World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 33 2472 2332 972 899 84 5437
Economics and Finance 33 3254 2960 1764 1556 85 5445

Kathryn Kadous publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kathryn Kadous between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kathryn Kadous published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 2.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2021. 4 of the 90 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2021. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 5 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 2 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 1 publication 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication
1995 2025

90 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kathryn Kadous: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 2
1997 2
1998 0
1999 1
2000 2
2001 5
2002 0
2003 3
2004 4
2005 3
2006 1
2007 1
2008 5
2009 1
2010 2
2011 5
2012 7
2013 4
2014 3
2015 3
2016 4
2017 5
2018 2
2019 4
2020 4
2021 10
2022 1
2023 1
2024 3
2025 1
Total 90
Download as CSV

Kathryn Kadous publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathryn Kadous sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 80–84 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 84 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116 84
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Kathryn Kadous D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathryn Kadous sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161 33
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Kathryn Kadous is affiliated with Emory University in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in the fields of Business, Management, and Accounting, as well as Social Sciences. Their work focuses heavily on topics related to auditing, earnings management, and governance, with additional attention to experimental behavioral economics studies, accounting and organizational management, ethics in business and education, decision-making and behavioral economics, software engineering research, and accounting education and careers.

Their recent publications reflect a strong emphasis on auditing and behavioral aspects within accounting. Notable papers include:

  • Theory Testing and Process Evidence in Accounting Experiments, 2021, The Accounting Review
  • Improving Complex Audit Judgments: A Framework and Evidence, 2020, Contemporary Accounting Research
  • Do Managers' Nonnative Accents Influence Investment Decisions?, 2021, The Accounting Review
  • Friends in low places: How peer advice and expected leadership feedback affect staff auditors' willingness to speak up, 2020, Accounting Organizations and Society
  • The Sounds of Silence: A Framework, Theory, and Empirical Evidence of Audit Team Voice, 2021, Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory

Kathryn Kadous collaborates frequently with several co-authors, including Chad A. Proell, Lisa Koonce, Emily E. Griffith, Shana Clor-Proell, and Bart Dierynck. These collaborations support Kadous's contributions across multiple research projects in accounting and auditing.

The researcher's work is prominently published in several academic venues, with the most frequent being The Accounting Review. Other notable venues include Accounting Organizations and Society, SSRN Electronic Journal, Contemporary Accounting Research, and Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory.

Their subfields of study highlight specific areas within their broader research scope, such as Accounting, Management Information Systems, Safety Research, Information Systems and Management, and General Decision Sciences. This demonstrates an interdisciplinary approach connecting accounting practices with behavioral and information systems research.

Best Publications

  • Audits of Complex Estimates as Verification of Management Numbers: How Institutional Pressures Shape Practice

    Emily E. Griffith;Jacqueline S. Hammersley;Kathryn Kadous

  • The Effect of Quality Assessment and Directional Goal Commitment on Auditors' Acceptance of Client‐Preferred Accounting Methods

    Kathryn Kadous;S. Jane Kennedy;Mark E. Peecher

  • Auditor Mindsets and Audits of Complex Estimates

    Emily E. Griffith;Jacqueline S. Hammersley;Kathryn Kadous;Donald Young

  • The Effects of Audit Quality and Consequence Severity on Juror Evaluations of Auditor Responsibility for Plaintiff Losses

    Kathryn Kadous

  • Grounding the professional skepticism construct in mindset and attitude theory: A way forward

    Christine J. Nolder;Kathryn Kadous

  • Improving Jurors' Evaluations of Auditors in Negligence Cases*

    Kathryn Kadous

  • How Do Auditors Weight Informal Contrary Advice? The Joint Influence of Advisor Social Bond and Advice Justifiability

    Kathryn Kadous;Justin Leiby;Mark E. Peecher

  • Do Effects of Client Preference on Accounting Professionals' Information Search and Subsequent Judgments Persist with High Practice Risk?

    Kathryn Kadous;Anne M. Magro;Brian C. Spilker

  • Can Reporting Norms Create a Safe Harbor? Jury Verdicts against Auditors under Precise and Imprecise Accounting Standards

    Kathryn Kadous;Molly Mercer

  • Quantification and Persuasion in Managerial Judgement

    Kathryn Kadous;Lisa L Koonce;Kristy L. Towry

  • How Do Audit Seniors Respond to Heightened Fraud Risk

    Jacqueline S. Hammersley;Karla M. Johnstone;Kathryn Kadous

  • Contracting on Contemporaneous versus Forward‐Looking Measures: An Experimental Investigation*

    Anne M. Farrell;Kathryn Kadous;Kristy L. Towry

  • How Insights from the “New” JDM Research Can Improve Auditor Judgment: Fundamental Research Questions and Methodological Advice

    Emily E. Griffith;Kathryn Kadous;Donald Young

  • The Role of Incentives to Manage Earnings and Quantification in Auditors' Evaluations of Management‐Provided Information

    Urton Anderson;Kathryn Kadous;Lisa Koonce

  • Using Counter‐Explanation to Limit Analysts' Forecast Optimism

    Kathryn Kadous;Susan D. Krische;Lisa M. Sedor

  • Do Financial Statement Users Judge Relevance Based on Properties of Reliability

    Kathryn Kadous;Lisa L. Koonce;Jane M. Thayer

  • The Effect of Quality Assessment and Directional Goal Commitment on Auditors' Acceptance of Client-Preferred Accounting Methods

    Kathryn Kadous;S. Jane Kennedy Jollineau;S. Jane Kennedy Jollineau;Mark E. Peecher

  • The Efficacy of Third-Party Consultation in Preventing Managerial Escalation of Commitment: The Role of Mental Representations Discussion of "The Efficacy of Third-Party Consultation in Preventing Managerial Escalation of Commitment: The Role

    Kathryn Kadous;Lisa M. Sedor;Hun-Tong Tan

  • How Does Intrinsic Motivation Improve Auditor Judgment in Complex Audit Tasks

    Kathryn Kadous;Yuepin (Daniel) Zhou

  • Is There Safety in Numbers? The Effects of Forecast Accuracy and Forecast Boldness on Financial Analysts' Credibility with Investors*

    Kathryn Kadous;Molly Mercer;Jane Thayer

  • Theory Testing and Process Evidence in Accounting Experiments

    H. Scott Asay;Ryan Guggenmos;Ryan Guggenmos;Kathryn Kadous;Lisa Koonce

  • Auditor Mindsets and Audits of Complex Estimates

    Emily E. Griffith;Jacqueline S. Hammersley;Kathryn Kadous;Donald Young

  • Quantification and Persuasion in Managerial Judgment

    Kathryn Kadous;Lisa Koonce;Kristy L. Towry

Frequent Co-Authors

Lisa Koonce
Lisa Koonce The University of Texas at Austin
Karla M. Johnstone
Karla M. Johnstone University of Wisconsin–Madison
Robert Libby
Robert Libby Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Economics and Finance can open doors to a wide range of online degree options and career directions. Many students look beyond traditional programs to boost their leadership and analytical skills from anywhere in the world.

For those interested in leading teams and driving organizational efficiency, an online master's organizational leadership program is a popular choice. This degree focuses on people management, decision-making, and strategy—key skills in both economics and finance sectors.

If data-driven insights and analytics excite you, there are business intelligence and analytics online programs available. These programs blend technology and business knowledge, preparing graduates to interpret financial trends and make evidence-based decisions.

Many working professionals prefer MBAs that lower barriers to entry. Consider a flexible mba no gre for added convenience and faster application. Additionally, budget-friendly mba programs under 30k make advanced credentials in finance and economics more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Kathryn Kadous

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles