World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
59
Citations
13805
World Ranking
3427
National Ranking
1658

Joshua T. Goodman publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joshua T. Goodman sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 100 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Joshua T. Goodman D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joshua T. Goodman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joshua T. Goodman is affiliated with Microsoft in the United States. Their research spans several interdisciplinary fields, integrating aspects of mathematics, social sciences, and business, management, and accounting.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Mathematics
  • Social Sciences
  • Business, Management and Accounting

In terms of subfields, their work specifically addresses:

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Education
  • Accounting

Joshua T. Goodman has contributed to topics such as:

  • Statistics Education and Methodologies
  • Innovations in Educational Methods
  • Accounting Education and Careers

Their recent academic contributions include the paper titled Equating with Small and Unbalanced Samples, published in 2020 in the journal Applied Measurement in Education. This publication has been cited multiple times within the academic community.

Their frequent co-authors are:

  • Andrew Dallas
  • Fen Fan

Joshua T. Goodman has published primarily in the venue Applied Measurement in Education, which corresponds with their focused interest in education and measurement methodologies.

Best Publications

  • An Empirical Study of Smoothing Techniques for Language Modeling

    Unknown

  • A bit of progress in language modeling

    Unknown

  • Finding advertising keywords on web pages

    Wen-tau Yih;Joshua Goodman;Vitor R. Carvalho

  • Machine assisted query formulation

    John C. Platt;Gary W. Flake;Ramez Naam;Anoop Gupta

  • Content-targeted advertising for interactive computer-based applications

    Joshua Goodman;Christopher Meek;Carl Kadie

  • Exponential priors for maximum entropy models

    Joshua T. Goodman

  • Language modeling for soft keyboards

    Joshua Goodman;Gina Venolia;Keith Steury;Chauncey Parker

  • Phishing Detection, Prevention, and Notification

    Joshua T. Goodman;Paul S Rehfuss;Robert L. Rounthwaite;Manav Mishra

  • Spam and the ongoing battle for the inbox

    Joshua Goodman;Gordon V. Cormack;David Heckerman

  • Semiring parsing

    Joshua Goodman

  • Desktop search from mobile device

    Raymond E. Ozzie;Eric J. Horvitz;William H. Gates;Joshua T. Goodman

  • Searching based on messages

    Kristin D. Bromm;Denise D. Hui;Joshua T. Goodman;Omar H. Shahine

  • Visual and multi-dimensional search

    Stephen Lawler;Eric J. Horvitz;Joshua T. Goodman;Anoop Gupta

  • Employment of offline behavior to display online content

    Gary W. Flake;William H. Gates;Eric J. Horvitz;Joshua T. Goodman

  • Viral advertising for interactive services

    Joshua T. Goodman;Christopher A. Meek;Carl M. Kadie

  • Toward a unified approach to statistical language modeling for Chinese

    Jianfeng Gao;Joshua Goodman;Mingjing Li;Kai-Fu Lee

  • Multi-document summarization by maximizing informative content-words

    Wen-tau Yih;Joshua Goodman;Lucy Vanderwende;Hisami Suzuki

  • Spam filtering with probabilistic secure hashes

    Geoffrey J. Hulten;Joshua T. Goodman;Robert L. Rounthwaite;Manav Mishra

  • Reputation data for entities and data processing

    Gary W. Flake;Eric J. Horvitz;John C. Platt;Joshua T. Goodman

  • Using offline activity to enhance online searching

    Gary W. Flake;William H. Gates;Eric J. Horvitz;Joshua T. Goodman

  • Spell checking for text input via reduced keypad keys

    Joshua T. Goodman;Gina D. Venolia

  • Web-based targeted advertising in a brick-and-mortar retail establishment using online customer information

    Xuedong D. Huang;William H. Gates;Eric J. Horvitz;Joshua T. Goodman

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric Horvitz
Eric Horvitz Microsoft (United States)
Gary W. Flake
Gary W. Flake Independent Scientist / Consultant, US
William H. Gates
William H. Gates Microsoft (United States)
Robert L. Rounthwaite
Robert L. Rounthwaite Microsoft (United States)
Christopher A. Meek
Christopher A. Meek Microsoft (United States)
Alexander G. Gounares
Alexander G. Gounares Microsoft (United States)
John Platt
John Platt Google (United States)
Xuedong Huang
Xuedong Huang Microsoft (United States)
Raymond E. Ozzie
Raymond E. Ozzie Microsoft (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the demand for tech professionals rises, many students are now considering flexible ways to earn a degree and build their careers. If you’re interested in combining computer science studies with broader STEM fields, there are several online options worth exploring.

For those curious about interdisciplinary opportunities, understanding what can you get with an environmental science degree can reveal paths that blend computing with environmental problem-solving and research.

Online programs make advanced education accessible. The computer science degree online route allows students to learn programming, data science, and algorithms from anywhere, often at an accelerated pace.

Aspirants to engineering fields should also consider complementary degrees. Pursuing an environmental engineering degree online or exploring online mechanical engineering degrees can open doors to careers in sustainable infrastructure, robotics, and technology development.

Whether you’re looking for affordability, flexibility, or a pathway that merges tech with other fields, these related online degree programs offer multiple routes to a rewarding career.

Best Scientists Citing Joshua T. Goodman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles