World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
59
Citations
37590
World Ranking
844
National Ranking
528

Charles M.C. Lee publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles M.C. Lee sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 136 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

Charles M.C. Lee D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles M.C. Lee sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Overview

Charles M.C. Lee is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Business, Management and Accounting as well as Economics, Econometrics and Finance.

The scientist's scholarly work covers several subfields including:

  • Accounting
  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Management Information Systems
  • Management Science and Operations Research

Key research topics addressed in their publications include:

  • Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Corporate Finance and Governance
  • Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
  • Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
  • Private Equity and Venture Capital
  • Accounting Education and Careers
  • Accounting and Organizational Management

Their body of work has appeared most frequently in:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • The Accounting Review
  • Review of Financial Studies
  • Journal of Financial Economics
  • Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship

Selected recent papers include:

  • Production complementarity and information transmission across industries, 2024, Journal of Financial Economics
  • Active Funds and Bundled News, 2021, The Accounting Review
  • Evaluating Firm-Level Expected-Return Proxies: Implications for Estimating Treatment Effects, 2020, Review of Financial Studies
  • Tick Size Tolls: Can a Trading Slowdown Improve Earnings News Discovery?, 2020, The Accounting Review
  • Shall We Talk? The Role of Interactive Investor Platforms in Corporate Communication, 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal

Frequent collaborators found in their research include:

  • Yuanyu Qu
  • Qinlin Zhong
  • Lin William Cong
  • Tao Shen
  • Shana Clor-Proell

Best Publications

  • Inferring Trade Direction from Intraday Data

    Charles M. C. Lee;Mark J. Ready

  • Investor Sentiment and the Closed-End Fund Puzzle

    Charles Lee;Andrei Shleifer;Richard H. Thaler

  • Investor Sentiment and the Closed-End Fund Puzzle

    Charles M. C. Lee;Andrei Shleifer;Richard H. Thaler

  • Toward an Implied Cost of Capital

    William R. Gebhardt;Charles M. C. Lee;Bhaskaran Swaminathan

  • Price Momentum and Trading Volume

    Charles M. C. Lee;Bhaskaran Swaminathan

  • Retail Investor Sentiment and Return Comovements

    Alok Kumar;Charles M.C. Lee

  • Accounting valuation, market expectation, and cross-sectional stock returns

    Richard Frankel;Charles M.C. Lee

  • Tunneling through intercorporate loans: The China experience☆

    Guohua Jiang;Charles M.C. Lee;Heng Yue

  • Spreads, Depths, and the Impact of Earnings Information: An Intraday Analysis

    Charles M. C. Lee;Belinda Mucklow;Mark J. Ready

  • Analyzing the Analysts: When Do Recommendations Add Value?

    Narasimhan Jegadeesh;Joonghyuk Kim;Susan D. Krische;Charles M. C. Lee

  • Analyst Forecast Revisions and Market Price Discovery

    Cristi A. Gleason;Charles M. C. Lee

  • Inferring Trade Direction from Intraday Data

    Unknown

  • What is the Intrinsic Value of the Dow

    Charles M. C. Lee;James Myers;Bhaskaran Swaminathan

  • What's My Line? A Comparison of Industry Classification Schemes for Capital Market Research

    Sanjeev Bhojraj;Charles M. C. Lee;Derek K. Oler

  • Earnings news and small traders : An intraday analysis

    Charles M.C Lee

  • Information Uncertainty and Expected Returns

    Guohua Jiang;Charles M. C. Lee;Yi Zhang

  • Inferring investor behavior: Evidence from TORQ data

    Charles M.C. Lee;Balkrishna Radhakrishna

  • Who Is My Peer? A Valuation‐Based Approach to the Selection of Comparable Firms

    Sanjeev Bhojraj;Charles M. C. Lee

  • Investor Sentiment and the Closed-End Fund Puzzle

    Charles Lee;Andrei Shleifer;Andrei Shleifer;Richard H. Thaler;Richard H. Thaler

  • Closed-end Country Funds and U.S. Market Sentiment

    James N . Bodurtha.;Dong Soon Kim;Charles M . C . Lee

  • Market Integration and Price Execution for NYSE-Listed Securities

    Charles M. C. Lee

  • Volume, Volatility, and New York Stock Exchange Trading Halts

    Charles M. C. Lee;Mark J. Ready;Paul J. Seguin

  • Information Uncertainty and Expected Returns

    Guohua Jiang;Charles M.C. Lee;Grace Yi Zhang

Frequent Co-Authors

Bhaskaran Swaminathan
Bhaskaran Swaminathan LSV Asset Management
Messod Daniel Beneish
Messod Daniel Beneish Indiana University
Chang Yong Lee
Chang Yong Lee Cornell University
Richard H. Thaler
Richard H. Thaler University of Chicago
Ki Won Lee
Ki Won Lee Seoul National University
Andrei Shleifer
Andrei Shleifer Harvard University
Richard M. Frankel
Richard M. Frankel Washington University in St. Louis
Narasimhan Jegadeesh
Narasimhan Jegadeesh Emory University
Zigang Dong
Zigang Dong University of Minnesota
Yves Desjardins
Yves Desjardins Université Laval

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Economics and Finance can open doors to a range of advanced online degrees and diverse career opportunities. Many students expand their expertise by pursuing specialized programs that complement fundamental business knowledge.

For those interested in the people strategy aspect of business, a human resources degree online can provide vital skills in talent management, employee relations, and organizational development.

The growing demand for data-driven decision making has also made a masters in data analytics online highly valuable. This degree prepares graduates for careers in market research, financial analysis, and data science roles.

Professionals seeking to build their capacity for leadership may find the best online master's in organizational leadership an ideal next step. This program focuses on strategic planning, team building, and leading organizational change.

Lastly, if you’re interested in a more comprehensive approach to the business world, learn more about how to get a business degree online. Flexible online options make it easier to balance studies with work or personal commitments while upgrading your qualifications.

Best Scientists Citing Charles M.C. Lee

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles