World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
59
Citations
22741
World Ranking
3926
National Ranking
53

Hua Feng publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hua Feng sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 351 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Hua Feng D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hua Feng sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Controversies and evolving new mechanisms in subarachnoid hemorrhage.

    Sheng Chen;Hua Feng;Prativa Sherchan;Damon Klebe

  • Curcumin attenuates acute inflammatory injury by inhibiting the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB signaling pathway in experimental traumatic brain injury

    Hai-tao Zhu;Chen Bian;Ji-chao Yuan;Wei-hua Chu

  • NLRP3 inflammasome contributes to inflammation after intracerebral hemorrhage

    Qingyi Ma;Sheng Chen;Sheng Chen;Qin Hu;Hua Feng

  • Erratum to: Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition) (Autophagy, 12, 1, 1-222, 10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Characterizing iron deposition in Parkinson's disease using susceptibility-weighted imaging: An in vivo MR study

    Jiuquan Zhang;Yanling Zhang;Jian Wang;Ping Cai

  • Glioma-initiating cells: a predominant role in microglia/macrophages tropism to glioma.

    Liang Yi;Hualiang Xiao;Minhui Xu;Xianzong Ye

  • Terahertz pulsed spectroscopy of paraffin-embedded brain glioma

    Kun Meng;Tu-nan Chen;Tao Chen;Li-guo Zhu

  • Glial scar and neuroregeneration: histological, functional, and magnetic resonance imaging analysis in chronic spinal cord injury.

    Rong Hu;Jianjun Zhou;Chunxia Luo;Jiangkai Lin

  • Hematoma Evacuation via Image-Guided Para-Corticospinal Tract Approach in Patients with Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

    Chao Zhang;Hongfei Ge;Shuixian Zhang;Dan Liu

  • The Injury and Therapy of Reactive Oxygen Species in Intracerebral Hemorrhage Looking at Mitochondria.

    Jie Qu;Weixiang Chen;Rong Hu;Hua Feng

  • Endogenous hydrogen sulphide attenuates NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated neuroinflammation by suppressing the P2X7 receptor after intracerebral haemorrhage in rats.

    Hengli Zhao;Pengyu Pan;Yang Yang;Hongfei Ge

  • Role of Glibenclamide in Brain Injury After Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

    Bing Jiang;Lin Li;Qianwei Chen;Yihao Tao

  • Functional recovery in acute traumatic spinal cord injury after transplantation of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells.

    Sheng-Li Hu;Hai-Shui Luo;Jiang-Tao Li;Yong-Zhi Xia

  • Norrin Protected Blood–Brain Barrier Via Frizzled-4/β-Catenin Pathway After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in Rats

    Yujie Chen;Yang Zhang;Junjia Tang;Fei Liu

  • Cannabinoid receptor-2 stimulation suppresses neuroinflammation by regulating microglial M1/M2 polarization through the cAMP/PKA pathway in an experimental GMH rat model

    Yihao Tao;Lin Li;Bing Jiang;Zhou Feng

  • Ginsenoside Rh2 inhibits glioma cell proliferation by targeting microRNA-128

    Nan Wu;Guo-cai Wu;Rong Hu;Mei Li

  • Exposure to 900 MHz electromagnetic fields activates the mkp-1/ERK pathway and causes blood-brain barrier damage and cognitive impairment in rats.

    Jun Tang;Yuan Zhang;Liming Yang;Qianwei Chen

  • Post-hemorrhagic hydrocephalus: Recent advances and new therapeutic insights.

    Qianwei Chen;Zhou Feng;Qiang Tan;Jing Guo

  • Immediate splenectomy decreases mortality and improves cognitive function of rats after severe traumatic brain injury.

    Mei Li;Fei Li;Chunxia Luo;Youan Shan

  • Curcumin inhibits microglia inflammation and confers neuroprotection in intracerebral hemorrhage.

    Zhao Yang;Tianzhi Zhao;Yongjie Zou;John H. Zhang

  • Intracerebral Hematoma Contributes to Hydrocephalus After Intraventricular Hemorrhage via Aggravating Iron Accumulation

    Qianwei Chen;Jun Tang;Liang Tan;Jing Guo

Frequent Co-Authors

John H. Zhang
John H. Zhang Loma Linda University
Jianquan Yao
Jianquan Yao Tianjin University
Jiping Tang
Jiping Tang Loma Linda University
Tianzi Jiang
Tianzi Jiang Chinese Academy of Sciences
Evelina Gatti
Evelina Gatti Aix-Marseille University
Sam Gandy
Sam Gandy Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Leonidas C. Platanias
Leonidas C. Platanias Northwestern University
Hsing Jien Kung
Hsing Jien Kung Taipei Medical University
Maurizio Molinari
Maurizio Molinari Universita della Svizzera Italiana
Beth Levine
Beth Levine The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience can open doors to multiple career paths in health, academia, and research. However, students may also consider related online programs that provide both flexibility and specialized knowledge. For those interested in therapy and counseling, affordable online mft programs offer a pathway to becoming a licensed family therapist, which aligns well with understanding the brain and behavior.

If you want a broad and versatile degree, pursuing an online masters psychology can deepen your grasp of cognitive science and mental health. There are also accessible online psychology degree options at the undergraduate level, ideal for those just starting out or hoping to shift careers.

For learners passionate about social work and community impact, the easiest online msw program options may provide a less competitive entry point to a fulfilling field. Together, these related degrees help build a well-rounded foundation for roles in clinical practice, research, and human services connected to neuroscience and mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Hua Feng

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles