World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
38
Citations
12091
World Ranking
1807
National Ranking
746

Economics and Finance

D-Index
37
Citations
12022
World Ranking
2602
National Ranking
1450

William R. Kinney publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William R. Kinney sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 79 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

William R. Kinney D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William R. Kinney sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Overview

William R. Kinney is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States.

Their recent research contributions span both business and medical fields, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach. The primary fields of study include Business, Management and Accounting as well as Medicine, with particular focus on subfields such as Accounting, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science, and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty.

Their published work appears in several academic journals, including:

  • Journal of Accounting and Economics
  • Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory
  • Journal of Chiropractic Medicine

Notable recent papers by William R. Kinney include:

  • "Nonoperative Management of Lateral Epicondyle Tendinopathy: An Umbrella Review," 2023, Journal of Chiropractic Medicine
  • "Assurance level choice, CPA fees, and financial reporting benefits: Inferences from U.S. private firms," 2022, Journal of Accounting and Economics
  • "Communicating Assurance Using Practitioner-Customized Procedures: An Experiment and Emerging Research Opportunities," 2020, Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory

The research topics they address involve both accounting and clinical medical concerns. Main topics include:

  • Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
  • Financial Reporting and Valuation Research
  • Corporate Finance and Governance
  • Risk Perception and Management
  • Risk and Safety Analysis
  • Tendon Structure and Treatment
  • Shoulder Injury and Treatment

Their collaborative work features multiple frequent coauthors, including:

  • Brad A. Badertscher
  • Jaewoo Kim
  • Edward Owens
  • Sandra C. Vera-Muñoz
  • Lisa Milici Gaynor

The diversity of William R. Kinney's fields and topics demonstrates an intersection between business accounting practices and clinical medical research, particularly in orthopedic conditions.

Best Publications

  • Capital market seasonality: The case of stock returns

    Michael S. Rozeff;William R. Kinney

  • The Effect of SOX Internal Control Deficiencies and Their Remediation on Accrual Quality

    Hollis Ashbaugh‐Skaife;Daniel W. Collins;William R. Kinney;Ryan LaFond

  • The discovery and reporting of internal control deficiencies prior to SOX-mandated audits

    Hollis Ashbaugh-Skaife;Daniel W. Collins;William R. Kinney

  • The Effect of SOX Internal Control Deficiencies on Firm Risk and Cost of Equity

    Hollis Ashbaugh-Skaife;Daniel W. Collins;William R. Kinney;Ryan Lafond

  • Auditor Independence, Non‐Audit Services, and Restatements: Was the U.S. Government Right?

    William R. Kinney;Zoe-Vonna Palmrose;Susan Scholz

  • Characteristics of firms correcting previously reported quarterly earnings

    William R. Kinney;Linda S. McDaniel

  • The Discovery and Reporting of Internal Control Deficiencies Prior to SOX-Mandated Audits

    Hollis Ashbaugh Skaife;Daniel W. Collins;William R. Kinney

  • Earnings Surprise “Materiality” as Measured by Stock Returns

    William R Kinney;David Burgstahler;Roger Martin

  • Discussion of The Relation between Auditors' Fees for Nonaudit Services and Earnings Management

    William R. Kinney;Robert Libby

  • Does Mandated Audit Communication Reduce Opportunistic Corrections to Manage Earnings to Forecasts

    Robert Libby;William R. Kinney

  • The Effect of SOX Internal Control Deficiencies and Their Remediation on Accrual Quality

    Hollis Ashbaugh Skaife;Daniel W. Collins;William R. Kinney;Ryan LaFond

  • The Effect of SOX Internal Control Deficiencies on Firm Risk and Cost of Equity

    Hollis Ashbaugh Skaife;Daniel W. Collins;William R. Kinney;Ryan LaFond

  • Audit technology and preferences for auditing standards

    William R. Kinney

  • Predicting Earnings: Entity versus Subentity Data

    William R. Kinney

  • The effect of ambiguity on loss contingency reporting judgments

    Mark W. Nelson;William R Kinney

  • Public Equity and Audit Pricing in the United States

    Brad A. Badertscher;Bjorn N. Jorgensen;Sharon Katz;William R. Kinney

  • Twenty‐Five Years of Audit Deregulation and Re‐Regulation: What Does it Mean for 2005 and Beyond?

    William R. Kinney

  • Research Opportunities in Internal Control Quality and Quality Assurance

    William R. Kinney

  • Do Control Effectiveness Disclosures Require SOX 404(b) Internal Control Audits? A Natural Experiment with Small U.S. Public Companies

    William R. Kinney;Marcy L. Shepardson

  • The Effects of Domain Experience and Task Presentation Format on Accountants' Information Relevance Assurance

    Sandra C. Vera‐Mun˜oz;William R. Kinney;Sarah E. Bonner

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel W. Collins
Daniel W. Collins University of Iowa
Robert Libby
Robert Libby Cornell University
Mark W. Nelson
Mark W. Nelson Cornell University
Jean C. Bedard
Jean C. Bedard Bentley University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Economics and Finance can open doors to diverse online degrees and lucrative career pathways. Many students and professionals are now pursuing flexible graduate programs to keep up with industry demands and stay ahead in the job market.

For those interested in data-driven decision making, the business intelligence masters offers advanced skills in analytics, data management, and strategic insights – all increasingly valued in finance and economics roles.

If you wish to enhance your business acumen, but dread extensive admission processes, consider an online mba without gmat requirements. These programs appeal to working professionals seeking leadership positions, saving time and removing standardized test barriers.

Affordability is another key consideration. Choosing an online mba under 30000 provides access to high-quality education at a lower financial commitment, making it easier to balance cost and career advancement.

Emerging fields like digital marketing also provide attractive new roles for economics and finance graduates. Earning a social media marketing certification degree can expand your expertise and increase job prospects in today’s tech-driven economy.

Best Scientists Citing William R. Kinney

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles