World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 88 13011 12247 6650 6151 612 34185

Daniel F. Hanley publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daniel F. Hanley between 1964 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daniel F. Hanley published across 63 years, from 1964 to 2026, averaging 11.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 57 publications in 2023. 37 of the 749 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1964 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 57. Peak 57 publications in 2023. 1964: 1 publication 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 1 publication 1969: 0 publications 1970: 2 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 3 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 2 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 9 publications 1989: 15 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 10 publications 1992: 9 publications 1993: 10 publications 1994: 27 publications 1995: 15 publications 1996: 12 publications 1997: 20 publications 1998: 19 publications 1999: 20 publications 2000: 15 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 18 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 26 publications 2015: 30 publications 2016: 31 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 31 publications 2020: 28 publications 2021: 28 publications 2022: 28 publications 2023: 57 publications 2024: 38 publications 2025: 34 publications 2026: 3 publications
1964 2026

749 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daniel F. Hanley: publications per year, 1964 to 2026
Year Publications
1964 1
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 1
1969 0
1970 2
1971 0
1972 1
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 1
1977 1
1978 0
1979 3
1980 1
1981 2
1982 0
1983 4
1984 3
1985 4
1986 3
1987 5
1988 9
1989 15
1990 7
1991 10
1992 9
1993 10
1994 27
1995 15
1996 12
1997 20
1998 19
1999 20
2000 15
2001 11
2002 12
2003 10
2004 10
2005 14
2006 7
2007 11
2008 18
2009 10
2010 9
2011 7
2012 16
2013 17
2014 26
2015 30
2016 31
2017 22
2018 21
2019 31
2020 28
2021 28
2022 28
2023 57
2024 38
2025 34
2026 3
Total 749
Download as CSV

Daniel F. Hanley publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel F. Hanley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 601–620 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 612 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396 612
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Daniel F. Hanley D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel F. Hanley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970 88
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Daniel F. Hanley is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States, with a research focus primarily within the field of Medicine. Their work covers several key subfields, including Neurology, Epidemiology, Infectious Diseases, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Surgery.

The researcher's main topics of study include:

  • Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19

Daniel F. Hanley has contributed extensively to scientific literature, with notable publications including:

  • Early Outpatient Treatment for Covid-19 with Convalescent Plasma, 2022, published in New England Journal of Medicine
  • The Curing Coma Campaign: Framing Initial Scientific Challenges-Proceedings of the First Curing Coma Campaign Scientific Advisory Council Meeting, 2020, Neurocritical Care
  • Hemorrhagic stroke, 2020, Handbook of clinical neurology
  • One-Year Outcome Trajectories and Factors Associated with Functional Recovery Among Survivors of Intracerebral and Intraventricular Hemorrhage With Initial Severe Disability, 2022, JAMA Neurology
  • Advances in Therapeutic Approaches for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage, 2020, Neurotherapeutics

Their frequent co-authors reflect an active collaboration network and include:

  • Wendy Ziai
  • Issam A. Awad
  • Karen Lane
  • Nichol McBee
  • Radhika Avadhani

Regarding publication venues, the researcher frequently publishes in:

  • Stroke
  • Neurocritical Care
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
  • Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases

Daniel F. Hanley's research contributions span a broad look at neurological disorders, stroke management, and clinical approaches to hemorrhagic conditions. In recent years, their work has notably expanded into COVID-19-related clinical research, addressing both treatment methods and the longer-term impacts of the disease.

Best Publications

  • Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.

    Adnan I. Qureshi;Adnan I. Qureshi;Stanley Tuhrim;Joseph P. Broderick;Henry H Batjer

  • Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in adults: 2007 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, High Blood Pressure Research Council, and the Quality of Care and Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Group.

    Joseph Broderick;Sander Connolly;Edward Feldmann;Daniel Hanley

  • Intensive Blood-Pressure Lowering in Patients with Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage

    Adnan I. Qureshi;Yuko Y. Palesch;William G. Barsan;Daniel F. Hanley

  • A regional intervention to improve the hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group

    Gerald T. O'Connor;Stephen K. Plume;Elaine M. Olmstead;Jeremy R. Morton

  • Repetitive Bilateral Arm Training and Motor Cortex Activation in Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Andreas R. Luft;Sandy McCombe-Waller;Sandy McCombe-Waller;Jill Whitall;Jill Whitall;Larry W. Forrester;Larry W. Forrester

  • Induction of nitric oxide synthase in demyelinating regions of multiple sclerosis brains.

    Lars Bö;Ted M. Dawson;Steven Wesselingh;Sverre Mörk

  • Treadmill Exercise Rehabilitation Improves Ambulatory Function and Cardiovascular Fitness in Patients With Chronic Stroke A Randomized, Controlled Trial

    Richard F. Macko;Frederick M. Ivey;Larry W. Forrester;Daniel Hanley

  • Symptom Status and Quality of Life Following Prostatectomy

    F.J. Fowler;J.E. Wennberg;R.P. Timothy;M.J. Barry

  • HINTS outperforms ABCD2 to screen for stroke in acute continuous vertigo and dizziness

    David E. Newman-Toker;Kevin A. Kerber;Yu Hsiang Hsieh;John H. Pula

  • Thrombolytic removal of intraventricular haemorrhage in treatment of severe stroke: results of the randomised, multicentre, multiregion, placebo-controlled CLEAR III trial.

    Daniel F Hanley;Karen Lane;Nichol McBee;Wendy Ziai

  • Minimally Invasive Surgery Plus Recombinant Tissue-type Plasminogen Activator for Intracerebral Hemorrhage Evacuation Decreases Perihematomal Edema

    W. Andrew Mould;J. Ricardo Carhuapoma;John Muschelli;Karen Lane

  • Absolute risk and predictors of the growth of acute spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data

    Rustam Al-Shahi Salman;Joseph Frantzias;Robert J Lee;Patrick D Lyden

  • Treadmill Exercise Activates Subcortical Neural Networks and Improves Walking After Stroke : A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Andreas R. Luft;Richard F. Macko;Richard F. Macko;Larry W. Forrester;Larry W. Forrester;Federico Villagra

  • Safety and efficacy of minimally invasive surgery plus alteplase in intracerebral haemorrhage evacuation (MISTIE): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 2 trial

    Daniel F. Hanley;Richard E. Thompson;John Muschelli;Michael Rosenblum

  • Preliminary findings of the minimally-invasive surgery plus rtPA for intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation (MISTIE) clinical trial.

    T. Morgan;M. Zuccarello;R. Narayan;P. Keyl

  • Intraventricular thrombolysis speeds blood clot resolution: Results of a pilot, prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial

    Neal J. Naff;Daniel F. Hanley;Penelope M. Keyl;Stanley Tuhrim

  • Prevalence and knowledge of transient ischemic attack among US adults

    S. C. Johnston;P. B. Fayad;P. B. Gorelick;D. F. Hanley

  • Diseases that mimic herpes simplex encephalitis. Diagnosis, presentation, and outcome. NIAD Collaborative Antiviral Study Group.

    R. J. Whitley;C. G. Cobbs;C. A. Alford;Seng-Jaw Soong

  • Treatment of Intraventricular Hemorrhage With Urokinase Effects on 30-Day Survival

    Neal J. Naff;Juan R. Carhuapoma;Michael A. Williams;Anish Bhardwaj

  • Intraventricular Hemorrhage: Severity Factor and Treatment Target in Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage

    Daniel F. Hanley

Frequent Co-Authors

Issam A. Awad
Issam A. Awad University of Chicago
Nitish V. Thakor
Nitish V. Thakor National University of Singapore
Richard J. Traystman
Richard J. Traystman Johns Hopkins University
Andreas Luft
Andreas Luft University of Zurich
Paul M. Vespa
Paul M. Vespa University of California, Los Angeles
Hooman Kamel
Hooman Kamel Cornell University
Richard F. Macko
Richard F. Macko University of Maryland, Baltimore
Michael Rosenblum
Michael Rosenblum University of California, San Francisco
Carlos S. Kase
Carlos S. Kase Boston University
Kennedy R. Lees
Kennedy R. Lees University of Glasgow

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in medical careers but unsure whether a traditional medical degree is right for you, there are several related online degrees and career pathways in healthcare to consider. One growing field is medical billing and coding financial aid programs, which offer flexible learning and support to help you enter the vital administrative side of healthcare.

Nursing is another rewarding option, and many students seek nursing school that don't require teas entrance exams, streamlining the admissions process for those looking to fast-track their studies. For those aiming for leadership roles, choosing an accelerated healthcare administration degree can open doors quickly to vital managerial positions across the industry.

Registered Nurses looking to advance further should consider adn to msn bridge programs, which provide a direct pathway to higher responsibility and income. Each of these online degrees offers flexibility, faster timelines, and financial aid opportunities, allowing you to tailor your healthcare career journey to your needs.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel F. Hanley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles