World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ine Vanwesenbeeck

Ine Vanwesenbeeck

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
36
Citations
8315
World Ranking
9374
National Ranking
409

Ine Vanwesenbeeck publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ine Vanwesenbeeck sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 79 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Ine Vanwesenbeeck D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ine Vanwesenbeeck sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ine Vanwesenbeeck is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands and is active in the field of social sciences. Their research spans multiple subfields including general health professions, gender studies, sociology and political science, social psychology, and complementary and alternative medicine. The interdisciplinary nature of their work incorporates aspects of adolescent sexual and reproductive health, gender roles and identity studies, sex work and related issues, as well as complementary and alternative medicine studies.

The scientist's recent publications reflect a focus on sexuality, health programming, and complementary medicine topics. Key recent papers include:

  • Comprehensive Sexuality Education, 2020, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Global Public Health
  • Understanding Sexual Agency. Implications for Sexual Health Programming, 2021, Sexes
  • Horse owners' attitudes towards and motivators for using complementary and alternative veterinary medicine, 2021, Veterinary Record
  • An Implicit Measure of Sexual Double Standard Endorsement in Emerging Adults: Reliability and Validity Aspects, 2021, Sexuality & Culture
  • Sexual Double Standard Implicit Association Test, 2022, PsycTESTS Dataset

The main publication venues for their work include the PsycTESTS Dataset, Sexes, Veterinary Record, Sexuality & Culture, and the Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Global Public Health. This distribution highlights a blend of psychology, social sciences, and applied health research contexts.

Frequent collaborators contribute to the broad scope of their research. These co-authors include:

  • Jacques van Lankveld
  • Regina J. J. M. van den Eijnden
  • Tom ter Bogt
  • Ron Pat-El
  • Peggy M. J. Emmerink

The scientist's research topics integrate several domains:

  • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Sex work and related issues
  • Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Animal and Plant Science Education
  • Veterinary Equine Medical Research
  • LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy

This combination of topics and fields of study situates Ine Vanwesenbeeck's work at the intersection of public health, sociology, gender and sexuality studies, and veterinary science. Their output includes both theoretical and applied research components, contributing empirical insights to health education, sexual agency, and attitudes toward alternative treatment methods.

Best Publications

  • The Geographic Distribution of Big Five Personality Traits Patterns and Profiles of Human Self-Description Across 56 Nations

    David P. Schmitt;Jüri Allik;Robert R. McCrae;Verónica Benet-Martínez

  • Universal sex differences in the desire for sexual variety: Tests from 52 nations, 6 continents, and 13 islands

    David P. Schmitt

  • Another decade of social scientific work on sex work: a review of research 1990-2000.

    Ine Vanwesenbeeck

  • Patterns and Universals of Adult Romantic Attachment Across 62 Cultural Regions Are Models of Self and of Other Pancultural Constructs

    David P. Schmitt;Lidia Alcalay;Melissa Allensworth;Jüri Allik

  • Patterns and Universals of Mate Poaching Across 53 Nations: The Effects of Sex, Culture, and Personality on Romantically Attracting Another Person's Partner

    David P. Schmitt

  • Sexual orientation and mental and physical health status: findings from a Dutch population survey.

    Theo G.M. Sandfort;Floor Bakker;François G. Schellevis;Ine Vanwesenbeeck

  • Prostitutes' well-being and risk.

    Ine Vanwesenbeeck

  • Prevalence and correlates of young people's sexual aggression perpetration and victimisation in 10 European countries: a multi-level analysis

    Barbara Krahé;Anja Berger;Ine Vanwesenbeeck;Gabriel Bianchi

  • Burnout Among Female Indoor Sex Workers

    Ine Vanwesenbeeck

  • Sex Work Criminalization Is Barking Up the Wrong Tree

    Ine Vanwesenbeeck

  • Examining Sexual Health Differences between Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Heterosexual Adults: The Role of Sociodemographics, Sexual Behavior Characteristics, and Minority Stress

    Lisette Kuyper;Ine Vanwesenbeeck

  • Sexuality in Adolescent Boys with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Self-Reported Behaviours and Attitudes.

    Jeroen Dewinter;Robert Vermeiren;Ine Vanwesenbeeck;Ine Vanwesenbeeck;Jill Lobbestael

  • Prostitution Push and Pull: Male and Female Perspectives

    Ine Vanwesenbeeck

  • Alcohol and drug use in heterosexual and homosexual prostitution, and its relation to protection behaviour

    R. De Graaf;I. Vanwesenbeeck;G. Van Zessen;C. J. Straver

  • A matter of facts… and more: an exploratory analysis of the content of sexuality education in The Netherlands

    Rebecca M. Ferguson;Ine Vanwesenbeeck;Trudie Knijn

  • Sexual Trajectories during Adolescence: Relation to Demographic Characteristics and Sexual Risk

    Hanneke de Graaf;Ine Vanwesenbeeck;Suzanne Meijer;Liesbeth Woertman

  • Prevalence of sexual aggression among young people in Europe: a review of the evidence from 27 EU countries

    Barbara Krahé;Paulina Tomaszewska;Lisette Kuyper;Ine Vanwesenbeeck;Ine Vanwesenbeeck

  • Autism and normative sexual development: a narrative review

    Jeroen Dewinter;Robert Vermeiren;Robert Vermeiren;Ine Vanwesenbeeck;Ine Vanwesenbeeck;Chijs van Nieuwenhuizen

  • Parenting and Adolescents' Sexual Development in Western Societies A Literature Review

    Hanneke de Graaf;Ine Vanwesenbeeck;Liesbeth Woertman;Wim Meeus

  • Lower Psychological Well-Being and Excessive Sexual Interest Predict Symptoms of Compulsive Use of Sexually Explicit Internet Material Among Adolescent Boys

    Suzan M. Doornwaard;Regina J. J. M. van den Eijnden;Laura Baams;Ine Vanwesenbeeck

  • Do homosexual persons use health care services more frequently than heterosexual persons: findings from a Dutch population survey.

    Floor C. Bakker;Theo G.M. Sandfort;Ine Vanwesenbeeck;Hanneke van Lindert

Frequent Co-Authors

Tom F. M. ter Bogt
Tom F. M. ter Bogt Utrecht University
Robert Vermeiren
Robert Vermeiren Leiden University Medical Center
Theo G. M. Sandfort
Theo G. M. Sandfort Columbia University
Barbara Krahé
Barbara Krahé University of Potsdam
Judith Semon Dubas
Judith Semon Dubas Utrecht University
Wim Meeus
Wim Meeus Utrecht University
Maja Deković
Maja Deković Utrecht University
Marcel A. G. van Aken
Marcel A. G. van Aken Utrecht University
Geertjan Overbeek
Geertjan Overbeek University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring an online degree in Psychology opens diverse career opportunities. Many graduates pursue pathways such as clinical psychology, counseling, research, or social work. One rapidly growing field is substance abuse counseling, where demand is continually rising nationwide.

Requirements to become a substance abuse counselor can vary depending on the location. For example, substance abuse counselor requirements in Reno may differ from other cities in Nevada, with distinct licensing and education standards. If you are considering career options in Virginia, understanding substance abuse counselor requirements in Richmond will ensure you meet local qualifications.

For those thinking about working in California, it’s important to learn about becoming a substance abuse counselor in Riverside as well as how to become a substance abuse counselor in Sacramento. Each area may have its own unique application processes and supervised experience requirements. Knowing these differences early on can help you choose the right online degree program and advance your psychology career with confidence.

Best Scientists Citing Ine Vanwesenbeeck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles