World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Tatyana Strekalova

Tatyana Strekalova

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 43 7420 6843 207 193 142 6907

Tatyana Strekalova publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tatyana Strekalova between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tatyana Strekalova published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2021. 17 of the 163 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2021. 1995: 3 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 1 publication 2010: 1 publication 2011: 5 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 15 publications
1995 2025

163 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tatyana Strekalova: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 3
1996 2
1997 1
1998 2
1999 1
2000 0
2001 2
2002 1
2003 2
2004 3
2005 2
2006 2
2007 0
2008 1
2009 1
2010 1
2011 5
2012 6
2013 4
2014 6
2015 8
2016 10
2017 8
2018 8
2019 11
2020 15
2021 18
2022 15
2023 8
2024 2
2025 15
Total 163
Download as CSV

Tatyana Strekalova publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tatyana Strekalova sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 138–147 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 142 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456 142
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Tatyana Strekalova D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tatyana Strekalova sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467 43
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Tatyana Strekalova is affiliated with Maastricht University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience, medicine, and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Within these fields, Strekalova's work further narrows into subfields such as behavioral neuroscience, neurology, physiology, biological psychiatry, and cell biology.

The major topics of Strekalova's research include stress responses and cortisol, tryptophan and brain disorders, zebrafish biomedical research applications, neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms, neuroendocrine regulation and behavior, adipose tissue and metabolism, and neurotransmitter receptor influence on behavior.

Strekalova has contributed to a number of scientific publications. Significant recent papers include:

  • Chronic mild stress paradigm as a rat model of depression: facts, artifacts, and future perspectives, 2022, Psychopharmacology
  • Shared genetic background between children and adults with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, 2020, Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Understanding neurobehavioral effects of acute and chronic stress in zebrafish, 2020, Stress
  • Understanding how stress responses and stress-related behaviors have evolved in zebrafish and mammals, 2021, Neurobiology of Stress
  • Effects of acute and chronic arecoline in adult zebrafish: Anxiolytic-like activity, elevated brain monoamines and the potential role of microglia, 2020, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry

The scientist frequently publishes in venues such as the International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Biomolecules, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, Scientific Reports, and Neuroscience Letters.

Strekalova collaborates with other researchers extensively. Frequent co-authors include Allan V. Kalueff, Anna Gorlova, Konstantin A. Demin, Klaus-Peter Lesch, and Murilo S. de Abreu.

Best Publications

  • Stress-induced anhedonia in mice is associated with deficits in forced swimming and exploration.

    Tatyana Strekalova;Rainer Spanagel;Dusan Bartsch;Fritz A Henn

  • Impaired long-term memory and NR2A-type NMDA receptor-dependent synaptic plasticity in mice lacking c-Fos in the CNS

    Alexander Fleischmann;Oivind Hvalby;Vidar Jensen;Tatyana Strekalova

  • Stress-induced hyperlocomotion as a confounding factor in anxiety and depression models in mice.

    T. Strekalova;R. Spanagel;O. Dolgov;D. Bartsch

  • Measuring behavior in mice with chronic stress depression paradigm.

    Tatyana Strekalova;Harry W.M. Steinbusch

  • Insulin receptor in the brain: Mechanisms of activation and the role in the CNS pathology and treatment

    Igor Pomytkin;João P. Costa-Nunes;João P. Costa-Nunes;Vladimir Kasatkin;Ekaterina Veniaminova;Ekaterina Veniaminova

  • Update in the methodology of the chronic stress paradigm: internal control matters

    Tatyana Strekalova;Yvonne Couch;Natalia Kholod;Natalia Kholod;Marco Boyks

  • Microglial activation, increased TNF and SERT expression in the prefrontal cortex define stress-altered behaviour in mice susceptible to anhedonia

    Yvonne Couch;Daniel C. Anthony;Oleg Dolgov;Alexander Revischin

  • Memory retrieval after contextual fear conditioning induces c‐Fos and JunB expression in CA1 hippocampus

    T Strekalova;B Zörner;C Zacher;G Sadovska

  • Selective effects of citalopram in a mouse model of stress-induced anhedonia with a control for chronic stress.

    Tatyana Strekalova;Natalia Gorenkova;Edward Schunk;Oleg Dolgov

  • Mice with targeted mutations of glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid receptors: models for depression and anxiety?

    Peter Gass;Holger M. Reichardt;Tatyana Strekalova;Fritz Henn

  • Low-dose lipopolysaccharide (LPS) inhibits aggressive and augments depressive behaviours in a chronic mild stress model in mice.

    Yvonne Couch;Alexander Trofimov;Alexander Trofimov;Natalyia Markova;Vladimir Nikolenko

  • Cadherin-13, a risk gene for ADHD and comorbid disorders, impacts GABAergic function in hippocampus and cognition

    Olga Rivero;Martijn M Selten;S Sich;S Popp

  • Anhedonic-like traits and lack of affective deficits in 18-month-old C57BL/6 mice: Implications for modeling elderly depression.

    Ewa Malatynska;Harry W. M. Steinbusch;Olga Redkozubova;Alexei Bolkunov

  • Attenuated palmitoylation of serotonin receptor 5-HT1A affects receptor function and contributes to depression-like behaviors.

    Nataliya Gorinski;Monika Bijata;Sonal Prasad;Alexander Wirth

  • Interaction of brain 5-HT synthesis deficiency, chronic stress and sex differentially impact emotional behavior in Tph2 knockout mice

    Lise Gutknecht;Lise Gutknecht;Sandy Popp;Jonas Waider;Frank M. J. Sommerlandt

  • Deuterium content of water increases depression susceptibility: The potential role of a serotonin-related mechanism

    Tatyana Strekalova;Matthew Evans;Anton Chernopiatko;Yvonne Couch

  • Fibronectin domains of extracellular matrix molecule tenascin-C modulate hippocampal learning and synaptic plasticity.

    Tatyana Strekalova;Mu Sun;Mu Sun;Mirjam Sibbe;Matthias Evers

  • Tlr4 upregulation in the brain accompanies depression- and anxiety-like behaviors induced by a high-cholesterol diet.

    Tatyana Strekalova;Matthew Evans;Joao Costa-Nunes;Joao Costa-Nunes;Sergey Bachurin

  • Cyclic AMP Pathway Suppress Autoimmune Neuroinflammation by Inhibiting Functions of Encephalitogenic CD4 T Cells and Enhancing M2 Macrophage Polarization at the Site of Inflammation.

    Tatyana Veremeyko;Amanda W. Y. Yung;Marina Dukhinova;Inna S. Kuznetsova

  • Importance of NO/cGMP signalling via cGMP‐dependent protein kinase II for controlling emotionality and neurobehavioural effects of alcohol

    Claudia Werner;Gennadij Raivich;Michael Cowen;Tatyana Strekalova

Frequent Co-Authors

Klaus-Peter Lesch
Klaus-Peter Lesch University of Würzburg
Allan V. Kalueff
Allan V. Kalueff Ural Federal University
Daniel C. Anthony
Daniel C. Anthony University of Oxford
Harry W.M. Steinbusch
Harry W.M. Steinbusch Maastricht University
Raymond Cespuglio
Raymond Cespuglio Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Peter Gass
Peter Gass Heidelberg University
Daniel L.A. van den Hove
Daniel L.A. van den Hove Maastricht University
Andreas Reif
Andreas Reif Goethe University Frankfurt
Jan Haavik
Jan Haavik University of Bergen
Stefan Johansson
Stefan Johansson University of Bergen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a future in neuroscience, exploring online education options can provide flexibility and accessibility. Many students look into accelerated bachelor degree programs to fast-track their studies and enter the workforce sooner. These programs are ideal for motivated learners seeking a quicker path to their degree.

Choosing the right major is essential for career success and earning potential. Some of the best bachelor degrees to get can open doors to lucrative roles, especially in science, healthcare, and increasingly, interdisciplinary fields like neuroscience.

In addition, it’s helpful to research the highest paying jobs tied to different college majors. Knowing which fields offer the strongest salaries can help you strategically plan your education and career pathway.

Affordability is another key factor. If cost is a concern, consider the cheapest online colleges that accept fafsa to secure financial aid and keep your educational investment manageable while pursuing your neuroscience studies.

Best Scientists Citing Tatyana Strekalova

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles