World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
35
Citations
4031
World Ranking
2227
National Ranking
879

Economics and Finance

D-Index
35
Citations
4012
World Ranking
2976
National Ranking
1639

Philip M.J. Reckers publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip M.J. Reckers sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 115 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 107 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Philip M.J. Reckers D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip M.J. Reckers sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 67 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Overview

Philip M.J. Reckers is affiliated with Arizona State University in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines including Business, Management and Accounting, as well as Psychology, with significant contributions in related subfields such as Clinical Psychology, Accounting, Information Systems and Management, Safety Research, and Sociology and Political Science.

Their work has covered a range of main topics, particularly focusing on Personality Traits and Psychology; Ethics in Business and Education; Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance; Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies; Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment; Corruption and Economic Development; and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior.

Philip M.J. Reckers has published in various academic journals and venues. Frequent publication venues include Behavioral Research in Accounting, SSRN Electronic Journal, Advances in Accounting, Accounting Horizons, and Journal of Business Ethics.

Notable recent papers include:

  • The influence of auditor narcissism and moral disengagement on risk assessments of a narcissistic client CFO, 2021, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy
  • The Influence of Auditor Narcissism and Moral Disengagement on Risk Assessments of a Narcissistic Client CFO, 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal
  • The Influence of Professional Commitment and Rationalization-Discrediting Interventions on Unethical Audit Decisions, 2022, Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory
  • Drivers of juror's malpractice assessments in auditor litigation involving offshoring and overtime: Generation and a management Mindset, 2020, Advances in Accounting
  • The Effects of Exposing CPAs to Rationalizations: Conscious and Unconscious Outcomes, 2021, Accounting Horizons

Philip M.J. Reckers has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including Eric N. Johnson, D. Jordan Lowe, Valerie Chambers, Alan Reinstein, and Steven E. Kaszak.

Best Publications

  • THE INFLUENCE OF ETHICAL ATTITUDES ON TAXPAYER COMPLIANCE

    Philip M. J. Reckers;Debra L. Sanders;Stephen J. Roark

  • Perceived effects of gender, family structure, and physical appearance on career progression in public accounting: A research note

    John C. Anderson;Eric N. Johnson;Philip M.J. Reckers

  • An Examination of the Influence of CPA Firm Type, Size, and MAS Provision on Loan Officer Decisions and Perceptions

    Sue McKinley;Kurt Pany;Philip M. J. Reckers

  • Alternative work arrangements and perceived career success: Current evidence from the big four firms in the US

    Eric N. Johnson;D. Jordan Lowe;Philip M.J. Reckers

  • The Mitigation of Hindsight Bias in Judges' Evaluation of Auditor Decisions

    John C. Anderson;Marianne M. Jennings;David Lowe;Philip Reckers

  • The Effects of Decision‐Aid Use and Reliability on Jurors' Evaluations of Auditor Liability

    D. Jordan Lowe;Philip M. J. Reckers;Stacey M. Whitecotton

  • The Effects of Hindsight Bias on Jurors' Evaluations of Auditor Decisions*

    D. Jordan Lowe;Philip M.J. Reckers

  • The Impact of Group Processing on Selected Audit Disclosure Decisions

    Joseph J. Schultz;Philip M. J. Reckers

  • Evaluation of auditor decisions: hindsight bias effects and the expectation gap

    John C. Anderson;D.Jordan Lowe;Philip M.J. Reckers

  • A STUDY OF TAX EVASION JUDGMENTS

    Steven E. Kaplan;Philip M. J. Reckers

  • An Empirical Investigation of the Interface Between Internal and External Auditors

    Richard G. Brody;Steven P. Golen;Philip M. J. Reckers

  • Auditor independence and nonaudit services: Director views and their policy implications

    Kurt Pany;P.M.J. Reckers

  • Exploring the role of learning style research in accounting education policy

    Bruce A. Baldwin;Philip M.J. Reckers

  • The Significance of Audit Decision Aids and Precase Jurists' Attitudes on Perceptions of Audit Firm Culpability and Liability*

    Marianne Jennings;Dan C. Kneer;Philip M. J. Reckers

  • Integrating Technology and Business Process Analysis into Introductory Accounting Courses

    Julie Smith David;Harriet Maccracken;Philip M. J. Reckers

  • An examination of tax reporting recommendations of professional tax preparers

    Steven E. Kaplan;Philip M.J. Reckers;Stephen G. West;James C. Boyd

  • An examination of tax practitioner decisions: The role of preparer sanctions and framing effects associated with client condition

    Kaye J. Newberry;Philip M.J. Reckers;Robert W. Wyndelts

  • Restoring public confidence in capital markets through auditor rotation

    Sandra K. Gates;D. Jordan Lowe;Philip M.J. Reckers

  • An examination of information search during initial audit planning

    Steven E. Kaplan;Philip M.J. Reckers

  • INCREASING TAX COMPLIANCE IN WASHINGTON STATE: A FIELD EXPERIMENT

    Govind S. Iyer;Philip M. J. Reckers;Debra L. Sanders

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven E. Kaplan
Steven E. Kaplan Arizona State University
Stephen G. West
Stephen G. West Arizona State University
Kim D. Reynolds
Kim D. Reynolds Claremont Graduate University
Arnold M. Wright
Arnold M. Wright Northeastern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring business and management studies in the USA also opens doors to related fields that are rapidly growing. For instance, pursuing a health administration degree online is an excellent pathway for those interested in combining business skills with the expanding healthcare sector. Many institutions also offer cheap mha programs (Master of Healthcare Administration), making graduate education more accessible to students seeking leadership roles in healthcare organizations.

Business-minded students often consider an accounting degree as well. Understanding the accounting degree cost can help you find affordable options while preparing for careers in finance, auditing, or corporate management. Additionally, as artificial intelligence continues to transform industries, many are looking at the best online ai degrees to stay competitive in the job market.

By exploring these related online degrees, you can tailor your education to meet your career goals and remain flexible in an ever-evolving professional landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Philip M.J. Reckers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles