World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 54 2128 1934 1025 919 217 13711

Miklos A. Vasarhelyi publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Miklos A. Vasarhelyi between 1971 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Miklos A. Vasarhelyi published across 55 years, from 1971 to 2025, averaging 5.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2024. 50 of the 283 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1971 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2024. 1971: 1 publication 1972: 2 publications 1973: 4 publications 1974: 2 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 2 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 11 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 25 publications 2025: 25 publications
1971 2025

283 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Miklos A. Vasarhelyi: publications per year, 1971 to 2025
Year Publications
1971 1
1972 2
1973 4
1974 2
1975 1
1976 2
1977 1
1978 1
1979 0
1980 1
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 2
1985 1
1986 2
1987 4
1988 3
1989 1
1990 0
1991 0
1992 1
1993 0
1994 1
1995 1
1996 0
1997 2
1998 4
1999 3
2000 2
2001 2
2002 2
2003 5
2004 5
2005 8
2006 3
2007 2
2008 6
2009 1
2010 11
2011 10
2012 6
2013 9
2014 12
2015 5
2016 4
2017 9
2018 16
2019 13
2020 11
2021 16
2022 18
2023 16
2024 25
2025 25
Total 283
Download as CSV

Miklos A. Vasarhelyi publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miklos A. Vasarhelyi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 214–223 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 217 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246 217
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Miklos A. Vasarhelyi D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miklos A. Vasarhelyi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131 54
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Miklos A. Vasarhelyi is affiliated with Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Business, Management and Accounting as well as Computer Science, with a significant focus on subfields such as Accounting, Management Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, and Management Science and Operations Research.

The research topics addressed by Vasarhelyi include areas such as Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance, Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques, Big Data and Business Intelligence, Business Process Modeling and Analysis, Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction, Stock Market Forecasting Methods, and Software Engineering Research.

Vasarhelyi has contributed to numerous academic papers published in various venues. Some notable recent publications include:

  • The Ethical Implications of Using Artificial Intelligence in Auditing, 2020, Journal of Business Ethics
  • Machine learning improves accounting estimates: evidence from insurance payments, 2020, Review of Accounting Studies
  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in auditing, 2022, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems
  • Learning from Machine Learning in Accounting and Assurance, 2020, Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting
  • Chain of Values: Examining the Economic Impacts of Blockchain on the Value-Added Tax System, 2021, Journal of Management Information Systems

Frequent collaboration is a notable aspect of Vasarhelyi's work. Their frequent coauthors include Huijue Kelly Duan, Chanyuan Zhang, Jun Dai, Huaxia Li, and Hanxin Hu.

Vasarhelyi's publications are often found in specialized venues including:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting
  • International Journal of Accounting Information Systems
  • Journal of Information Systems
  • The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research

Best Publications

  • Toward Blockchain-Based Accounting and Assurance

    Jun Dai;Jun Dai;Miklos A. Vasarhelyi

  • Big Data in Accounting: An Overview

    Miklos A. Vasarhelyi;Alexander Kogan;Brad M. Tuttle

  • Impact of business analytics and enterprise systems on managerial accounting

    Deniz Appelbaum;Alexander Kogan;Miklos A. Vasarhelyi;Zhaokai Yan

  • Big Data and Analytics in the Modern Audit Engagement: Research Needs

    Deniz Appelbaum;Alexander Kogan;Miklos A. Vasarhelyi

  • The Ethical Implications of Using Artificial Intelligence in Auditing

    Ivy Munoko;Helen L. Brown-Liburd;Miklos Vasarhelyi

  • The Continuous Audit of Online Systems1

    Miklos A. Vasarhelyi;Fern B. Halper

  • Robotic process automation for auditing

    Kevin C. Moffitt;Andrea M. Rozario;Miklos A. Vasarhelyi

  • Research Ideas for Artificial Intelligence in Auditing: The Formalization of Audit and Workforce Supplementation

    Hussein Issa;Ting Sun;Miklos A. Vasarhelyi

  • Continuous monitoring of business process controls: A pilot implementation of a continuous auditing system at Siemens

    Michael G. Alles;Gerard Brennan;Alexander Kogan;Miklos A. Vasarhelyi

  • Principles of Analytic Monitoring for Continuous Assurance

    Miklos A. Vasarhelyi;Michael G. Alles;Alexander Kogan

  • Applying robotic process automation (RPA) in auditing: A framework

    Feiqi Huang;Miklos A. Vasarhelyi

  • Putting Continuous Auditing Theory into Practice: Lessons from Two Pilot Implementations

    Michael G. Alles;Alexander Kogan;Miklos A. Vasarhelyi

  • Continuous Online Auditing: A Program of Research

    Alexander Kogan;Ephraim F. Sudit;Miklos A. Vasarhelyi

  • Innovation and practice of continuous auditing

    David Y. Chan;Miklos A. Vasarhelyi

  • Feasibility and Economics of Continuous Assurance

    Michael G. Alles;Alexander Kogan;Miklos A. Vasarhelyi

  • A Field Study on the Use of Process Mining of Event Logs as an Analytical Procedure in Auditing

    Mieke Jans;Michael G. Alles;Miklos A. Vasarhelyi

  • Financial Reporting in XBRL on the SEC's EDGAR System: A Critique and Evaluation

    Roger S. Debreceny;Akhilesh Chandra;John J. Cheh;Denise Guithues-Amrhein

  • AIS in an Age of Big Data

    Kevin C. Moffitt;Miklos A. Vasarhelyi

  • The case for process mining in auditing: Sources of value added and areas of application

    Mieke Jans;Michael G. Alles;Miklos A. Vasarhelyi

  • Imagineering Audit 4.0

    Jun Dai;Miklos A. Vasarhelyi

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Alles
Michael Alles Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Alexander Kogan
Alexander Kogan Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Theodore J. Mock
Theodore J. Mock University of California, Riverside
Lawrence D. Brown
Lawrence D. Brown Temple University
Baruch Lev
Baruch Lev New York University
Michael Ettredge
Michael Ettredge University of Kansas
Rani Hoitash
Rani Hoitash Bentley University
Murray Turoff
Murray Turoff New Jersey Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to numerous specialized online degrees and promising career paths. Many students explore affordable online master’s programs to gain expertise while managing costs. For example, those interested in social work might want to consider the cheapest msw programs online, which can make obtaining a Master of Social Work more accessible.

If your focus is on behavioral analysis, accredited bcba online masters programs prepare graduates to become Board Certified Behavior Analysts—an in-demand credential in both education and healthcare environments.

For those who want to accelerate their studies, options like the fastest msw program can help you complete your degree in less time without compromising the curriculum’s depth.

Similarly, a fast track psychology degree online allows you to quickly enter fields such as counseling, human resources, or research.

With flexible online formats and various specialization options, these programs cater to diverse interests and career ambitions within the social sciences and humanities landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Miklos A. Vasarhelyi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles