World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
31
Citations
4485
World Ranking
9573
National Ranking
285

Kathryn M. Buller publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathryn M. Buller sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 75 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Kathryn M. Buller D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathryn M. Buller sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kathryn M. Buller is affiliated with the University of Queensland in Australia. Their academic profile reflects engagement in research and scholarly activities through this institution.

There is no publicly available information regarding recent papers, frequent co-authors, or common publication venues linked to this individual. Similarly, details about book publications, main fields of study, subfields, and main topics of work have not been documented in the accessible data.

Details of awards or honors received by Kathryn M. Buller are also not present in the available sources. The scientist is currently living, and no information suggests otherwise.

Due to the limited data on publications, collaborations, or research themes, this profile focuses primarily on the confirmed affiliation and current status without extrapolation beyond the provided facts.

Best Publications

  • Stressor categorization: acute physical and psychological stressors elicit distinctive recruitment patterns in the amygdala and in medullary noradrenergic cell groups.

    C.V. Dayas;K.M. Buller;J.W. Crane;Y. Xu

  • Chronic stress alters the density and morphology of microglia in a subset of stress-responsive brain regions

    Ross J. Tynan;Sundresan Naicker;Madeleine Hinwood;Eugene Nalivaiko

  • Neuroendocrine responses to an emotional stressor: evidence for involvement of the medial but not the central amygdala.

    C. V. Dayas;K. M. Buller;Trevor A. Day

  • Medial prefrontal cortex control of the paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus response to psychological stress: possible role of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis.

    Sarah J. Spencer;Kathryn M. Buller;Trevor A. Day

  • Therapeutic activity of C5a receptor antagonists in a rat model of neurodegeneration

    Trent M. Woodruff;James W. Crane;Lavinia. M. Proctor;Kathryn M. Buller

  • The central amygdala modulates hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis responses to systemic interleukin-1β administration

    Y. Xu;Trevor A. Day;K. M. Buller

  • Effects of chronic oestrogen replacement on stress-induced activation of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis control pathways.

    C. V. Dayas;Y. Xu;K. M. Buller;T. A. Day

  • Role of ventrolateral medulla catecholamine cells in hypothalamic neuroendocrine cell responses to systemic hypoxia

    DW Smith;KM Buller;Trevor A Day

  • Medullary neurones regulate hypothalamic corticotropin-releasing factor cell responses to an emotional stressor.

    C.V Dayas;K.M Buller;T.A Day

  • Dorsal and ventral medullary catecholamine cell groups contribute differentially to systemic interleukin-1beta-induced hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis responses.

    Kathryn Buller;Yangyang Xu;Christopher Dayas;Trevor Day

  • Post-insult minocycline treatment attenuates hypoxia-ischemia-induced neuroinflammation and white matter injury in the neonatal rat: a comparison of two different dose regimens.

    Michelle L. Carty;Julie A. Wixey;Paul B. Colditz;Kathryn M. Buller

  • Evidence that the Bed Nucleus of the Stria Terminalis Contributes to the Modulation of Hypophysiotropic Corticotropin-Releasing Factor Cell Responses to Systemic Interleukin-1β

    James W. Crane;Kathryn M. Buller;Trevor A. Day;Trevor A. Day

  • Minocycline: A neuroprotective agent for hypoxic‐ischemic brain injury in the neonate?

    Kathryn M. Buller;Michelle L. Carty;Hanna E. Reinebrant;Julie A. Wixey

  • Localization of a brain sulfotransferase, SULT4A1, in the human and rat brain: an immunohistochemical study.

    Nancy E. Liyou;Kathryn M. Buller;Michael J. Tresillian;Christopher M. Elvin

  • Indomethacin attenuates oxytocin and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis responses to systemic interleukin-1 beta

    KM Buller;Y Xu;TA Day

  • Hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus neurons regulate medullary catecholamine cell responses to restraint stress.

    Christopher V. Dayas;Kathryn M. Buller;Trevor A. Day

  • Differential recruitment of hypothalamic neuroendocrine and ventrolateral medulla catecholamine cells by non-hypotensive and hypotensive hemorrhages.

    Kathryn M. Buller;Douglas W. Smith;Trevor A. Day

  • Role of circumventricular organs in pro-inflammatory cytokine-induced activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis.

    Kathryn M Buller

  • Patterns of neuronal activation in the rat brain and spinal cord in response to increasing durations of restraint stress.

    James W. Crane;Kathryn R. French;Kathryn M. Buller

  • Developmental vitamin D (DVD) deficiency in the rat alters adult behaviour independently of HPA function.

    Darryl W. Eyles;Darryl W. Eyles;Fiona Rogers;Kathryn Buller;John J. McGrath;John J. McGrath

  • Central noradrenergic neurons signal via atp to elicit vasopressin responses to haemorrhage

    K. M. Buller;S. Khanna;J. R. Sibbald;Trevor A. Day

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher V. Dayas
Christopher V. Dayas University of Newcastle Australia
Sarah J. Spencer
Sarah J. Spencer RMIT University
Glenda C. Gobe
Glenda C. Gobe University of Queensland
David V. Pow
David V. Pow University of Queensland
Peter R. Dodd
Peter R. Dodd University of Queensland
John J. McGrath
John J. McGrath Aarhus University
Darryl W. Eyles
Darryl W. Eyles University of Queensland
Frederick R. Walker
Frederick R. Walker University of Newcastle Australia
Eugene Nalivaiko
Eugene Nalivaiko University of Newcastle Australia
Trent M. Woodruff
Trent M. Woodruff University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience often leads students to consider diverse educational and professional routes. Many related fields now offer flexible distance learning options. For example, those interested in clinical psychology might look into psyd psychology online programs, which prepare graduates for clinical and counseling roles.

Others may choose marriage and family therapy as a specialization. There are several mft programs available online, allowing students to begin their practice quickly and efficiently. For those seeking a faster academic journey, accelerated online programs help you complete a degree in a reduced timeframe, ideal for career changers or motivated learners.

Lastly, students focused on future earnings should explore high paying degrees relevant to neuroscience, such as biomedical engineering or computer science. By understanding these related degrees and pathways, you can tailor your education to your specific interests and career goals within the broader field of neuroscience.

Best Scientists Citing Kathryn M. Buller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles