World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
52
Citations
19769
World Ranking
4360
National Ranking
300

Johannes W. Kaiser publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johannes W. Kaiser sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 220 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Johannes W. Kaiser D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johannes W. Kaiser sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Johannes W. Kaiser is affiliated with the German Meteorological Service in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a significant emphasis on Global and Planetary Change and Atmospheric Science as main subfields.

The scientist's work covers several key topics including:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Climate variability and models
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations

Kaiser has published frequently in notable venues such as:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Remote Sensing
  • Geoscientific model development
  • Environmental Research Letters

Recent publications include:

  • How emissions uncertainty influences the distribution and radiative impacts of smoke from fires in North America, 2020, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Influx of African biomass burning aerosol during the Amazonian dry season through layered transatlantic transport of black carbon-rich smoke, 2020, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Global Climate, 2021, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Global Climate, 2022, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Country-Scale Analysis of Methane Emissions with a High-Resolution Inverse Model Using GOSAT and Surface Observations, 2020, Remote Sensing

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Kaiser include:

  • Rajesh Janardanan
  • Shamil Maksyutov
  • Tsuneo Matsunaga
  • Xin Lan
  • Yukio Yoshida

Best Publications

  • Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment

    Tami C. Bond;Sarah J. Doherty;D. W. Fahey;Piers Forster

  • Biomass burning emissions estimated with a global fire assimilation system based on observed fire radiative power

    J. W. Kaiser;A. Heil;M. O. Andreae;A. Benedetti

  • Evolution of anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of air pollutants at global and regional scales during the 1980–2010 period

    Claire Granier;Bertrand Bessagnet;Tami Bond;Ariela D'Angiola

  • Aerosol analysis and forecast in the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts Integrated Forecast System: 2. Data assimilation

    A. Benedetti;J.-J. Morcrette;O. Boucher;A. Dethof

  • Historic global biomass burning emissions for CMIP6 (BB4CMIP) based on merging satellite observations with proxies and fire models (1750-2015)

    Margreet J.E. Van Marle;Silvia Kloster;Brian I. Magi;Jennifer R. Marlon

  • Aerosol analysis and forecast in the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Integrated Forecast System : Forward modeling

    J.-J. Morcrette;O. Boucher;L. Jones;D. Salmond

  • The MACC reanalysis: an 8 yr data set of atmospheric composition

    A. Inness;F. Baier;A. Benedetti;I. Bouarar

  • The AeroCom evaluation and intercomparison of organic aerosol in global models

    K. Tsigaridis;K. Tsigaridis;N. Daskalakis;N. Daskalakis;M. Kanakidou;P. J. Adams

  • Fire carbon emissions over maritime southeast Asia in 2015 largest since 1997

    V. Huijnen;M. J. Wooster;M. J. Wooster;J. W. Kaiser;D. L. A. Gaveau

  • McClear: a new model estimating downwelling solar radiation at ground level in clear-sky conditions

    Mireille Lefèvre;Armel Oumbe;Armel Oumbe;Philippe Blanc;Bella Espinar

  • STATE OF THE CLIMATE IN 2017

    R. Abernethy;Steven A. Ackerman;R. Adler;Adelina Albanil Encarnación

  • State of the Climate in 2014

    Arlene P. Aaron-Morrison;Steven A. Ackerman;Nicolaus G. Adams;Robert F. Adler

  • Toward a Monitoring and Forecasting System For Atmospheric Composition: The GEMS Project

    A. Hollingsworth;R.J. Engelen;Christiane Textor;A. Benedetti

  • A regional air quality forecasting system over Europe : the MACC-II daily ensemble production

    V. Marecal;V. H Peuch;Camilla Andersson;S. Andersson

  • State of the Climate in 2018

    M. Ades;R. Adler;Laura S. Aldeco;G. Alejandra

  • Nine years of global hydrocarbon emissions based on source inversion of OMI formaldehyde observations

    Maite Bauwens;Trissevgeni Stavrakou;Jean François Müller;Isabelle De Smedt

  • State of the Climate in 2016

    Arlene P. Aaron-Morrison;Steven A. Ackerman;Nicolaus G. Adams;Robert F. Adler

  • Two global data sets of daily fire emission injection heights since 2003

    Samuel Rémy;Andreas Veira;Ronan Paugam;Mikhail Sofiev

  • Response of the Amazon carbon balance to the 2010 drought derived with CarbonTracker South America

    I.T. van der Laan-Luijkx;I.R. van der Velde;M.C. Krol;M.C. Krol;M.C. Krol;L.V. Gatti

  • Historical (1700–2012) global multi-model estimates of the fire emissions from the Fire Modeling Intercomparison Project (FireMIP)

    Fang Li;Maria Val Martin;Meinrat O. Andreae;Meinrat O. Andreae;Almut Arneth

  • How emissions uncertainty influences the distribution and radiative impacts of smoke from fires in North America

    Therese S. Carter;Colette L. Heald;Jose L. Jimenez;Pedro Campuzano-Jost

  • The PreVOCA experiment: Modeling the Lower Troposphere in the Southeast Pacific

    M. C. Wyant;R. Wood;Christopher S. Bretherton;C. R. Mechoso

  • [Regional Climates] Central South America 2016

    J. A. Marengo;Jhan Carlo Espinoza;L. M. Alves;J. Ronchail

Frequent Co-Authors

John P. Burrows
John P. Burrows University of Bremen
Heinrich Bovensmann
Heinrich Bovensmann University of Bremen
Angela Benedetti
Angela Benedetti European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
Michael E. Schaepman
Michael E. Schaepman University of Zurich
Guido R. van der Werf
Guido R. van der Werf Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Martin J. Wooster
Martin J. Wooster King's College London
Johannes Flemming
Johannes Flemming European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
Martin Schultz
Martin Schultz Forschungszentrum Jülich
Antje Inness
Antje Inness European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
Claire Granier
Claire Granier National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, pursuing related online general studies bachelor degree cheap options can be a practical choice. These programs offer a broad foundation at an affordable price, making them accessible for many learners.

Those wondering what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get might consider degrees in fields that complement environmental studies, such as geography or earth sciences. These courses provide relevant knowledge while often being less demanding, helping students balance academics with other commitments.

Specialized programs like online geology degrees offer in-depth understanding of the Earth's processes, a key aspect of environmental work. Graduates can pursue careers in research, resource management, or environmental consulting.

Additionally, earning a gis degree programs can open doors to roles in spatial analysis and mapping, essential skills in tracking environmental changes and planning sustainability initiatives.

Best Scientists Citing Johannes W. Kaiser

Trending Scientists