World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
75
Citations
27921
World Ranking
19002
National Ranking
999

Peter Wust publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Wust sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 395 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Peter Wust D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Wust sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Wust is affiliated with Charité - University Medicine Berlin in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine and Engineering, with significant contributions to the subfields of Biomedical Engineering, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Hepatology, Biotechnology, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics including:

  • Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
  • Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
  • Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
  • Microbial Inactivation Methods
  • Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
  • Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

Peter Wust has contributed to several recent papers, with notable publications including:

  • Heating technology for malignant tumors: a review (2020) published in International Journal of Hyperthermia
  • Dose-intensified Versus Conventional-dose Salvage Radiotherapy for Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Prostatectomy: The SAKK 09/10 Randomized Phase 3 Trial (2021) published in European Urology
  • Non-thermal effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (2020) published in Scientific Reports
  • Non-thermal membrane effects of electromagnetic fields and therapeutic applications in oncology (2021) published in International Journal of Hyperthermia
  • Clinical Evidence for Thermometric Parameters to Guide Hyperthermia Treatment (2022) published in Cancers

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Pirus Ghadjar
  • Sebastian Zschaeck
  • Marcus Beck
  • Jacek Nadobny
  • Eva Oberacker

Peter Wust publishes regularly in journals such as International Journal of Hyperthermia, Cancers, F1000Research, European Urology, and Scientific Reports. The most frequent venues for publication include International Journal of Hyperthermia with eight publications and Cancers with four.

Best Publications

  • Hyperthermia in combined treatment of cancer

    P Wust;B Hildebrandt;G Sreenivasa;B Rau

  • The cellular and molecular basis of hyperthermia.

    Bert Hildebrandt;Peter Wust;Olaf Ahlers;Annette Dieing

  • Magnetic fluid hyperthermia (MFH): Cancer treatment with AC magnetic field induced excitation of biocompatible superparamagnetic nanoparticles

    Andreas Jordan;Regina Scholz;Peter Wust;Horst Fähling

  • Efficacy and safety of intratumoral thermotherapy using magnetic iron-oxide nanoparticles combined with external beam radiotherapy on patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme

    Klaus Maier-Hauff;Frank Ulrich;Dirk Nestler;Hendrik Niehoff

  • Presentation of a new magnetic field therapy system for the treatment of human solid tumors with magnetic fluid hyperthermia

    Andreas Jordan;Regina Scholz;Klaus Maier-Hauff;Manfred Johannsen

  • Clinical hyperthermia of prostate cancer using magnetic nanoparticles: Presentation of a new interstitial technique

    M. Johannsen;U. Gneveckow;L. Eckelt;A. Feussner

  • Intracranial thermotherapy using magnetic nanoparticles combined with external beam radiotherapy: results of a feasibility study on patients with glioblastoma multiforme.

    Klaus Maier-Hauff;Ronny Rothe;Regina Scholz;Uwe Gneveckow

  • Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy alone or with regional hyperthermia for localised high-risk soft-tissue sarcoma: a randomised phase 3 multicentre study

    Rolf D Issels;Lars H Lindner;Jaap Verweij;Peter Wust

  • Endocytosis of dextran and silan-coated magnetite nanoparticles and the effect of intracellular hyperthermia on human mammary carcinoma cells in vitro

    Andreas Jordan;Regina Scholz;Peter Wust;Hermann Schirra

  • Thermotherapy of Prostate Cancer Using Magnetic Nanoparticles: Feasibility, Imaging, and Three-Dimensional Temperature Distribution

    Manfred Johannsen;Uwe Gneveckow;Burghard Thiesen;Kasra Taymoorian

  • Magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia for prostate cancer

    Manfred Johannsen;Burghard Thiesen;Peter Wust;Andreas Jordan

  • Effects of Magnetic Fluid Hyperthermia (MFH) on C3H mammary carcinoma in vivo

    A. Jordan;R. Scholz;P. Wust;H. Fähling

  • Morbidity and quality of life during thermotherapy using magnetic nanoparticles in locally recurrent prostate cancer: Results of a prospective phase I trial

    M Johannsen;U Gneveckow;K Taymoorian;B Thiesen

  • Cellular uptake of magnetic fluid particles and their effects on human adenocarcinoma cells exposed to AC magnetic fields in vitro.

    A. Jordan;P. Wust;R. Scholz;B. Tesche

  • Hyperfractionated Accelerated Chemoradiation With Concurrent Fluorouracil-Mitomycin Is More Effective Than Dose-Escalated Hyperfractionated Accelerated Radiation Therapy Alone in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer: Final Results of the Radiotherapy Cooperative Clinical Trials Group of the German Cancer Society 95-06 Prospective Randomized Trial

    Volker Budach;Martin Stuschke;Wilfried Budach;Michael Baumann

  • Magnetic nanoparticles for interstitial thermotherapy--feasibility, tolerance and achieved temperatures.

    Peter Wust;Uwe Gneveckow;Manfred Johannsen;Dirk Böhmer

  • Description and characterization of the novel hyperthermia- and thermoablation-system MFH 300F for clinical magnetic fluid hyperthermia.

    Uwe Gneveckow;Andreas Jordan;Regina Scholz;Volker Brüß

  • Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Plus Regional Hyperthermia on Long-term Outcomes Among Patients With Localized High-Risk Soft Tissue Sarcoma: The EORTC 62961-ESHO 95 Randomized Clinical Trial

    Rolf D. Issels;Lars H. Lindner;Jaap Verweij;Rüdiger Wessalowski

  • Heating technology for malignant tumors: a review

    H. Petra Kok;Erik N.K. Cressman;Wim Ceelen;Christopher L. Brace

  • Comparison of CT, MRI and FDG-PET in response prediction of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer after multimodal preoperative therapy: Is there a benefit in using functional imaging?

    T. Denecke;B. Rau;K.-T. Hoffmann;B. Hildebrandt

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter M. Schlag
Peter M. Schlag Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Peter Deuflhard
Peter Deuflhard Zuse Institute Berlin
Bernd Hamm
Bernd Hamm Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Hans-Christian Hege
Hans-Christian Hege Zuse Institute Berlin
Jalid Sehouli
Jalid Sehouli Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Peter Neuhaus
Peter Neuhaus Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Michael H. Baumann
Michael H. Baumann National Institute on Drug Abuse
Klaus Petermann
Klaus Petermann Technical University of Berlin
Michael Bamberg
Michael Bamberg University of Tübingen
Claus Belka
Claus Belka Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative and complementary online degrees can broaden your career options in healthcare. Students interested in medicine may also consider administrative or advanced clinical roles, with flexible online pathways now widely available.

For those seeking to manage healthcare services, a health administration degree online can prepare you for leadership positions in hospitals, clinics, and health organizations. If you’re aiming for higher administrative responsibility, the cheapest online mha programs offer an accessible route to a master’s degree in healthcare administration.

Clinicians looking to elevate their practice might consider the cheapest dnp program to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice credential. Likewise, pharmacists and pre-med students can review pharmd online programs to pursue a Doctor of Pharmacy degree from home.

Evaluating these online degree options allows you to find the best fit for your goals—whether they focus on patient care, advanced practice, or healthcare management.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Wust

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles