World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Oliver Hurst-Hiller

Oliver Hurst-Hiller

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 33 12539 5090 43 5628

Oliver Hurst-Hiller publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Oliver Hurst-Hiller between 2003 and 2012, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Oliver Hurst-Hiller published across 10 years, from 2003 to 2012, averaging 4.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2006. 3 of the 48 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2012. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2006. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 7 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 22 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 2 publications
2003 2012

48 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Oliver Hurst-Hiller: publications per year, 2003 to 2012
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 7
2005 11
2006 22
2007 4
2008 0
2009 0
2010 0
2011 1
2012 2
Total 48
Download as CSV

Oliver Hurst-Hiller publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oliver Hurst-Hiller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 42–51 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 43 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22 43
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Oliver Hurst-Hiller D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oliver Hurst-Hiller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983 33
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • World Wide Web
  • The Internet
  • Database

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Information retrieval, World Wide Web, Web search query, Component and Human–computer interaction. His study in the field of Query optimization and Sargable also crosses realms of Content. His World Wide Web study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Annotation and Media content.

His Web search query research includes elements of Query language and Query expansion. His Human–computer interaction research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Online advertising, Brick and mortar, Advertising and Presentation. His work on Data mining expands to the thematically related Query by Example.

His most cited work include:

  • System and method for annotating web-based document (487 citations)
  • Machine assisted query formulation (252 citations)
  • Searching for content using voice search queries (191 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Oliver Hurst-Hiller mainly investigates Information retrieval, World Wide Web, Web search query, Search engine and Data mining. When carried out as part of a general Information retrieval research project, his work on Search analytics is frequently linked to work in State, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of study. His work in the fields of World Wide Web, such as Web page and Hyperlink, intersects with other areas such as Component, Architecture and Event.

His work in the fields of Web search query, such as Web query classification, overlaps with other areas such as Multi dimensional search. The study incorporates disciplines such as Query language, Query by Example, Sargable and Query optimization in addition to Web query classification. He has included themes like Relevance, Index and Social network in his Search engine study.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Information retrieval (62.22%)
  • World Wide Web (35.56%)
  • Web search query (28.89%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2006-2013)?

  • Information retrieval (62.22%)
  • Web search query (28.89%)
  • Sargable (11.11%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of investigation include Information retrieval, Web search query, Sargable, Query optimization and RDF query language. The various areas that he examines in his Information retrieval study include The Internet and Dialog box. His Web search query research includes themes of Query language, Data mining and Query expansion.

Between 2006 and 2013, his most popular works were:

  • Machine assisted query formulation (252 citations)
  • Voice-based search processing (171 citations)
  • Incremental query refinement (161 citations)

Best Publications

  • System and method for annotating web-based document

    Matthew Rubin Lerner;Oliver Hurst-Hiller;Jesse Gardner Kocher;David Keel Peck

  • Machine assisted query formulation

    John C. Platt;Gary W. Flake;Ramez Naam;Anoop Gupta

  • Searching for content using voice search queries

    Oliver Hurst-Hiller;Julia H Farago

  • Searching an index of media content

    Oliver Hurst-Hiller;Julia Farago

  • Voice-based search processing

    John C. Platt;Gary W. Flake;Ramez Naam;Anoop Gupta

  • Incremental query refinement

    Brett D. Brewer;Oliver Hurst-Hiller

  • Desktop search from mobile device

    Raymond E. Ozzie;Eric J. Horvitz;William H. Gates;Joshua T. Goodman

  • Visual and multi-dimensional search

    Stephen Lawler;Eric J. Horvitz;Joshua T. Goodman;Anoop Gupta

  • Employment of offline behavior to display online content

    Gary W. Flake;William H. Gates;Eric J. Horvitz;Joshua T. Goodman

  • System and method for generating alternative search terms

    Brett Brewer;Eric Watson;Eric Brill;James Dai

  • Using offline activity to enhance online searching

    Gary W. Flake;William H. Gates;Eric J. Horvitz;Joshua T. Goodman

  • Presentation-level content filtering for a search result

    Oliver Hurst-Hiller;Jamie Paul Buckley

  • Web-based targeted advertising in a brick-and-mortar retail establishment using online customer information

    Xuedong D. Huang;William H. Gates;Eric J. Horvitz;Joshua T. Goodman

  • System and method for a unified and blended search

    Oliver Hurst-Hiller;Eric B. Watson;Eddie L. Mays

  • Entity-specific search model

    Christopher D. Payne;Eric J. Horvitz;Alexander G. Gounares;Susan T. Dumais

  • Context-based search, retrieval, and awareness

    Susan T. Dumais;Kyle G. Peltonen;Anoop Gupta;Bradly A. Brunell

  • Consolidating local and remote taxonomies

    Oliver Hurst-Hiller;Michael I. Torres;Jane T. Kim

  • Search results injected into client applications

    Oliver Hurst-Hiller;Srinivasa V. Thirumalai-Anandanpillai;Neel I. Murarka;Marek L. Gorecki

  • Search engine that identifies and uses social networks in communications, retrieval, and electronic commerce

    Christopher A. Meek;Eric J. Horvitz;Joshua T. Goodman;Gary W. Flake

  • Architecture for user- and context- specific prefetching and caching of information on portable devices

    Raymond E. Ozzie;Eric J. Horvitz;William H. Gates;Joshua T. Goodman

Frequent Co-Authors

Gary W. Flake
Gary W. Flake Independent Scientist / Consultant, US
Eric Horvitz
Eric Horvitz Microsoft (United States)
Joshua T. Goodman
Joshua T. Goodman Microsoft (United States)
William H. Gates
William H. Gates Microsoft (United States)
John Platt
John Platt Google (United States)
Eric Brill
Eric Brill Microsoft (United States)
Xuedong Huang
Xuedong Huang Microsoft (United States)
Raymond E. Ozzie
Raymond E. Ozzie Microsoft (United States)
Christopher A. Meek
Christopher A. Meek Microsoft (United States)
Alexander G. Gounares
Alexander G. Gounares Microsoft (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens up diverse educational and career pathways, many of which you can pursue online. Flexibility, affordability, and speed are key factors students consider when choosing a degree program.

For those seeking to broaden their business and technical expertise, cheapest online mba programs offer a cost-effective way to boost credentials and prepare for management roles in tech. Additionally, professionals eager to upskill quickly often consider the quickest degree to get online, which can open doors to well-paying tech positions in a shorter time frame.

If you want to specialize further, the best one year masters programs deliver advanced knowledge without a multi-year commitment. For those interested in cutting-edge technology, the best ai masters programs online provide focused training in artificial intelligence, opening up high-demand job opportunities.

Whether you aim to climb the career ladder quickly or deepen your expertise affordably, there are online programs tailored to your ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Oliver Hurst-Hiller

Recently Published Articles