World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
39
Citations
9002
World Ranking
1733
National Ranking
723

Economics and Finance

D-Index
38
Citations
8966
World Ranking
2509
National Ranking
1412

Mark W. Nelson publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark W. Nelson sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 80 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Mark W. Nelson D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark W. Nelson sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark W. Nelson is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Business, Management, and Accounting, with a significant emphasis on the subfields of Accounting, Management Information Systems, Public Administration, and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management.

Their work encompasses several main topics, including:

  • Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
  • Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Financial Reporting and XBRL
  • Accounting and Organizational Management

Mark W. Nelson has published their research in different academic venues, most notably:

  • The Accounting Review
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Among the recently published papers by Mark W. Nelson are:

  • "Experimental and Archival Research in Auditing: Complementarities, Convergence, and Future Directions," 2025, SSRN Electronic Journal
  • "Experimental and Archival Research in Auditing: Complementarities, Convergence, and Future Directions," 2025, The Accounting Review
  • "It's Not Only What You Say... How Communication Style and Team Culture Affect Audit Issue Follow-Up and Auditor Performance Evaluations," 2021, The Accounting Review (authored by Chad A. Proell with involvement)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Mark W. Nelson include:

  • Chad A. Proell
  • Yuepin Zhou

The research contributions of Mark W. Nelson span both experimental and archival methods in auditing, exploring how communication styles and team culture influence audit performance alongside broader governance and earnings management issues. Their work also extends into public policy and administrative research, reflecting an interdisciplinary approach to accounting and organizational studies.

Best Publications

  • Evidence from Auditors about Managers' and Auditors' Earnings Management Decisions

    Mark W. Nelson;John A. Elliott;Robin L. Tarpley

  • Experimental research in financial accounting

    Robert Libby;Robert Bloomfield;Mark W Nelson

  • A Model and Literature Review of Professional Skepticism in Auditing

    Mark W. Nelson

  • Judgment and Decision Making Research in Auditing: A Task, Person, and Interpersonal Interaction Perspective

    Mark Nelson;Hun‐Tong Tan

  • Behavioral Evidence on the Effects of Principles‐ and Rules‐Based Standards

    Mark W. Nelson

  • How Are Earnings Managed? Examples from Auditors

    Mark W. Nelson;John A. Elliott;Robin L. Tarpley

  • Judgment and Decision Making Research in Auditing: A Task, Person, and Interpersonal Interaction Perspective

    Unknown

  • Gathering Data for Archival, Field, Survey, and Experimental Accounting Research

    Robert Bloomfield;Mark W. Nelson;Eugene F. Soltes

  • The ability of professional standards to mitigate aggressive reporting

    Andrew D. Cuccia;Mark W. Nelson;Karl Hackenbrack

  • Recognition v. Disclosure, Auditor Tolerance for Misstatement, and the Reliability of Stock-Compensation and Lease Information

    Robert Libby;Mark W. Nelson;James E. Hunton

  • Evidence from Auditors about Managers' and Auditors' Earnings-Management Decisions

    Mark W. Nelson;John A. Elliott;Robin L. Tarpley

  • Experimental Research in Financial Accounting

    Robert Libby;Robert J. Bloomfield;Mark W. Nelson

  • Ameliorating Conflicts Of Interest In Auditing: Effects Of Recent Reforms On Auditors And Their Clients

    Mark W. Nelson

  • Confidence and the welfare of less-informed investors

    Robert Bloomfield;Robert Libby;Mark W. Nelson

  • Underreactions, overreactions and moderated confidence

    Robert Bloomfield;Robert Libby;Mark W. Nelson

  • The effect of ambiguity on loss contingency reporting judgments

    Mark W. Nelson;William R Kinney

  • Knowledge structure and the estimation of conditional probabilities in audit planning

    Robert Libby;Mark W. Nelson

  • Using Decision Aids to Improve Auditors' Conditional Probability Judgments

    Sarah E. Bonner;Robert Libby;Mark W. Nelson

  • The Effect of Quantitative Materiality Approach on Auditors' Adjustment Decisions

    Mark W. Nelson;Steven D. Smith;Zoe‐Vonna Palmrose

  • Team-Oriented Leadership and Auditors' Willingness to Raise Audit Issues

    Mark W. Nelson;Chad A. Proell;Amy E. Randel

  • A Model and Literature Review of Professional Skepticism in Auditing

    Mark W. Nelson

  • Conflicts of interest: Challenges and solutions in business, law, medicine, and public policy.

    Don A. Moore;Daylian M. Cain;George Loewenstein;Max H. Bazerman

  • The effects of error frequency and accounting knowledge on error diagnosis in analytical review

    Mark W. Nelson

  • The Effect of Information Strength and Weight on Behavior in Financial Markets

    Mark W. Nelson;Robert Bloomfield;Jeffrey W. Hales;Robert Libby

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert Libby
Robert Libby Cornell University
Robert J. Bloomfield
Robert J. Bloomfield Cornell University
William R. Kinney
William R. Kinney The University of Texas at Austin
Hun-Tong Tan
Hun-Tong Tan Nanyang Technological University
Douglas J. Skinner
Douglas J. Skinner University of Chicago
James E. Hunton
James E. Hunton Bentley University
Charles M.C. Lee
Charles M.C. Lee Stanford University
Joseph V. Carcello
Joseph V. Carcello University of Tennessee at Knoxville

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Economics and Finance, expanding your expertise with an additional online degree can unlock varied career paths. Many students pursue a masters in organizational leadership online to develop essential management and leadership skills. This pathway is ideal if you want to complement your financial knowledge with the ability to lead teams and manage organizational change.

Data-driven roles are also rapidly growing. With a master business intelligence, you can build expertise in data analytics, reporting, and business strategy—making you highly valuable in the finance sector.

If you are looking for broad business skills, enrolling in an mba program online is a popular option and can dramatically improve your competitiveness in the job market. Many programs now waive traditional testing requirements, making them more accessible.

Cost is a crucial factor to consider. Fortunately, there are affordable options like an online mba under 40k, allowing you to enhance your qualifications without overwhelming student debt. Exploring these alternatives can open a wide array of leadership and analytical roles in economics and finance.

Best Scientists Citing Mark W. Nelson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles