World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 54 4856 4464 2187 1976 140 14672

Daphna Shohamy publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daphna Shohamy between 2000 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daphna Shohamy published across 27 years, from 2000 to 2026, averaging 6.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2024. 9 of the 171 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2024. 2000: 4 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 8 publications 2026: 1 publication
2000 2026

171 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daphna Shohamy: publications per year, 2000 to 2026
Year Publications
2000 4
2001 1
2002 1
2003 2
2004 4
2005 2
2006 2
2007 3
2008 4
2009 4
2010 3
2011 5
2012 4
2013 6
2014 7
2015 10
2016 14
2017 3
2018 12
2019 11
2020 15
2021 11
2022 7
2023 10
2024 17
2025 8
2026 1
Total 171
Download as CSV

Daphna Shohamy publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daphna Shohamy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 138–147 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 140 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456 140
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Daphna Shohamy D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daphna Shohamy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392 54
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Daphna Shohamy is affiliated with Columbia University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Psychology, with a strong focus on Cognitive Neuroscience as well as Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Their work engages with subfields including Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and General Decision Sciences.

The scientist's published work frequently appears in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Biological Psychiatry, Nature Communications, eLife, and Journal of Vision.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Shohamy include Akram Bakkour, Karin Foerde, Joanna Steinglass, Nathaniel D. Daw, and B. Timothy Walsh.

Research topics covered in Shohamy's work include:

  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Memory Processes and Influences
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Some of their recent papers are:

  • "Racial and ethnic imbalance in neuroscience reference lists and intersections with gender" (2020), published in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • "What Are Memories For? The Hippocampus Bridges Past Experience with Future Decisions" (2020), published in Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • "Curiosity as the impulse to know: common behavioral and neural mechanisms underlying curiosity and impulsivity" (2020), published in Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
  • "Restrictive eating across a spectrum from healthy to unhealthy: behavioral and neural mechanisms" (2020), published in Psychological Medicine
  • "Deficient Goal-Directed Control in a Population Characterized by Extreme Goal Pursuit" (2020), published in Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Best Publications

  • Interactive memory systems in the human brain.

    R. A. Poldrack;J. Clark;E. J. Paré-Blagoev;D. Shohamy

  • Ventromedial prefrontal-subcortical systems and the generation of affective meaning

    Mathieu Roy;Daphna Shohamy;Tor D. Wager

  • Dopamine and adaptive memory

    Daphna Shohamy;R. Alison Adcock

  • Integrating Memories in the Human Brain: Hippocampal–Midbrain Encoding of Overlapping Events

    Daphna Shohamy;Daphna Shohamy;Anthony D. Wagner

  • Preference by association: how memory mechanisms in the hippocampus bias decisions.

    G. Elliott Wimmer;Daphna Shohamy

  • Decision Making and Sequential Sampling from Memory.

    Michael N. Shadlen;Michael N. Shadlen;Daphna Shohamy

  • Cortico‐striatal contributions to feedback‐based learning: converging data from neuroimaging and neuropsychology

    Daphna Shohamy;C. E. Myers;S. Grossman;J. Sage

  • Model-based choices involve prospective neural activity

    Bradley B Doll;Katherine D Duncan;Dylan A Simon;Daphna Shohamy

  • Human midbrain sensitivity to cognitive feedback and uncertainty during classification learning.

    Adam R. Aron;Daphna Shohamy;Jill Clark;Catherine Myers

  • How do people solve the "weather prediction" task?: individual variability in strategies for probabilistic category learning.

    Mark A. Gluck;Daphna Shohamy;Catherine Myers

  • Curiosity and reward: Valence predicts choice and information prediction errors enhance learning.

    Caroline B. Marvin;Daphna Shohamy

  • An Upside to Reward Sensitivity: The Hippocampus Supports Enhanced Reinforcement Learning in Adolescence

    Juliet Y. Davidow;Juliet Y. Davidow;Karin Foerde;Adriana Galván;Daphna Shohamy

  • Representation of aversive prediction errors in the human periaqueductal gray

    Mathieu Roy;Daphna Shohamy;Nathaniel Daw;Marieke Jepma

  • Basal ganglia and dopamine contributions to probabilistic category learning

    D. Shohamy;C.E. Myers;J. Kalanithi;M.A. Gluck

  • Reminders of past choices bias decisions for reward in humans

    Aaron M. Bornstein;Mel W. Khaw;Daphna Shohamy;Nathaniel Douglass Daw

  • Dissociating Hippocampal versus Basal Ganglia Contributions to Learning and Transfer

    Catherine E. Myers;Daphna Shohamy;Mark A. Gluck;Steven Grossman

  • The role of the basal ganglia in learning and memory: Insight from Parkinson's disease

    Karin Foerde;Daphna Shohamy

  • Feedback Timing Modulates Brain Systems for Learning in Humans

    Karin Foerde;Daphna Shohamy

  • Role of the Basal Ganglia in Category Learning: How Do Patients With Parkinson's Disease Learn?

    D. Shohamy;C. E. Myers;S. Onlaor;M. A. Gluck

  • Neural mechanisms supporting maladaptive food choices in anorexia nervosa

    Karin Foerde;Joanna E Steinglass;Daphna Shohamy;B Timothy Walsh

  • Mind matters: placebo enhances reward learning in Parkinson's disease

    Liane Schmidt;Erin Kendall Braun;Tor D Wager;Daphna Shohamy

Frequent Co-Authors

Nathaniel D. Daw
Nathaniel D. Daw Princeton University
Mark A. Gluck
Mark A. Gluck Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Catherine E. Myers
Catherine E. Myers United States Department of Veterans Affairs
B. Timothy Walsh
B. Timothy Walsh Columbia University
Michael N. Shadlen
Michael N. Shadlen Columbia University
Tor D. Wager
Tor D. Wager Dartmouth College
Danielle S. Bassett
Danielle S. Bassett University of Pennsylvania
Edward E. Smith
Edward E. Smith Columbia University
Russell A. Poldrack
Russell A. Poldrack Stanford University
Ramona O. Hopkins
Ramona O. Hopkins Brigham Young University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience opens up diverse options, both in continued education and in dynamic career fields. Many students interested in neuroscience pursue further qualifications, such as professional psychology programs. With the rise of flexible learning, you can now enroll in online accredited psyd programs to advance your expertise and qualify for advanced clinical roles.

If your passion lies in counseling and therapy, consider specialized credentials through programs like an online lmft program, which prepares graduates for marriage and family therapy positions.

For those aiming to fast-track their education, accelerated degree programs online make it possible to complete your undergraduate studies in less time. This allows you to enter the workforce or pursue graduate studies sooner.

Finally, when deciding on your educational path, it’s helpful to research the best degree in the world for earning power and job prospects. Neuroscience combines scientific rigor with career flexibility, making it a strong contender in today’s job market.

Best Scientists Citing Daphna Shohamy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles