World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
42
Citations
6399
World Ranking
7684
National Ranking
225

Eugene Nalivaiko publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eugene Nalivaiko sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 144 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Eugene Nalivaiko D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eugene Nalivaiko sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eugene Nalivaiko is affiliated with the University of Newcastle Australia. Their research encompasses multiple fields primarily within Psychology and Medicine, with a specific focus on areas such as Human-Computer Interaction, Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

Their work frequently addresses topics including Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts, Healthcare Professionals' Stress and Burnout, Human-Automation Interaction and Safety, Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue, Augmented Reality Applications, Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare, and Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control.

Recent publications by Eugene Nalivaiko include the following papers:

  • Current State and General Perceptions of the Use of Extended Reality (XR) Technology at the University of Newcastle: Interviews and Surveys From Staff and Students, 2022, published in SAGE Open
  • Development of a modular stress management platform (Performance Edge VR) and a pilot efficacy trial of a bio-feedback enhanced training module for controlled breathing, 2021, published in PLoS ONE
  • Development and Pilot Implementation of TACTICS VR: A Virtual Reality-Based Stroke Management Workflow Training Application and Training Framework, 2021, published in Frontiers in Neurology
  • Unraveling the Physiological Correlates of Mental Workload Variations in Tracking and Collision Prediction Tasks, 2022, published in IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
  • Evaluation of a Virtual Reality Platform to Train Stress Management Skills for a Defense Workforce: Multisite, Mixed Methods Feasibility Study, 2023, published in Journal of Medical Internet Research

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Eugene Nalivaiko include:

  • Frederick R. Walker
  • Murielle G. Kluge
  • Steven Maltby
  • Eugene Aidman
  • Nicole Walker

The scientist's work is commonly published in venues such as:

  • Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • SAGE Open
  • PLoS ONE
  • Frontiers in Neurology
  • IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering

Best Publications

  • Chronic stress alters the density and morphology of microglia in a subset of stress-responsive brain regions

    Ross J. Tynan;Sundresan Naicker;Madeleine Hinwood;Eugene Nalivaiko

  • A Systematic Review of Cybersickness

    Simon Davis;Keith Nesbitt;Eugene Nalivaiko

  • The yin and yang of cardiac autonomic control: Vago-sympathetic interactions revisited

    J.F.R. Paton;P. Boscan;A.E. Pickering;E. Nalivaiko

  • Cybersickness provoked by head-mounted display affects cutaneous vascular tone, heart rate and reaction time.

    Eugene Nalivaiko;Simon L. Davis;Karen L. Blackmore;Andrew Vakulin

  • Comparing the onset of cybersickness using the Oculus Rift and two virtual roller coasters

    Simon Davis;Keith Nesbitt;Eugene Nalivaiko

  • In the search for integrative biomarker of resilience to psychological stress

    Frederick R. Walker;Kane Pfingst;Luca Carnevali;Andrea Sgoifo

  • Profiling subjective symptoms and autonomic changes associated with cybersickness

    Alireza Mazloumi Gavgani;Keith V. Nesbitt;Karen L. Blackmore;Eugene Nalivaiko

  • A comparative study of cybersickness during exposure to virtual reality and "classic" motion sickness: are they different?

    Alireza Mazloumi Gavgani;Frederick R. Walker;Deborah M. Hodgson;Eugene Nalivaiko

  • Raphe magnus/pallidus neurons regulate tail but not mesenteric arterial blood flow in rats.

    W.W Blessing;E Nalivaiko

  • Long-term effects of prenatal stress: changes in adult cardiovascular regulation and sensitivity to stress.

    Francesca Mastorci;Massimo Vicentini;Odile Viltart;Massimo Manghi

  • Effects of visual flow direction on signs and symptoms of cybersickness.

    Alireza Mazloumi Gavgani;Deborah M. Hodgson;Eugene Nalivaiko

  • Relation between QT interval variability and cardiac sympathetic activity in hypertension

    Mathias Baumert;Markus P. Schlaich;Eugene Nalivaiko;Elisabeth Lambert

  • Short-term heart rate variability and cardiac norepinephrine spillover in patients with depression and panic disorder.

    Mathias Baumert;Gavin W. Lambert;Tye Dawood;Elisabeth A. Lambert

  • Correlating reaction time and nausea measures with traditional measures of cybersickness

    Keith Nesbitt;Simon Davis;Karen Blackmore;Eugene Nalivaiko

  • Regional blood flow and nociceptive stimuli in rabbits: patterning by medullary raphe, not ventrolateral medulla.

    W. W. Blessing;E. Nalivaiko

  • Cardiorespiratory Phase-Coupling Is Reduced in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea

    Muammar M. Kabir;Hany Dimitri;Prashanthan Sanders;Ral Antic

  • QT interval variability and cardiac norepinephrine spillover in patients with depression and panic disorder

    Mathias Baumert;Gavin W. Lambert;Tye Dawood;Elisabeth A. Lambert

  • Activation of 5-HT1A receptors in the medullary raphe reduces cardiovascular changes elicited by acute psychological and inflammatory stresses in rabbits.

    Eugene Nalivaiko;Youichirou Ootsuka;William Walter Blessing

  • Functional Programming of the Autonomic Nervous System by Early Life Immune Exposure: Implications for Anxiety

    Luba Sominsky;Erin A. Fuller;Evgeny Bondarenko;Lin Kooi Ong

  • Respiratory pattern in awake rats: Effects of motor activity and of alerting stimuli

    Muammar M. Kabir;Mirza I. Beig;Mathias Baumert;Mimosa Trombini

  • Motion sickness, nausea and thermoregulation: The “toxic” hypothesis

    Eugene Nalivaiko;John A. Rudd;Richard Hau Yue So

Frequent Co-Authors

Frederick R. Walker
Frederick R. Walker University of Newcastle Australia
William W. Blessing
William W. Blessing Flinders University
Derek Abbott
Derek Abbott University of Adelaide
Prashanthan Sanders
Prashanthan Sanders University of Adelaide
Gavin W. Lambert
Gavin W. Lambert Swinburne University of Technology
Julian F. R. Paton
Julian F. R. Paton University of Auckland
Inga D. Neumann
Inga D. Neumann University of Regensburg
Murray D. Esler
Murray D. Esler Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute
Rainer Landgraf
Rainer Landgraf Max Planck Society
Anthony E. Pickering
Anthony E. Pickering University of Bristol

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience opens doors to diverse career options, especially with the growing availability of flexible online education. An online bachelor's degree in neuroscience or a related field allows students to balance learning with work or personal obligations. Many reputable institutions offer accelerated pathways for those eager to start their careers sooner.

Graduates with neuroscience backgrounds can pursue jobs in research, healthcare, data analysis, and emerging tech sectors. According to recent reports, the highest paying degrees often include STEM fields, and neuroscience is gaining traction due to its critical role in innovation and medicine.

If you want excitement alongside a strong salary, explore fun majors in college that pay well. Neuroscience combines excitement, discovery, and the potential for high-earning roles.

Financing your education is also more accessible than ever. Many online colleges that accept financial aid help keep costs manageable while you pursue your degree and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Eugene Nalivaiko

Trending Scientists