World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Ireland
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
55
Citations
12693
World Ranking
4293
National Ranking
11

Aljoscha Smolic publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aljoscha Smolic sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 289 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Aljoscha Smolic D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aljoscha Smolic sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Ireland Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Ireland Leader Award

Best Publications

  • Efficient Prediction Structures for Multiview Video Coding

    P. Merkle;A. Smolic;K. Muller;T. Wiegand

  • Multi-View Video Plus Depth Representation and Coding

    P. Merkle;A. Smolic;K. Muller;T. Wiegand

  • Nonlinear disparity mapping for stereoscopic 3D

    Manuel Lang;Alexander Hornung;Oliver Wang;Steven Poulakos

  • Depth map creation and image-based rendering for advanced 3DTV services providing interoperability and scalability

    P. Kauff;N. Atzpadin;C. Fehn;M. Müller

  • Coding Algorithms for 3DTV—A Survey

    A. Smolic;K. Mueller;N. Stefanoski;J. Ostermann

  • 3D Video and Free Viewpoint Video - Technologies, Applications and MPEG Standards

    Aljoscha Smolic;Karsten Mueller;Philipp Merkle;Christoph Fehn

  • Multiview Imaging and 3DTV

    Akira Kubota;Aljoscha Smolic;Marcus Magnor;Masayuki Tanimoto

  • The effects of multiview depth video compression on multiview rendering

    P. Merkle;Y. Morvan;A. Smolic;D. Farin

  • View Synthesis for Advanced 3D Video Systems

    Karsten Müller;Aljoscha Smolic;Kristina Dix;Philipp Merkle

  • Intermediate view synthesis and multi-view data signal extraction

    Aljosa Smolic;Karsten Mueller;Kristina Dix

  • Intermediate view interpolation based on multiview video plus depth for advanced 3D video systems

    A. Smolic;K. Muller;K. Dix;P. Merkle

  • ACTION-Net: Multipath Excitation for Action Recognition

    Zhengwei Wang;Qi She;Aljosa Smolic

  • Long-term global motion estimation and its application for sprite coding, content description, and segmentation

    A. Smolic;T. Sikora;J.-R. Ohm

  • 3DAV exploration of video-based rendering technology in MPEG

    A. Smolic;D. McCutchen

  • SIFT Implementation and Optimization for General-Purpose GPU

    S. Heymann;K. Müller;A. Smolic;B. Fröhlich

  • Three-Dimensional Video Postproduction and Processing

    A Smolic;P Kauff;S Knorr;A Hornung

  • Efficient Compression of Multi-View Video Exploiting Inter-View Dependencies Based on H.264/MPEG4-AVC

    P. Merkle;K. Muller;A. Smolic;T. Wiegand

  • SalNet360: Saliency Maps for omni-directional images with CNN

    Rafael Monroy;Sebastian Lutz;Tejo Chalasani;Aljosa Smolic

  • An overview of available and emerging 3D video formats and depth enhanced stereo as efficient generic solution

    Aljoscha Smolic;Karsten Mueller;Philipp Merkle;Peter Kauff

  • Practical temporal consistency for image-based graphics applications

    Manuel Lang;Oliver Wang;Tunc Aydin;Aljoscha Smolic

  • Scene Representation Technologies for 3DTV—A Survey

    A.A. Alatan;Y. Yemez;U. Gudukbay;X. Zabulis

  • AlphaGAN: Generative adversarial networks for natural image matting

    Sebastian Lutz;Konstantinos Amplianitis;Aljosa Smolic

Frequent Co-Authors

Heiko Schwarz
Heiko Schwarz Fraunhofer Institute for Telecommunications, Heinrich Hertz Institute
Anthony Vetro
Anthony Vetro Mitsubishi Electric (United States)
Thomas Sikora
Thomas Sikora Technical University of Berlin
Thomas Wiegand
Thomas Wiegand Technical University of Berlin
Oliver Wang
Oliver Wang Adobe Systems (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens the door to many dynamic career options—both in traditional IT roles and in fast-growing engineering fields. For students interested in expanding their technical skills, consider reviewing online electrical engineering career outcomes to understand the impact of an engineering background on your professional prospects.

If you’re looking to enhance your resume quickly, quick certifications that pay well are a great way to gain valuable skills and improve your employability in months, not years. Likewise, those aiming for advanced roles may prefer pursuing a master’s degree. There are now several options for the quickest online masters degree programs, which let you earn a respected credential in as little as one year.

Not sure which direction to take? Explore what masters program should i do to discover high-demand, in-demand academic tracks that align with current industry trends. With so many efficient learning options, finding the perfect path for your career goals has never been easier.

Best Scientists Citing Aljoscha Smolic

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles