World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Tatyana Strekalova

Tatyana Strekalova

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
43
Citations
6907
World Ranking
7420
National Ranking
207

Tatyana Strekalova publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tatyana Strekalova sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 142 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Tatyana Strekalova D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tatyana Strekalova sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tatyana Strekalova is affiliated with Maastricht University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience, medicine, and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Within these fields, Strekalova's work further narrows into subfields such as behavioral neuroscience, neurology, physiology, biological psychiatry, and cell biology.

The major topics of Strekalova's research include stress responses and cortisol, tryptophan and brain disorders, zebrafish biomedical research applications, neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms, neuroendocrine regulation and behavior, adipose tissue and metabolism, and neurotransmitter receptor influence on behavior.

Strekalova has contributed to a number of scientific publications. Significant recent papers include:

  • Chronic mild stress paradigm as a rat model of depression: facts, artifacts, and future perspectives, 2022, Psychopharmacology
  • Shared genetic background between children and adults with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, 2020, Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Understanding neurobehavioral effects of acute and chronic stress in zebrafish, 2020, Stress
  • Understanding how stress responses and stress-related behaviors have evolved in zebrafish and mammals, 2021, Neurobiology of Stress
  • Effects of acute and chronic arecoline in adult zebrafish: Anxiolytic-like activity, elevated brain monoamines and the potential role of microglia, 2020, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry

The scientist frequently publishes in venues such as the International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Biomolecules, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, Scientific Reports, and Neuroscience Letters.

Strekalova collaborates with other researchers extensively. Frequent co-authors include Allan V. Kalueff, Anna Gorlova, Konstantin A. Demin, Klaus-Peter Lesch, and Murilo S. de Abreu.

Best Publications

  • Stress-induced anhedonia in mice is associated with deficits in forced swimming and exploration.

    Tatyana Strekalova;Rainer Spanagel;Dusan Bartsch;Fritz A Henn

  • Impaired long-term memory and NR2A-type NMDA receptor-dependent synaptic plasticity in mice lacking c-Fos in the CNS

    Alexander Fleischmann;Oivind Hvalby;Vidar Jensen;Tatyana Strekalova

  • Stress-induced hyperlocomotion as a confounding factor in anxiety and depression models in mice.

    T. Strekalova;R. Spanagel;O. Dolgov;D. Bartsch

  • Measuring behavior in mice with chronic stress depression paradigm.

    Tatyana Strekalova;Harry W.M. Steinbusch

  • Insulin receptor in the brain: Mechanisms of activation and the role in the CNS pathology and treatment

    Igor Pomytkin;João P. Costa-Nunes;João P. Costa-Nunes;Vladimir Kasatkin;Ekaterina Veniaminova;Ekaterina Veniaminova

  • Update in the methodology of the chronic stress paradigm: internal control matters

    Tatyana Strekalova;Yvonne Couch;Natalia Kholod;Natalia Kholod;Marco Boyks

  • Microglial activation, increased TNF and SERT expression in the prefrontal cortex define stress-altered behaviour in mice susceptible to anhedonia

    Yvonne Couch;Daniel C. Anthony;Oleg Dolgov;Alexander Revischin

  • Memory retrieval after contextual fear conditioning induces c‐Fos and JunB expression in CA1 hippocampus

    T Strekalova;B Zörner;C Zacher;G Sadovska

  • Selective effects of citalopram in a mouse model of stress-induced anhedonia with a control for chronic stress.

    Tatyana Strekalova;Natalia Gorenkova;Edward Schunk;Oleg Dolgov

  • Mice with targeted mutations of glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid receptors: models for depression and anxiety?

    Peter Gass;Holger M. Reichardt;Tatyana Strekalova;Fritz Henn

  • Chronic mild stress paradigm as a rat model of depression: facts, artifacts, and future perspectives

    Unknown

  • Low-dose lipopolysaccharide (LPS) inhibits aggressive and augments depressive behaviours in a chronic mild stress model in mice.

    Yvonne Couch;Alexander Trofimov;Alexander Trofimov;Natalyia Markova;Vladimir Nikolenko

  • Cadherin-13, a risk gene for ADHD and comorbid disorders, impacts GABAergic function in hippocampus and cognition

    Olga Rivero;Martijn M Selten;S Sich;S Popp

  • Anhedonic-like traits and lack of affective deficits in 18-month-old C57BL/6 mice: Implications for modeling elderly depression.

    Ewa Malatynska;Harry W. M. Steinbusch;Olga Redkozubova;Alexei Bolkunov

  • Attenuated palmitoylation of serotonin receptor 5-HT1A affects receptor function and contributes to depression-like behaviors.

    Nataliya Gorinski;Monika Bijata;Sonal Prasad;Alexander Wirth

  • Interaction of brain 5-HT synthesis deficiency, chronic stress and sex differentially impact emotional behavior in Tph2 knockout mice

    Lise Gutknecht;Lise Gutknecht;Sandy Popp;Jonas Waider;Frank M. J. Sommerlandt

  • Deuterium content of water increases depression susceptibility: The potential role of a serotonin-related mechanism

    Tatyana Strekalova;Matthew Evans;Anton Chernopiatko;Yvonne Couch

  • Fibronectin domains of extracellular matrix molecule tenascin-C modulate hippocampal learning and synaptic plasticity.

    Tatyana Strekalova;Mu Sun;Mu Sun;Mirjam Sibbe;Matthias Evers

  • Tlr4 upregulation in the brain accompanies depression- and anxiety-like behaviors induced by a high-cholesterol diet.

    Tatyana Strekalova;Matthew Evans;Joao Costa-Nunes;Joao Costa-Nunes;Sergey Bachurin

  • Cyclic AMP Pathway Suppress Autoimmune Neuroinflammation by Inhibiting Functions of Encephalitogenic CD4 T Cells and Enhancing M2 Macrophage Polarization at the Site of Inflammation.

    Tatyana Veremeyko;Amanda W. Y. Yung;Marina Dukhinova;Inna S. Kuznetsova

  • Importance of NO/cGMP signalling via cGMP‐dependent protein kinase II for controlling emotionality and neurobehavioural effects of alcohol

    Claudia Werner;Gennadij Raivich;Michael Cowen;Tatyana Strekalova

Frequent Co-Authors

Klaus-Peter Lesch
Klaus-Peter Lesch University of Würzburg
Allan V. Kalueff
Allan V. Kalueff Ural Federal University
Daniel C. Anthony
Daniel C. Anthony University of Oxford
Harry W.M. Steinbusch
Harry W.M. Steinbusch Maastricht University
Raymond Cespuglio
Raymond Cespuglio Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Peter Gass
Peter Gass Heidelberg University
Daniel L.A. van den Hove
Daniel L.A. van den Hove Maastricht University
Andreas Reif
Andreas Reif Goethe University Frankfurt
Jan Haavik
Jan Haavik University of Bergen
Stefan Johansson
Stefan Johansson University of Bergen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a future in neuroscience, exploring online education options can provide flexibility and accessibility. Many students look into accelerated bachelor degree programs to fast-track their studies and enter the workforce sooner. These programs are ideal for motivated learners seeking a quicker path to their degree.

Choosing the right major is essential for career success and earning potential. Some of the best bachelor degrees to get can open doors to lucrative roles, especially in science, healthcare, and increasingly, interdisciplinary fields like neuroscience.

In addition, it’s helpful to research the highest paying jobs tied to different college majors. Knowing which fields offer the strongest salaries can help you strategically plan your education and career pathway.

Affordability is another key factor. If cost is a concern, consider the cheapest online colleges that accept fafsa to secure financial aid and keep your educational investment manageable while pursuing your neuroscience studies.

Best Scientists Citing Tatyana Strekalova

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles