World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
63
Citations
22964
World Ranking
9995
National Ranking
267

Trevor J. Biden publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Trevor J. Biden sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 125 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Trevor J. Biden D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Trevor J. Biden sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Trevor J. Biden is affiliated with the Garvan Institute of Medical Research in Australia and has a research focus spanning medicine, biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their work concentrates primarily on the fields of pancreatic function and diabetes, autophagy in disease and therapy, and related metabolic disorders.

The scientist's recent publications emphasize various aspects of metabolic regulation, cellular pathways, and disease mechanisms. Notable papers include:

  • SMOC1 is a glucose-responsive hepatokine and therapeutic target for glycemic control, 2020, Science Translational Medicine
  • A Selective Look at Autophagy in Pancreatic β-Cells, 2021, Diabetes
  • Short-term inhibition of autophagy benefits pancreatic β-cells by augmenting ether lipids and peroxisomal function, and by countering depletion of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids after fat-feeding, 2020, Molecular Metabolism
  • Heparan sulfate proteoglycans in beta cells provide a critical link between endoplasmic reticulum stress, oxidative stress and type 2 diabetes, 2021, PLoS ONE
  • β-cell function is regulated by metabolic and epigenetic programming of islet-associated macrophages, involving Axl, Mertk, and TGFβ receptor signaling, 2023, iScience

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Trevor J. Biden include Le May Thai, Nancy Sue, Chenxu Yan, Yan-Chuan Shi, and Kwan Yi Chu. These collaborations suggest an interdisciplinary network within cellular metabolism, diabetes research, and molecular biology.

The primary publication venues reflect the diverse nature of their studies and include Molecular Metabolism, Science Translational Medicine, Diabetes, PLoS ONE, and iScience.

Their main fields of study encompass:

  • Medicine
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Subfields of study as indicated by their research activities are:

  • Surgery
  • Molecular Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Epidemiology
  • Pharmacology

The key topics of Trevor J. Biden's research portfolio include:

  • Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease
  • Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
  • Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Amal Kamal Abdel-Aziz;Sara Abdelfatah;Mahmoud Abdellatif

  • Endoplasmic reticulum stress contributes to beta cell apoptosis in type 2 diabetes.

    D. R. Laybutt;A. M. Preston;M. C. Åkerfeldt;J. G. Kench

  • Ceramide generation is sufficient to account for the inhibition of the insulin-stimulated PKB pathway in C2C12 skeletal muscle cells pretreated with palmitate

    Carsten Schmitz-Peiffer;Denby L. Craig;Trevor J. Biden

  • Rapid mobilization of Ca2+ from rat insulinoma microsomes by inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate.

    M Prentki;T J Biden;D Janjic;R F Irvine

  • Molecular cloning and characterization of PKC iota, an atypical isoform of protein kinase C derived from insulin-secreting cells.

    L.A. Selbie;C Schmitz-Peiffer;Y Sheng;T.J. Biden

  • Alterations in the expression and cellular localization of protein kinase C isozymes epsilon and theta are associated with insulin resistance in skeletal muscle of the high-fat-fed rat.

    Carsten Schmitz-Peiffer;Carol L Browne;Nicholas D Oakes;Allan Watkinson

  • Protein Kinase Cζ Activation Mediates Glucagon-Like Peptide-1–Induced Pancreatic β-Cell Proliferation

    Jean Buteau;Sylvain Foisy;Christopher J. Rhodes;Lee Carpenter

  • Guanine nucleotides induce Ca2+-independent insulin secretion from permeabilized RINm5F cells.

    L Vallar;T J Biden;C B Wollheim

  • Structural subtypes of the dopamine D2 receptor are functionally distinct: expression of the cloned D2A and D2B subtypes in a heterologous cell line.

    G Hayes;T J Biden;L A Selbie;J Shine

  • Lipotoxic endoplasmic reticulum stress, β cell failure, and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

    Trevor J. Biden;Ebru Boslem;Kwan Yi Chu;Nancy Sue

  • Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate mobilizes intracellular Ca2+ from permeabilized insulin-secreting cells

    T J Biden;M Prentki;R F Irvine;M J Berridge

  • Expression Profiling of Palmitate- and Oleate-Regulated Genes Provides Novel Insights Into the Effects of Chronic Lipid Exposure on Pancreatic β-Cell Function

    Anna K. Busch;Damien Cordery;Gareth S. Denyer;Trevor J. Biden

  • Ca2+ regulates the inositol tris/tetrakisphosphate pathway in intact and broken preparations of insulin-secreting RINm5F cells.

    T J Biden;C B Wollheim

  • Ca2+-mediated generation of inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate and inositol 1,3,4,5-tetrakisphosphate in pancreatic islets. Studies with K+, glucose, and carbamylcholine.

    T.J. Biden;B. Peter-Riesch;W. Schlegel;C.B. Wollheim

  • Increased Fatty Acid Desaturation and Enhanced Expression of Stearoyl Coenzyme A Desaturase Protects Pancreatic β-Cells from Lipoapoptosis

    Anna K. Busch;Ebru Gurisik;Ebru Gurisik;Ebru Gurisik;Damien V. Cordery;Michelle Sudlow

  • Reduced endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-to-Golgi protein trafficking contributes to ER stress in lipotoxic mouse beta cells by promoting protein overload.

    A. M. Preston;A. M. Preston;A. M. Preston;E. Gurisik;E. Gurisik;C. Bartley;D. R. Laybutt;D. R. Laybutt

  • Second messenger function of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate. Early changes in inositol phosphates, cytosolic Ca2+, and insulin release in carbamylcholine-stimulated RINm5F cells.

    C B Wollheim;T J Biden

  • A Role for Protein Phosphatase 2A–Like Activity, but Not Atypical Protein Kinase Cζ, in the Inhibition of Protein Kinase B/Akt and Glycogen Synthesis by Palmitate

    Rosanna Cazzolli;Lee Carpenter;Trevor J. Biden;Carsten Schmitz-Peiffer

  • G protein-coupled receptor (GPR)40-dependent potentiation of insulin secretion in mouse islets is mediated by protein kinase D1

    M. Ferdaoussi;V. Bergeron;B. Zarrouki;J. Kolic

  • P-101: Alterations in the expression and cellular localization of protein kinase C isozymes are associated with insulin resistance in skeletal muscle of the high-fat-fed rat

    Carsten Schmitz-Peiffer;Carol L. Browne;Nicholas D. Oakes;Allan Watkinson

Frequent Co-Authors

Gregory J. Cooney
Gregory J. Cooney University of Sydney
Peter J. Meikle
Peter J. Meikle Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute
David E. James
David E. James University of Sydney
Nigel Turner
Nigel Turner University of New South Wales
Claes B. Wollheim
Claes B. Wollheim University of Geneva
Michael Leitges
Michael Leitges University of Oslo
Edward W. Kraegen
Edward W. Kraegen Garvan Institute of Medical Research
Mark A. Febbraio
Mark A. Febbraio Monash University
John Shine
John Shine Garvan Institute of Medical Research
Marc Prentki
Marc Prentki University of Montreal

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry opens doors to diverse online degree options and dynamic healthcare careers in the USA. Beyond traditional science tracks, students often explore related fields to gain practical skills and expand their employment possibilities.

For those seeking direct patient care roles, many choose online nursing programs—a fast-growing career area with strong demand. Others interested in the intersection of biology, health, and food science may prefer a nutritionist degree online, which lets graduates work in community health, research, or private practice.

Students aiming to pursue leadership positions in healthcare might consider top administrative programs, such as top cahme-accredited mha programs (Master of Health Administration). Additionally, those striving for the highest levels of clinical nursing practice may opt for a dnp program no clinical, which allows for greater flexibility and is ideal for working professionals.

No matter your path, online degrees make it easier to connect your background in Biology or Biochemistry with real-world, impactful careers.

Best Scientists Citing Trevor J. Biden

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles