World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

James E. Hunton publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James E. Hunton between 1996 and 2016, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James E. Hunton published across 21 years, from 1996 to 2016, averaging 7.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2015. 21 of the 149 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2016. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2015. 1996: 2 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 4 publications
1996 2016

149 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James E. Hunton: publications per year, 1996 to 2016
Year Publications
1996 2
1997 7
1998 6
1999 6
2000 11
2001 9
2002 11
2003 7
2004 11
2005 13
2006 7
2007 4
2008 7
2009 5
2010 9
2011 8
2012 3
2013 2
2014 0
2015 17
2016 4
Total 149
Download as CSV

James E. Hunton publications per year - data summary

  • James E. Hunton, a Business and Management scholar from Bentley University, has 149 publications recorded across 21 years, from 1996 to 2016.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1996 and the most recent to 2016.
  • The most productive year is 2015, with 17 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1996 and 2013, with 2 publications each.
  • 1 of the 21 years in the span carries no publications at all (2014).
  • The rate of publication averages 7.1 papers per year over the whole span, or 7.5 per year counting only the 20 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2012-2016) hold 26 publications, 17% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1996-2002: 52 publications (7.4 per year); 2003-2009: 54 publications (7.7 per year); 2010-2016: 43 publications (6.1 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is broadly steady.

James E. Hunton publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James E. Hunton sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

James E. Hunton publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,017 Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 82 ranges running from 35–39 to 436+ publications.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 135–139 publications range.
  • The most crowded range is 95–99 publications, holding 122 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 52% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 135–139 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 436 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

James E. Hunton D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James E. Hunton sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

James E. Hunton D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,017 Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 60 ranges running from 30 to 89+ D-Index.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 42 D-Index range.
  • The most crowded range is 32 D-Index, holding 171 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 44 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more, 96 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Overview

James E. Hunton is affiliated with Bentley University in the United States. Their academic profile reflects engagement in research and teaching at this institution.

The available data does not list any recent papers authored by James E. Hunton, nor does it specify frequent co-authors or common publication venues. Similarly, there is no information regarding book publications or awards received.

Interdisciplinary aspects such as main fields of study, subfields, and main topics of work have not been detailed in the available data.

Given these points, James E. Hunton's profile is currently characterized by an association with Bentley University without additional publicly indexed research outputs or collaborations documented in this source.

Best Publications

  • Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: Comparing Firm Performance of Adopters and Nonadopters

    James E Hunton;Barbara Lippincott;Jacqueline L Reck

  • Market Reaction to ERP Implementation Announcements

    David C. Hayes;James E. Hunton;Jacqueline L. Reck

  • A balanced scorecard based framework for assessing the strategic impacts of ERP systems

    Donald Chand;George Hachey;James Hunton;Vincent Owhoso

  • Financial Reporting Transparency and Earnings Management

    James E. Hunton;Robert Libby;Cheri L. Mazza

  • The Use of Technology in the Delivery of Instruction: Implications for Accounting Educators and Education Researchers

    Stephanie M. Bryant;James E. Hunton

  • Effects of User Participation in Systems Development: A Longitudinal Field Experiment

    Unknown

  • Recognition v. Disclosure, Auditor Tolerance for Misstatement, and the Reliability of Stock-Compensation and Lease Information

    Robert Libby;Mark W. Nelson;James E. Hunton

  • Information Systems Outsourcing Announcements: Investigating the Impact on the Market Value of Contract‐Granting Firms

    David C. Hayes;James E. Hunton;Jacqueline L. Reck

  • RETRACTED: Enterprise resource planning systems and non-financial performance incentives: The joint impact on corporate performance

    Benson Wier;James Hunton;Hassan R. HassabElnaby

  • The impact of client and auditor gender on auditors' judgments (retracted)

    Anna Gold;James E. Hunton;Mohamed I. Gomaa

  • Blending Information and Communication Technology with Accounting Research

    James E. Hunton

  • Retracted: Analysts’ Reactions to Earnings Preannouncement Strategies

    Hun-Tong Tan;Robert Libby;James E. Hunton

  • Retracted: Relationship Incentives and the Optimistic/Pessimistic Pattern in Analysts' Forecasts

    Robert Libby;James E. Hunton;Hun-Tong Tan;Nicholas Seybert

  • The Reaction of Financial Analysts to Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Implementation Plans (Retracted)

    James E. Hunton;Ruth Ann McEwen;Benson Wier

  • Are Financial Auditors Overconfident in Their Ability to Assess Risks Associated with Enterprise Resource Planning Systems? (Retracted)

    James E. Hunton;Arnold M. Wright;Sally Wright

  • The value of voice in participative decision making.

    James E. Hunton;Thomas W. Hall;Kenneth H. Price

  • Effects of the user participation process and task meaningfulness on key information system outcomes

    James E. Hunton;Kenneth H. Price

  • Does the Form of Management's Earnings Guidance Affect Analysts' Earnings Forecasts? (Retracted)

    Robert Libby;Hun‐Tong Tan;James E. Hunton

  • Retraction: The Impact of Alternative Telework Arrangements on Organizational Commitment: Insights from a Longitudinal Field Experiment

    James E. Hunton;Carolyn Strand Norman

  • Potential Functional and Dysfunctional Effects of Continuous Monitoring (Retracted)

    James E. Hunton;Elaine G. Mauldin;Patrick R. Wheeler

  • Are Financial Auditors Overconfident in Their Ability to Assess Risks Associated With Enterprise Resource Planning Systems

    James E. Hunton;James E. Hunton;Arnold Wright;Sally Wright

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert Libby
Robert Libby Cornell University
Hun-Tong Tan
Hun-Tong Tan Nanyang Technological University
Arnold M. Wright
Arnold M. Wright Northeastern University
Mark W. Nelson
Mark W. Nelson Cornell University
Steve G. Sutton
Steve G. Sutton University of Central Florida
Kees van den Bos
Kees van den Bos Utrecht University
Martin Carree
Martin Carree Maastricht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Business and Management studies in the USA open up diverse online degree options, allowing students to specialize in emerging and in-demand fields. One popular choice is a health administration degree, which equips graduates to manage healthcare organizations and navigate the complexities of healthcare systems.

For those looking to advance their careers, pursuing a mha degree (Master of Healthcare Administration) can offer leadership opportunities and higher earning potential in hospitals, clinics, and health-focused businesses.

Alternatively, many students explore financial disciplines through the cheapest online accounting degree programs. Accounting is a core pathway for anyone interested in roles such as auditors, financial analysts, or accountants in both private and public sectors.

Technology-driven business roles are also on the rise. Earning an ai degree can prepare students for careers in data analysis, machine learning, and business innovation within tech-savvy industries.

These flexible online degrees help students align education with their career interests in a cost-effective and accessible way.

Best Scientists Citing James E. Hunton

Recently Published Articles