World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Steven E. Salterio

Steven E. Salterio

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 38 1831 1714 80 73 112 8999
Economics and Finance 38 2508 2269 65 57 111 8984

Steven E. Salterio publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Steven E. Salterio between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Steven E. Salterio published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 3.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2016. 6 of the 120 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2016. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 4 publications 2025: 2 publications
1993 2025

120 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Steven E. Salterio: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 1
1995 0
1996 2
1997 3
1998 1
1999 1
2000 3
2001 6
2002 2
2003 2
2004 3
2005 3
2006 2
2007 4
2008 6
2009 5
2010 8
2011 4
2012 5
2013 3
2014 5
2015 4
2016 12
2017 8
2018 2
2019 3
2020 5
2021 5
2022 4
2023 1
2024 4
2025 2
Total 120
Download as CSV

Steven E. Salterio publications per year - data summary

  • Steven E. Salterio, a Business and Management scholar from Queen's University, has 120 publications recorded across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1993 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2016, with 12 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1993, 1994, 1998, 1999 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 33 years in the span carries no publications at all (1995).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.6 papers per year over the whole span, or 3.8 per year counting only the 32 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 16 publications, 13% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1993-2003: 22 publications (2.0 per year); 2004-2014: 48 publications (4.4 per year); 2015-2025: 50 publications (4.5 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Steven E. Salterio publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven E. Salterio sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 110–114 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 112 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96 112
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Steven E. Salterio publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,017 Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 82 ranges running from 35–39 to 436+ publications.
  • Steven E. Salterio, a Business and Management scholar from Queen's University, records 112 publications - the 35th percentile of the discipline.
  • 35% of ranked Business and Management scientists score the same or lower than Steven E. Salterio, and about 65% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 135–139 publications range, and Steven E. Salterio ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 95–99 publications, holding 122 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 52% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 135–139 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 436 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Steven E. Salterio D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven E. Salterio sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103 38
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Steven E. Salterio D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,017 Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 60 ranges running from 30 to 89+ D-Index.
  • Steven E. Salterio, a Business and Management scholar from Queen's University, records 38 D-Index - the 41st percentile of the discipline.
  • 41% of ranked Business and Management scientists score the same or lower than Steven E. Salterio, and about 59% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 42 D-Index range, and Steven E. Salterio ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32 D-Index, holding 171 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 44 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more, 96 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Overview

Steven E. Salterio is affiliated with Queen's University in Canada and has contributed extensively to the field of Business, Management, and Accounting, with a primary focus on Accounting. Their research encompasses subfields such as Accounting, Management Information Systems, Public Administration, Strategy and Management, and Gender Studies.

Their work covers several key topics including Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance; Corporate Finance and Governance; Accounting and Organizational Management; Accounting Education and Careers; Public Policy and Administration Research; Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting; and Gender Diversity and Inequality.

Salterio's publication record includes contributions to a range of academic venues, notably:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Journal of Business Ethics
  • Accounting Organizations and Society
  • Contemporary Accounting Research
  • Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics

Recent papers by Salterio demonstrate engagement with diverse research questions. These include:

  • "Communication is a two-way street: Analyzing practices undertaken to systematically transfer audit research knowledge to policymakers," 2021, Accounting Organizations and Society
  • "Accounting for the Unaccountable - Perspectives on the Economic Effects of the Coronavirus 19 Pandemic," 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal
  • "The Effect of Gender on Investors' Judgments and Decision-Making," 2021, Journal of Business Ethics (coauthored by Yi Luo)
  • "Evidence-Informed Audit Standard Setting: Exploring Evidence Use and Knowledge Transfer," 2022, Contemporary Accounting Research (coauthored by Kris Hoang)
  • "Modeling board governance, environmental expertise, and social engagement effects on firm environmental performance: Panel data evidence," 2023, Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics (coauthored by Daehyun Kim)

Frequent coauthors with whom Salterio has collaborated include:

  • Yi Luo
  • Kris Hoang
  • Constance Adamson
  • Daehyun Kim
  • Michael J. Marin

Best Publications

  • The Balanced Scorecard: Judgmental Effects of Common and Unique Performance Measures

    Marlys Gascho Lipe;Steven E. Salterio

  • The Effects of Corporate Governance Experience and Financial‐Reporting and Audit Knowledge on Audit Committee Members' Judgments

    F. Todd DeZoort;Steven E. Salterio

  • The Relationship between Board Characteristics and Voluntary Improvements in Audit Committee Composition and Experience

    Mark S. Beasley;Steven E. Salterio

  • Evidence About Auditor–Client Management Negotiation Concerning Client’s Financial Reporting

    Michael Gibbins;Steven Salterio;Alan Webb

  • The Balanced Scorecard: The Effects of Assurance and Process Accountability on Managerial Judgment

    Theresa Libby;Steven E. Salterio;Alan Webb

  • A note on the judgmental effects of the balanced scorecard's information organization

    Marlys Gascho Lipe;Steven Salterio

  • Auditing: Assurance and Risk

    W. Robert Knechel;Steven E. Salterio

  • “Doing Good Field Research”: Assessing the Quality of Audit Field Research

    Bertrand Malsch;Steven E. Salterio

  • Auditor–client management relationships and roles in negotiating financial reporting

    Susan McCracken;Steven E. Salterio;Michael Gibbins

  • The persuasiveness of audit evidence: The case of accounting policy decisions☆

    S. Salterio;L. Koonce

  • The Chief Financial Officer's Perspective on Auditor-Client Negotiations*

    Michael Gibbins;Susan A. McCracken;Steve E. Salterio

  • Evidence about Auditor-Client Management Negotiation Concerning Client's Financial Reporting

    Michael Gibbins;Alan Webb;Steven Salterio

  • Direct and Indirect Effects of Internal Control Weaknesses on Accrual Quality: Evidence from a Unique Canadian Regulatory Setting*

    Hai Lu;Gordon Richardson;Steven Salterio

  • Negotiations over Accounting Issues: The Congruency of Audit Partner and Chief Financial Officer Recalls

    Michael Gibbins;Susan A. McCracken;Steven E. Salterio

  • The construction of auditability: MBA rankings and assurance in practice

    Clinton Free;Steven E. Salterio;Teri Shearer

  • Fifteen years in the trenches: Auditor–client negotiations exposed and explored

    Steven E. Salterio

  • The auditor’s strategy selection for negotiation with management: Flexibility of initial accounting position and nature of the relationship

    Michael Gibbins;Susan McCracken;Steven E. Salterio

  • Error management in audit firms: Error climate, type, and originator

    Anna Gold;Ulfert Gronewold;Steven E. Salterio

  • Reporting Self-Made Errors: The Impact of Organizational Error-Management Climate and Error Type

    Ulfert Gronewold;Anna Gold;Steven E. Salterio

  • The effects of precedents and client position on auditors' financial accounting policy judgment☆

    Steven Salterio

  • Doing Good Field Research: Assessing the Quality of Audit Field Research

    Bertrand Malsch;Steven Salterio

Frequent Co-Authors

W. Robert Knechel
W. Robert Knechel University of Florida
Gordon D. Richardson
Gordon D. Richardson University of Toronto
Lisa Koonce
Lisa Koonce The University of Texas at Austin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Thinking beyond traditional business and management degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Today, an increasing number of students are pursuing specialized online degrees that complement business skills and increase employability across industries.

For example, many business professionals find value in healthcare management. If cost is a concern, searching for the cheapest online healthcare management degree programs can lead to accredited options that don't break the bank. Those seeking advanced roles often pursue a Master of Healthcare Administration. There are many cheap mha programs designed for busy professionals wanting to balance work and further study.

Another promising pathway is accounting. Earning an accounting degree online is a flexible way to gain core financial skills sought after by businesses of all sizes. Additionally, with technology rapidly transforming the business landscape, skills in artificial intelligence are in high demand. Exploring ai degrees online can help future-proof your career and position you for leadership roles in innovative organizations.

Best Scientists Citing Steven E. Salterio

Trending Scientists