World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
88
Citations
34185
World Ranking
13012
National Ranking
6651

Daniel F. Hanley publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel F. Hanley sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 612 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Daniel F. Hanley D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel F. Hanley sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel F. Hanley is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States, with a research focus primarily within the field of Medicine. Their work covers several key subfields, including Neurology, Epidemiology, Infectious Diseases, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Surgery.

The researcher's main topics of study include:

  • Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19

Daniel F. Hanley has contributed extensively to scientific literature, with notable publications including:

  • Early Outpatient Treatment for Covid-19 with Convalescent Plasma, 2022, published in New England Journal of Medicine
  • The Curing Coma Campaign: Framing Initial Scientific Challenges-Proceedings of the First Curing Coma Campaign Scientific Advisory Council Meeting, 2020, Neurocritical Care
  • Hemorrhagic stroke, 2020, Handbook of clinical neurology
  • One-Year Outcome Trajectories and Factors Associated with Functional Recovery Among Survivors of Intracerebral and Intraventricular Hemorrhage With Initial Severe Disability, 2022, JAMA Neurology
  • Advances in Therapeutic Approaches for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage, 2020, Neurotherapeutics

Their frequent co-authors reflect an active collaboration network and include:

  • Wendy Ziai
  • Issam A. Awad
  • Karen Lane
  • Nichol McBee
  • Radhika Avadhani

Regarding publication venues, the researcher frequently publishes in:

  • Stroke
  • Neurocritical Care
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
  • Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases

Daniel F. Hanley's research contributions span a broad look at neurological disorders, stroke management, and clinical approaches to hemorrhagic conditions. In recent years, their work has notably expanded into COVID-19-related clinical research, addressing both treatment methods and the longer-term impacts of the disease.

Best Publications

  • Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.

    Adnan I. Qureshi;Adnan I. Qureshi;Stanley Tuhrim;Joseph P. Broderick;Henry H Batjer

  • Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in adults: 2007 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, High Blood Pressure Research Council, and the Quality of Care and Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Group.

    Joseph Broderick;Sander Connolly;Edward Feldmann;Daniel Hanley

  • Intensive Blood-Pressure Lowering in Patients with Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage

    Adnan I. Qureshi;Yuko Y. Palesch;William G. Barsan;Daniel F. Hanley

  • A regional intervention to improve the hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group

    Gerald T. O'Connor;Stephen K. Plume;Elaine M. Olmstead;Jeremy R. Morton

  • Repetitive Bilateral Arm Training and Motor Cortex Activation in Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Andreas R. Luft;Sandy McCombe-Waller;Sandy McCombe-Waller;Jill Whitall;Jill Whitall;Larry W. Forrester;Larry W. Forrester

  • Induction of nitric oxide synthase in demyelinating regions of multiple sclerosis brains.

    Lars Bö;Ted M. Dawson;Steven Wesselingh;Sverre Mörk

  • Treadmill Exercise Rehabilitation Improves Ambulatory Function and Cardiovascular Fitness in Patients With Chronic Stroke A Randomized, Controlled Trial

    Richard F. Macko;Frederick M. Ivey;Larry W. Forrester;Daniel Hanley

  • Symptom Status and Quality of Life Following Prostatectomy

    F.J. Fowler;J.E. Wennberg;R.P. Timothy;M.J. Barry

  • HINTS outperforms ABCD2 to screen for stroke in acute continuous vertigo and dizziness

    David E. Newman-Toker;Kevin A. Kerber;Yu Hsiang Hsieh;John H. Pula

  • Thrombolytic removal of intraventricular haemorrhage in treatment of severe stroke: results of the randomised, multicentre, multiregion, placebo-controlled CLEAR III trial.

    Daniel F Hanley;Karen Lane;Nichol McBee;Wendy Ziai

  • Minimally Invasive Surgery Plus Recombinant Tissue-type Plasminogen Activator for Intracerebral Hemorrhage Evacuation Decreases Perihematomal Edema

    W. Andrew Mould;J. Ricardo Carhuapoma;John Muschelli;Karen Lane

  • Absolute risk and predictors of the growth of acute spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data

    Rustam Al-Shahi Salman;Joseph Frantzias;Robert J Lee;Patrick D Lyden

  • Treadmill Exercise Activates Subcortical Neural Networks and Improves Walking After Stroke : A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Andreas R. Luft;Richard F. Macko;Richard F. Macko;Larry W. Forrester;Larry W. Forrester;Federico Villagra

  • Safety and efficacy of minimally invasive surgery plus alteplase in intracerebral haemorrhage evacuation (MISTIE): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 2 trial

    Daniel F. Hanley;Richard E. Thompson;John Muschelli;Michael Rosenblum

  • Preliminary findings of the minimally-invasive surgery plus rtPA for intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation (MISTIE) clinical trial.

    T. Morgan;M. Zuccarello;R. Narayan;P. Keyl

  • Intraventricular thrombolysis speeds blood clot resolution: Results of a pilot, prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial

    Neal J. Naff;Daniel F. Hanley;Penelope M. Keyl;Stanley Tuhrim

  • Prevalence and knowledge of transient ischemic attack among US adults

    S. C. Johnston;P. B. Fayad;P. B. Gorelick;D. F. Hanley

  • Diseases that mimic herpes simplex encephalitis. Diagnosis, presentation, and outcome. NIAD Collaborative Antiviral Study Group.

    R. J. Whitley;C. G. Cobbs;C. A. Alford;Seng-Jaw Soong

  • Treatment of Intraventricular Hemorrhage With Urokinase Effects on 30-Day Survival

    Neal J. Naff;Juan R. Carhuapoma;Michael A. Williams;Anish Bhardwaj

  • Intraventricular Hemorrhage: Severity Factor and Treatment Target in Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage

    Daniel F. Hanley

Frequent Co-Authors

Issam A. Awad
Issam A. Awad University of Chicago
Nitish V. Thakor
Nitish V. Thakor National University of Singapore
Richard J. Traystman
Richard J. Traystman Johns Hopkins University
Andreas Luft
Andreas Luft University of Zurich
Paul M. Vespa
Paul M. Vespa University of California, Los Angeles
Hooman Kamel
Hooman Kamel Cornell University
Richard F. Macko
Richard F. Macko University of Maryland, Baltimore
Michael Rosenblum
Michael Rosenblum University of California, San Francisco
Carlos S. Kase
Carlos S. Kase Boston University
Kennedy R. Lees
Kennedy R. Lees University of Glasgow

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in medical careers but unsure whether a traditional medical degree is right for you, there are several related online degrees and career pathways in healthcare to consider. One growing field is medical billing and coding financial aid programs, which offer flexible learning and support to help you enter the vital administrative side of healthcare.

Nursing is another rewarding option, and many students seek nursing school that don't require teas entrance exams, streamlining the admissions process for those looking to fast-track their studies. For those aiming for leadership roles, choosing an accelerated healthcare administration degree can open doors quickly to vital managerial positions across the industry.

Registered Nurses looking to advance further should consider adn to msn bridge programs, which provide a direct pathway to higher responsibility and income. Each of these online degrees offers flexibility, faster timelines, and financial aid opportunities, allowing you to tailor your healthcare career journey to your needs.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel F. Hanley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles