World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
7098
World Ranking
9277
National Ranking
3949

Raymond E. Ozzie publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raymond E. Ozzie sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 100 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Raymond E. Ozzie D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raymond E. Ozzie sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2010 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 2000 - W. Wallace McDowell Award, IEEE Computer Society For his vision, determination, and programming skill in the development of Lotus Notes, a program that enables groups of people to work collaboratively over computer networks.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Operating system
  • The Internet
  • Computer network

Raymond E. Ozzie mainly focuses on Database, World Wide Web, Computer security, Order and Data mining. His work on Data file as part of general Database study is frequently linked to Erasure, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of science. Raymond E. Ozzie does research in World Wide Web, focusing on Electronic messaging specifically.

His Computer security research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Keying and Information repository. His Data mining study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Search engine and Data science. His studies examine the connections between Cryptography and genetics, as well as such issues in Data security, with regards to Cloud computing and Search engine indexing.

His most cited work include:

  • Method and apparatus for activity-based collaboration by a computer system equipped with a communications manager (310 citations)
  • Personal data mining (297 citations)
  • Method and apparatus for providing attributes of a collaboration system in an operating system folder-based file system (266 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of study are World Wide Web, Database, Computer network, Information retrieval and Peer-to-peer. His World Wide Web research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Cloud computing and Rendering. His Cloud computing research focuses on Computer security and how it relates to Service.

His Database study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Core object and Data structure. The various areas that he examines in his Computer network study include Mode, Data transfer object and Transfer. His Information retrieval research focuses on Taxonomy and how it connects with Machine learning and Convergence.

He most often published in these fields:

  • World Wide Web (29.00%)
  • Database (17.00%)
  • Computer network (15.00%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2010-2015)?

  • Computer network (15.00%)
  • Field (3.00%)
  • Database (17.00%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of investigation include Computer network, Field, Database, Set and User interface. His Computer network research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Method, Data transfer object and Distributed object. His Field research incorporates elements of Telecommunications and Information technology.

His Database study also includes

  • Data feed that intertwine with fields like Service,
  • Shared object that connect with fields like World Wide Web. His World Wide Web research includes themes of Data access and Programmer. He works mostly in the field of User interface, limiting it down to topics relating to Host and, in certain cases, Metadata, as a part of the same area of interest.

Between 2010 and 2015, his most popular works were:

  • Scalable topical aggregation of data feeds (189 citations)
  • User perception of electronic messaging (79 citations)
  • Shared data collections (15 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Operating system
  • The Internet
  • Computer network

His scientific interests lie mostly in Database, World Wide Web, Scalability, Service and Distributed services. In general Database, his work in Data access is often linked to State, Mechanism and Data sharing linking many areas of study. His Electronic messaging study, which is part of a larger body of work in World Wide Web, is frequently linked to User perception, bridging the gap between disciplines.

His Scalability study incorporates themes from RSS and Data feed.

Best Publications

  • Method and apparatus for activity-based collaboration by a computer system equipped with a communications manager

    Raymond E. Ozzie;Kenneth G. Moore;Robert H. Myhill;Brian M. Lambert

  • Personal data mining

    Raymond E. Ozzie;William H. Gates;Gary W. Flake;Thomas F. Bergstraesser

  • Method and apparatus for providing attribute of collaboration system in operation system folder type file system

    George P Moromisato;ジョージ・ピー・モロミサト;Gregory S Klabish;グレゴリー・エス・クラビッシュ

  • Data security in an off-premise environment

    Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer;William H. Gates;Raymond E Ozzie;Thomas F. Bergstraesser

  • Method and apparatus for efficient management of XML documents

    Raymond E. Ozzie;Kenneth G. Moore;Ransom L. Richardson;Edward J. Fischer

  • Scalable topical aggregation of data feeds

    Raymond Ozzie;Eric Patey;Brian Lambert;George Moromisato

  • Method and apparatus for connecting a secure peer-to-peer collaboration system to an external system

    William E. Zircher;Jack E. Ozzie;Raymond E. Ozzie

  • Erasure coded storage aggregation in data centers

    Raymond E. Ozzie;John D. Mehr;Siddhartha Puri;Samuel J. McKelvie

  • User authentication management

    Raymond E. Ozzie;Jack E. Ozzie;Thomas A. Galvin;Eric M. Patey

  • Desktop search from mobile device

    Raymond E. Ozzie;Eric J. Horvitz;William H. Gates;Joshua T. Goodman

  • Off-premise encryption of data storage

    Raymond E Ozzie;William H. Gates;Thomas F. Bergstraesser;Lili Cheng

  • Electronic messaging tailored to user interest

    Dragos A. Manolescu;Matthew Jason Pope;Raymond E. Ozzie;Christopher H. Pratley

  • Visualization of participant relationships and sentiment for electronic messaging

    Dragos A. Manolescu;Matthew Jason Pope;Raymond E. Ozzie;Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer

  • Entity-specific search model

    Christopher D. Payne;Eric J. Horvitz;Alexander G. Gounares;Susan T. Dumais

  • Method and apparatus for prioritizing data change requests and maintaining data consistency in a distributed computer system equipped for activity-based collaboration

    Raymond E. Ozzie;Jack E. Ozzie

  • User perception of electronic messaging

    Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer;Dragos A. Manolescu;Matthew Jason Pope;Matthew B. MacLaurin

  • Remote provisioning of information technology

    Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer;William H. Gates;Raymond E. Ozzie;Gary W. Flake

  • Architecture for user- and context- specific prefetching and caching of information on portable devices

    Raymond E. Ozzie;Eric J. Horvitz;William H. Gates;Joshua T. Goodman

  • Providing remote user authentication

    Raymond E. Ozzie;Jack E. Ozzie;Thomas A. Galvin;Eric M. Patey

  • Collaborative generation of meeting minutes and agenda confirmation

    Pavel Curtis;Anoop Gupta;Bruce Johnson;Katherine J. Drakos

Frequent Co-Authors

Gary W. Flake
Gary W. Flake Independent Scientist / Consultant, US
Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer
Henricus Johannes Maria Meijer Microsoft (United States)
Alexander G. Gounares
Alexander G. Gounares Microsoft (United States)
Mary Czerwinski
Mary Czerwinski Microsoft (United States)
William H. Gates
William H. Gates Microsoft (United States)
Lili Cheng
Lili Cheng Microsoft (United States)
James R. Larus
James R. Larus École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Eric Horvitz
Eric Horvitz Microsoft (United States)
Chandramohan A. Thekkath
Chandramohan A. Thekkath Microsoft (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring computer science students have a wide range of online degree options to complement or expand their expertise. For those interested in cybersecurity, an online master's degree cyber security can provide specialized knowledge to protect digital systems, with flexible study options for working professionals.

Tech skills are also highly valued in sectors like construction and criminal justice. A bachelors construction management integrates project planning and technical solutions, opening doors to infrastructure and development roles. Meanwhile, earning a criminal justice degree online often includes coursework in cybersecurity and digital forensics, addressing the growing need for tech-savvy professionals in law enforcement and public safety.

Financial acumen is another valuable asset. An accounting degree online cost is typically competitive and can lead to careers in tech-driven finance roles such as data analytics or auditing. Exploring these online degrees can help broaden career pathways and provide greater flexibility to match your evolving interests in computer science and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Raymond E. Ozzie

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles