What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Law
- Social science
- Management
His primary areas of study are Accounting, Audit, Public relations, Chief audit executive and Argument.
His work in the fields of Accounting, such as Audit committee, intersects with other areas such as Third line.
His work carried out in the field of Audit brings together such families of science as Accountability, Order, Consolidation, Impartiality and Institutionalisation.
His Public relations research includes elements of Superficiality, Performance measurement, Independence and Representation.
Yves Gendron has researched Chief audit executive in several fields, including Administration, Accounting research and New public management.
His work is dedicated to discovering how Argument, Space are connected with Action, Consistency, Power and Control and other disciplines.
His most cited work include:
- The organizational context of professionalism in accounting (272 citations)
- On the constitution of audit committee effectiveness (234 citations)
- Strengthening the Financial Reporting System: Can Audit Committees Deliver? (194 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His main research concerns Public relations, Accounting, Audit, Accounting research and Legitimacy.
His research integrates issues of Chief audit executive, Corporate governance and Set in his study of Public relations.
His work deals with themes such as Qualitative research, Field and Finance, which intersect with Accounting.
His Audit study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Control, Consolidation, Accountability and Professional association.
His Accounting research research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Social constructionism, Constitution, Michel foucault and Openness to experience.
His Legitimacy research incorporates themes from Neoliberalism, Governmentality and Credibility.
He most often published in these fields:
- Public relations (49.57%)
- Accounting (40.17%)
- Audit (24.79%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?
- Public relations (49.57%)
- Positive economics (7.69%)
- Accounting (40.17%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Public relations, Positive economics, Accounting, Ethos and Credibility.
Yves Gendron integrates several fields in his works, including Public relations and Perspective.
The Positive economics study combines topics in areas such as Social constructionism, Accounting research, Gatekeeping, Boundary and Field.
His research integrates issues of Qualitative research, Emulation and Premise in his study of Accounting.
His Ethos study incorporates themes from Order, Persuasion and Rationality.
His Action study deals with Corporate governance intersecting with Risk management.
Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Interview-based research in accounting 2000–2014: Informal norms, translation and vibrancy (27 citations)
- Desingularization and Dequalification: A Foray Into Ranking Production and Utilization Processes (8 citations)
- Building the Legitimacy of Whistleblowers: A Multi‐Case Discourse Analysis (7 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Law
- Social science
- Management
Yves Gendron spends much of his time researching Framing, Public relations, Accounting, Positive economics and Premise.
His Framing study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Legitimacy, Social issues and Personality.
His work deals with themes such as Employability, Social work and Beneficiary, which intersect with Public relations.
Yves Gendron interconnects Autonomy, Heteronomy and Emulation in the investigation of issues within Accounting.
He has researched Positive economics in several fields, including Gatekeeping, Accounting research, Boundary and Field.
His Premise study typically links adjacent topics like Qualitative research.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
