World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
36
Citations
3718
World Ranking
8831
National Ranking
2452

Robert Lee Angell publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Lee Angell sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 83 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Robert Lee Angell D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Lee Angell sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Marketing
  • Information technology

Robert Lee Angell focuses on Set, Marketing, Customer reference program, Customer intelligence and Cohort. His Set study spans across into areas like Data mining, USable, Computer program and Artificial intelligence. His Data mining research incorporates themes from Object, Digital video, Video based and Set.

While the research belongs to areas of Customer reference program, Robert Lee Angell spends his time largely on the problem of Voice of the customer, intersecting his research to questions surrounding Conversion marketing. His Cohort research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Event, Metadata and Pattern recognition. The various areas that Robert Lee Angell examines in his Metadata study include Respiratory system and Emergency medicine.

His most cited work include:

  • Automatic generation of new rules for processing synthetic events using computer-based learning processes (76 citations)
  • Synthetic Events For Real Time Patient Analysis (72 citations)
  • Method and apparatus for identifying customer behavioral types from a continuous video stream for use in optimizing loss leader merchandizing (72 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Robert Lee Angell mainly investigates Set, Data mining, Metadata, Cohort and USable. His Set study overlaps with Computer program, Product, Marketing, Personalized marketing and Artificial intelligence. His study brings together the fields of Event and Data mining.

His Metadata research also works with subjects such as

  • Digital video that intertwine with fields like Video based,
  • Facial expression most often made with reference to Set. The study incorporates disciplines such as Inference engine and Risk assessment in addition to Cohort. His USable research spans across into areas like Process, Event data and Program code.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Set (58.59%)
  • Data mining (37.37%)
  • Metadata (24.24%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2007-2017)?

  • Set (58.59%)
  • Data mining (37.37%)
  • Cohort (23.23%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His scientific interests lie mostly in Set, Data mining, Cohort, Computer program and Metadata. Set is intertwined with Product, Artificial intelligence, Medical literature, Analytics and Medical physics in his research. His studies in Artificial intelligence integrate themes in fields like Digital video, Computer vision and Pattern recognition.

His studies deal with areas such as Event and Biometrics as well as Data mining. His study in Cohort is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Inference engine and Risk assessment. His work carried out in the field of Metadata brings together such families of science as Digital sensors, Program code, Respiratory system and Emergency medicine.

Between 2007 and 2017, his most popular works were:

  • Automatic generation of new rules for processing synthetic events using computer-based learning processes (76 citations)
  • Synthetic Events For Real Time Patient Analysis (72 citations)
  • Detecting behavioral deviations by measuring respiratory patterns in cohort groups (59 citations)

Best Publications

  • Method and apparatus for presenting disincentive marketing content to a customer based on a customer risk assessment

    Robert Lee Angell;James R. Kraemer

  • Identifying customer behavioral types from a continuous video stream for use in optimizing loss leader merchandizing

    Robert Lee Angell;James R. Kraemer

  • Method and apparatus for using biometric data for a customer to improve upsale and cross-sale of items

    Robert Lee Angell;James R. Kraemer

  • Method and apparatus for identifying unexpected behavior of a customer in a retail environment using detected location data, temperature, humidity, lighting conditions, music, and odors

    Robert Lee Angell;James R. Kraemer

  • Generating a customer risk assessment using dynamic customer data

    Robert Lee Angell;James R. Kraemer

  • Generating customized marketing messages for a customer using dynamic customer behavior data

    Robert Lee Angell;James R. Kraemer

  • Generating Generalized Risk Cohorts

    Robert Lee Angell;Robert R. Friedlander;James R. Kraemer

  • Automatic generation of new rules for processing synthetic events using computer-based learning processes

    Robert Lee Angell;Robert R. Friedlander;James R. Kraemer

  • Method and apparatus for decision tree based marketing and selling for a retail store

    Robert Lee Angell;James R. Kraemer

  • Method and apparatus for ranking a customer using dynamically generated external data

    Robert Lee Angell;James R. Kraemer

  • Synthetic Events For Real Time Patient Analysis

    Robert Lee Angell;Robert R. Friedlander;James R. Kraemer

  • Detecting behavioral deviations by measuring respiratory patterns in cohort groups

    Robert Lee Angell;James R. Kraemer

  • Recipe and project based marketing and guided selling in a retail store environment

    Robert Lee Angell;James R. Kraemer

  • Generating customized marketing messages using automatically generated customer identification data

    Robert Lee Angell;James R. Kraemer

  • Detecting behavioral deviations by measuring eye movements

    Robert Lee Angell;James R. Kraemer

  • Generating Cohorts Based on Attributes of Objects Identified Using Video Input

    Robert Lee Angell;Sergio Borger;Robert R. Friedlander;James R. Kraemer

  • Sensor and actuator based validation of expected cohort

    Robert Lee Angell;Robert R. Friedlander;James R. Kraemer

  • Method and apparatus for implementing digital video modeling to generate an expected behavior model

    Robert Lee Angell;James R. Kraemer

  • Method and apparatus for determining profitability of customer groups identified from a continuous video stream

    Robert Lee Angell;James R. Kraemer

  • Automatically generating an optimal marketing model for marketing products to customers

    Robert Lee Angell;James R. Kraemer

  • Method and apparatus for automatically identifying potentially unsafe work conditions to predict and prevent the occurrence of workplace accidents

    Robert Lee Angell;James R. Kraemer

Frequent Co-Authors

James R. Kraemer
James R. Kraemer IBM (United States)
Robert R. Friedlander
Robert R. Friedlander IBM (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Robert Lee Angell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles