World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
66
Citations
14458
World Ranking
2111
National Ranking
172

Martin J. Wooster publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin J. Wooster sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 226 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Martin J. Wooster D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin J. Wooster sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin J. Wooster is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Environmental Science, with a focus on several subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Environmental Engineering, and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality.

The main topics of Wooster's work involve:

  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Urban Heat Island Mitigation
  • Fire dynamics and safety research

Their research has been published frequently in the following venues:

  • Remote Sensing
  • Remote Sensing of Environment
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Sensors

Wooster's recent papers include:

  • "Connections of climate change and variability to large and extreme forest fires in southeast Australia," 2021, Communications Earth & Environment
  • "Satellite remote sensing of active fires: History and current status, applications and future requirements," 2021, Remote Sensing of Environment
  • "Global impact of landscape fire emissions on surface level PM2.5 concentrations, air quality exposure and population mortality," 2021, Atmospheric Environment
  • "Post-monsoon air quality degradation across Northern India: assessing the impact of policy-related shifts in timing and amount of crop residue burnt," 2020, Environmental Research Letters
  • "Advances in the estimation of high Spatio-temporal resolution pan-African top-down biomass burning emissions made using geostationary fire radiative power (FRP) and MAIAC aerosol optical depth (AOD) data," 2020, Remote Sensing of Environment

Frequent co-authors in Wooster's publications include:

  • Mark Grosvenor
  • Tianran Zhang
  • Weidong Xu
  • Mark de Jong
  • Mary Langsdale

Best Publications

  • Connections of climate change and variability to large and extreme forest fires in southeast Australia

    Nerilie J. Abram;Benjamin J. Henley;Benjamin J. Henley;Alex Sen Gupta;Tanya J. R. Lippmann

  • Retrieval of biomass combustion rates and totals from fire radiative power observations: FRP derivation and calibration relationships between biomass consumption and fire radiative energy release

    Martin Wooster;G Roberts;G L W Perry;G L W Perry;Y J Kaufman

  • Fire radiative energy for quantitative study of biomass burning: derivation from the BIRD experimental satellite and comparison to MODIS fire products.

    Martin Wooster;B Zhukov;D Oertel

  • Fire carbon emissions over maritime southeast Asia in 2015 largest since 1997

    V. Huijnen;M. J. Wooster;M. J. Wooster;J. W. Kaiser;D. L. A. Gaveau

  • High Throughput Field Phenotyping of Wheat Plant Height and Growth Rate in Field Plot Trials Using UAV Based Remote Sensing

    Fenner Howard Holman;Andrew Riche;Adam Michalski;March Castle

  • Major atmospheric emissions from peat fires in Southeast Asia during non-drought years: evidence from the 2013 Sumatran fires.

    David L. A. Gaveau;Mohammad A. Salim;Kristell Hergoualc'h;Bruno Locatelli

  • A review of Ts/VI remote sensing based methods for the retrieval of land surface energy fluxes and soil surface moisture.

    George Petropoulos;T.N. Carlson;M Wooster;S Islam

  • Annual and diurnal african biomass burning temporal dynamics

    G. Roberts;Martin Wooster;E. Lagoudakis

  • Relationships between energy release, fuel mass loss, and trace gas and aerosol emissions during laboratory biomass fires

    Patrick H. Freeborn;Patrick H. Freeborn;Martin J. Wooster;Wei Min Hao;Cecily A. Ryan

  • Retrieval of biomass combustion rates and totals from fire radiative power observations: Application to southern Africa using geostationary SEVIRI imagery

    G Roberts;Martin Wooster;G L W Perry;G L W Perry;N Drake

  • Testing the potential of multi-spectral remote sensing for retrospectively estimating fire severity in African savannahs

    Alistair M.S. Smith;Martin J. Wooster;Nick A. Drake;Frederick M. Dipotso

  • Satellite remote sensing of active fires: History and current status, applications and future requirements

    Martin J. Wooster;Gareth J. Roberts;Louis Giglio;David Roy

  • Fire Detection and Fire Characterization Over Africa Using Meteosat SEVIRI

    G.J. Roberts;M.J. Wooster

  • Connecting Earth observation to high-throughput biodiversity data

    Alex Bush;Alex Bush;Alex Bush;Rahel Sollmann;Andreas Wilting;Kristine Bohmann;Kristine Bohmann

  • Effusion rate trends at Etna and Krafla and their implications for eruptive mechanisms

    A J L Harris;A J L Harris;J B Murray;S E Aries;Meirion Davies

  • Derivation of an urban materials spectral library through emittance and reflectance spectroscopy

    Simone Kotthaus;Simone Kotthaus;Thomas E.L. Smith;Martin J. Wooster;C.S.B. Grimmond;C.S.B. Grimmond

  • Production of Landsat ETM+ reference imagery of burned areas within Southern African savannahs: comparison of methods and application to MODIS

    A. M. S. Smith;N. A. Drake;M. J. Wooster;A. T. Hudak

  • Global characterization of biomass-burning patterns using satellite measurements of fire radiative energy

    Charles Ichoku;Charles Ichoku;Louis Giglio;Martin J. Wooster;Lorraine A. Remer

  • Boreal forest fires burn less intensely in Russia than in North America

    Martin Wooster;Y H Zhang

  • Fire, drought and El Niño relationships on Borneo (Southeast Asia) in the pre-MODIS era (1980–2000)

    M. J. Wooster;G. L. W. Perry;A. Zoumas

  • Small-scale experimental testing of fire radiative energy for quantifying mass combusted in natural vegetation fires.

    Martin J. Wooster

  • Thermal remote sensing of active vegetation fires and biomass burning events [Chapter 18]

    Martin J. Wooster;Gareth Roberts;Alistair M.S. Smith;Joshua Johnston

Frequent Co-Authors

Johannes W. Kaiser
Johannes W. Kaiser German Meteorological Service
George L. W. Perry
George L. W. Perry University of Auckland
Nicholas Drake
Nicholas Drake King's College London
George P. Petropoulos
George P. Petropoulos National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
David A. Rothery
David A. Rothery The Open University
Toby N. Carlson
Toby N. Carlson Pennsylvania State University
Saulo R. Freitas
Saulo R. Freitas National Institute for Space Research
Daniel Murdiyarso
Daniel Murdiyarso IPB University
Alistair M. S. Smith
Alistair M. S. Smith University of Idaho
Guido R. van der Werf
Guido R. van der Werf Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their knowledge in Environmental Sciences, various online degree options offer flexible pathways. Professionals aiming to move into leadership or academic roles might consider programs such as the eds to edd bridge program, which builds advanced educational expertise with a specialization that can complement environmental studies.

Students looking to apply environmental knowledge to community welfare and social frameworks may benefit from a dsw program. This path integrates social work leadership with environmental advocacy, helping graduates address environmental challenges through social policy and community engagement.

For those seeking cost-effective education in related fields, exploring the cheapest online general studies degree programs can be a practical starting point. These programs offer interdisciplinary approaches, allowing customization to focus on environmental topics at an affordable rate.

Additionally, individuals new to higher education or switching careers might prefer some of the easy bachelor degrees available online. These tend to have more flexible requirements, making them accessible paths toward building foundational knowledge relevant to Environmental Sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Martin J. Wooster

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles