemorrhage

    Guohua Xi;Richard F Keep;Julian T Hoff

  • Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature.

    Paul Park;Hugh J. Garton;Vishal C. Gala;Julian T. Hoff

  • Contaminants in the Canadian Arctic: 5 years of progress in understanding sources, occurrence and pathways.

    R.W. Macdonald;L.A. Barrie;T.F. Bidleman;M.L. Diamond

  • Experimental intracerebral hemorrhage : relationship between brain edema, blood flow, and blood-brain barrier permeability in rats

    G. Y. Yang;A. L. Betz;T. L. Chenevert;James A Brunberg

  • Brain edema after experimental intracerebral hemorrhage: role of hemoglobin degradation products

    Feng Ping Huang;Guohua Xi;Richard F. Keep;Ya Hua

  • Behavioral Tests After Intracerebral Hemorrhage in the Rat

    Ya Hua;Timothy J Schallert;Richard F. Keep;Jimin Wu

  • Iron and Iron-Handling Proteins in the Brain After Intracerebral Hemorrhage

    Jimin Wu;Ya Hua;Richard F. Keep;Takehiro Nakamura

  • Mechanisms of edema formation after intracerebral hemorrhage: effects of thrombin on cerebral blood flow, blood-brain barrier permeability, and cell survival in a rat model

    Kevin R. Lee;Nobuyuki Kawai;Seoung Kim;Oren Sagher

  • Edema from intracerebral hemorrhage: the role of thrombin.

    K. R. Lee;G. P. Colon;A. L. Betz;R. F. Keep

  • Role of Blood Clot Formation on Early Edema Development After Experimental Intracerebral Hemorrhage

    Guohua Xi;Kenneth R. Wagner;Kenneth R. Wagner;Richard F. Keep;Ya Hua

  • Middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats: a neurological and pathological evaluation of a reproducible model.

    Stephen Menzies;Julian Hoff;A. Betz

  • Erythrocytes and delayed brain edema formation following intracerebral hemorrhage in rats

    Guohua Xi;Richard F. Keep;Julian T. Hoff

  • Acute inflammatory reaction following experimental intracerebral hemorrhage in rat.

    Chao Gong;Julian T Hoff;Richard F Keep

  • Skull x-ray examinations after head trauma. Recommendations by a multidisciplinary panel and validation study.

    S J Masters;P M McClean;J S Arcarese;R F Brown

  • Deferoxamine-induced attenuation of brain edema and neurological deficits in a rat model of intracerebral hemorrhage.

    Takehiro Nakamura;Richard F. Keep;Ya Hua;Timothy J Schallert

  • Intracerebral hemorrhage-induced neuronal death.

    Chao Gong;Nicholas Boulis;Jun Qian;Danielle E. Turner

  • Brain injury after intracerebral hemorrhage: the role of thrombin and iron.

    Ya Hua;Richard F. Keep;Julian T. Hoff;Guohua Xi

  • Mechanisms of Edema Formation After Intracerebral Hemorrhage Effects of Extravasated Red Blood Cells on Blood Flow and Blood-Brain Barrier Integrity

    Guohua Xi;Ya Hua;R. Rick Bhasin;Steven R. Ennis

  • Attenuation of Thrombin-Induced Brain Edema by Cerebral Thrombin Preconditioning

    Guohua Xi;Richard F. Keep;Ya Hua;Jianming Xiang

  • EDITOR'S PERSPECTIVE ON ARTICLE 1: Mechanisms of edema formation after intracerebral hemorrhage: effects of thrombin on cerebral blood flow, blood-brain barrier permeability, and cell survival in a rat model

    Kevin R. Lee;Nobuyuki Kawai;Seoung Kim;Oren Sagher

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard F. Keep
Richard F. Keep University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Guohua Xi
Guohua Xi University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Keith L. Black
Keith L. Black Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Timothy J Schallert
Timothy J Schallert The University of Texas at Austin
Nicholas M. Boulis
Nicholas M. Boulis Emory University
Anthony Marmarou
Anthony Marmarou Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center
Guo-Yuan Yang
Guo-Yuan Yang Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Norman S. Radin
Norman S. Radin University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Justin B. Dimick
Justin B. Dimick University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Thomas L. Chenevert
Thomas L. Chenevert University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in a career related to medicine, but not ready for medical school? There are a variety of online degrees and alternative pathways you can pursue. Many students explore fields like healthcare administration, nursing, or advanced practice roles to build a rewarding career in healthcare.

For those interested in mental health, exploring the shortest online pmhnp programs can fast-track your way to becoming a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner. This advanced practice role is in high demand and suited for individuals passionate about mental health care.

If you are drawn to the business side of healthcare, a bachelors in healthcare administration is a strong starting point. To advance further, many pursue the cheapest mha programs to earn a Master’s degree and qualify for leadership positions in clinics, hospitals, or healthcare organizations.

Nurses seeking the highest credentials can look into the cheapest dnp program to achieve a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree online. These pathways give you flexible, affordable options to launch or advance your healthcare career without attending medical school.

Best Scientists Citing Julian T. Hoff

Recently Published Articles