World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Tom F. M. ter Bogt

Tom F. M. ter Bogt

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 55 4466 4135 215 206 144 8645

Tom F. M. ter Bogt publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tom F. M. ter Bogt between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tom F. M. ter Bogt published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 6.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2015. 6 of the 164 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2015. 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 9 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 2 publications
2000 2025

164 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tom F. M. ter Bogt: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 2
2001 2
2002 4
2003 5
2004 6
2005 3
2006 8
2007 5
2008 7
2009 10
2010 8
2011 4
2012 13
2013 7
2014 11
2015 16
2016 15
2017 9
2018 4
2019 2
2020 1
2021 9
2022 5
2023 2
2024 4
2025 2
Total 164
Download as CSV

Tom F. M. ter Bogt publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tom F. M. ter Bogt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 144 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 144
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Tom F. M. ter Bogt D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tom F. M. ter Bogt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 55
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Tom F. M. ter Bogt is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands and focuses primarily on research within psychology, social sciences, and the arts and humanities. Their work spans several subfields, including music, clinical psychology, gender studies, social psychology, and cognitive neuroscience.

Research topics explored by ter Bogt include:

  • Music History and Culture
  • Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Diverse Music Education Insights
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents

Tom ter Bogt has contributed to numerous publications, particularly in journals such as the Journal of Youth and Adolescence, PsycTESTS Dataset, Addictive Behaviors, Sexuality & Culture, and the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

Recent scholarly papers authored or co-authored by ter Bogt highlight diverse aspects of adolescent behavior and psychological development:

  • "Social Media Use and Adolescents' Sleep: A Longitudinal Study on the Protective Role of Parental Rules Regarding Internet Use before Sleep" (2021) published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • "The great decline in adolescent risk behaviours: Unitary trend, separate trends, or cascade?" (2022) published in Social Science & Medicine
  • "Grumpy or depressed? Disentangling typically developing adolescent mood from prodromal depression using experience sampling methods" (2021) published in the Journal of Adolescence
  • "Goth Music and Depressive Symptoms among Adolescents: A Longitudinal Study" (2020) published in the Journal of Youth and Adolescence
  • "Pornography Use Profiles and the Emergence of Sexual Behaviors in Adolescence" (2021) published in Archives of Sexual Behavior

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Regina J. J. M. van den Eijnden
  • Natale Canale
  • Alessio Vieno
  • William W. Hale
  • Kim Eva Dankoor

The combination of fields and topics illustrates an interdisciplinary approach, integrating clinical psychology and music studies with social and gender issues. The focus on adolescent psychosocial and emotional development is reflected across many of the publications and collaborative projects, often addressing the impacts of technology, media consumption, and music culture on youth behavior and mental health.

Best Publications

  • Different types of Internet use, depression, and social anxiety: the role of perceived friendship quality.

    Maarten H.W. Selfhout;Susan J.T. Branje;M. Delsing;Tom F.M. ter Bogt

  • Adolescents' music preferences and personality characteristics:

    Marc J. M. H. Delsing;Tom F. M. ter Bogt;Rutger C. M. E. Engels;Wim H. J. Meeus

  • Body mass index and body weight perception as risk factors for internalizing and externalizing problem behavior among adolescents.

    Tom F.M. ter Bogt;Saskia A.F.M. van Dorsselaer;Karin Monshouwer;Jacqueline E.E. Verdurmen

  • The role of music preferences in early adolescents' friendship formation and stability

    Maarten H. W. Selfhout;Susan J. T. Branje;Tom F. M. ter Bogt;Wim H. J. Meeus

  • The impact of heavy and disordered use of games and social media on adolescents' psychological, social, and school functioning.

    Regina van den Eijnden;Ina M. Koning;Suzan M. Doornwaard;Femke van Gurp

  • Preventing heavy alcohol use in adolescents (PAS): cluster randomized trial of a parent and student intervention offered separately and simultaneously

    Ina M Koning;Wilma A M Vollebergh;Filip Smit;Jacqueline E E Verdurmen

  • Decreases in adolescent weekly alcohol use in Europe and North America: evidence from 28 countries from 2002 to 2010.

    Margaretha de Looze;Quinten Raaijmakers;Tom ter Bogt;Pernille Bendtsen

  • "Shake It Baby, Shake It": Media Preferences, Sexual Attitudes and Gender Stereotypes Among Adolescents

    Tom F. M. ter Bogt;Rutger C. M. E. Engels;Sanne Bogers;Monique Kloosterman

  • “Partying” Hard: Party Style, Motives for and Effects of MDMA Use at Rave Parties

    Tom F. M. Ter Bogt;Rutger C. M. E. Engels

  • Influences of Risk Behaviors on the Quality of Peer Relations in Adolescence.

    Rutger C. M. E. Engels;Tom ter Bogt

  • Moved by Music: A Typology of Music Listeners.

    Tom F.M. Ter Bogt;Juul Mulder;Quinten A.W. Raaijmakers;Saoirse Nic Gabhainn

  • Gender specific trends in alcohol use: cross-cultural comparisons from 1998 to 2006 in 24 countries and regions.

    Bruce G. Simons-Morton;Tilda Farhat;Tom F. M. ter Bogt;Anne Hublet

  • Narcissistic adolescents' attention-seeking following social rejection: Links with social media disclosure, problematic social media use, and smartphone stress

    Skyler T. Hawk;Regina J.J.M. van den Eijnden;Caspar J. van Lissa;Tom F.M. ter Bogt

  • Cannabis use and mental health in secondary school children. Findings from a Dutch survey

    Karin Monshouwer;Saskia Van Dorsselaer;Jacqueline Verdurmen;Tom Ter Bogt

  • Intergenerational Continuity of Taste: Parental and Adolescent Music Preferences

    Tom F. M. ter Bogt;Marc J. M. H. Delsing;Maarten van Zalk;Peter G. Christenson

  • Changes in the Parental Bond and the Well-Being of Adolescents and Young Adults

    Frits van Wel;Tom ter Bogt;Quinten Raaijmakers

  • Music Taste Groups and Problem Behavior

    Juul Mulder;Tom ter Bogt;Quinten Raaijmakers;Wilma Vollebergh

  • Not early drinking but early drunkenness is a risk factor for problem behaviors among adolescents from 38 European and North American countries

    Emmanuel Kuntsche;Ingeborg Rossow;Bruce G. Simons-Morton;Tom Ter Bogt

  • Economic and cultural correlates of cannabis use among mid-adolescents in 31 countries.

    Tom ter Bogt;Holger Schmid;Saoirse Nic Gabhainn;Anastasios Fotiou

  • Trends and Socioeconomic Correlates of Adolescent Physical Fighting in 30 Countries

    William Pickett;Michal Molcho;Frank J. Elgar;Fiona Brooks

Frequent Co-Authors

Wilma A. M. Vollebergh
Wilma A. M. Vollebergh Utrecht University
Quinten A. W. Raaijmakers
Quinten A. W. Raaijmakers Utrecht University
Ine Vanwesenbeeck
Ine Vanwesenbeeck Utrecht University
Rutger C. M. E. Engels
Rutger C. M. E. Engels Erasmus University Rotterdam
Emmanuel Kuntsche
Emmanuel Kuntsche La Trobe University
Saoirse Nic Gabhainn
Saoirse Nic Gabhainn University of Galway
Wim Meeus
Wim Meeus Utrecht University
Saskia van Dorsselaer
Saskia van Dorsselaer Trimbos Institute
Gonneke W. J. M. Stevens
Gonneke W. J. M. Stevens Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens doors to a wide variety of online degree options and specialized pathways across the USA. For those seeking financial accessibility, many affordable online counseling degrees in the US provide quality education without a heavy financial burden.

Beyond affordability, geographical preferences and program reputations also play a key role. Learners interested in pursuing their education in the Southwest can check out the top-ranked counseling degree programs in Arizona. California residents or those seeking West Coast programs can explore popular counseling programs in California.

The Midwest also offers diverse educational options, with the top-ranked counseling degree programs in Chicago attracting students from across the country. Whatever your location or budget, there are flexible online and hybrid programs available to help launch or advance your psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Tom F. M. ter Bogt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles