World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Genetics
USA
2026
Award Badge
Genetics and Molecular Biology
UK
2024

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
157
Citations
198906
World Ranking
106
National Ranking
54

Richard M. Myers publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard M. Myers sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 487 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Richard M. Myers D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard M. Myers sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 157 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Genetics in United States Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Genetics in United States Leader Award
  • 2024 - Research.com Genetics in United States Leader Award
  • 2024 - Research.com Genetics and Molecular Biology in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Genetics in United States Leader Award
  • 2011 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Richard M. Myers is affiliated with the HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology in the United States. Their work spans several interconnected areas within molecular biology and genetics, contributing to significant research in genomics, neurodevelopmental disorders, and rare diseases.

The scientist's recent publications include studies published across high-impact journals such as Nature, Nature Genetics, Genome Biology, Science Advances, and others. Notable papers are:

  • Rare coding variants in ten genes confer substantial risk for schizophrenia (2022, Nature)
  • Exome sequencing identifies rare damaging variants in ATP8B4 and ABCA1 as risk factors for Alzheimer's disease (2022, Nature Genetics)
  • Assembly of the threespine stickleback Y chromosome reveals convergent signatures of sex chromosome evolution (2020, Genome Biology)
  • Occupancy maps of 208 chromatin-associated proteins in one human cell type (2020, Nature)
  • Predicting future from past: The genomic basis of recurrent and rapid stickleback evolution (2021, Science Advances)

Their coauthors frequently include J. Nicholas Cochran, Stanley J. Watson, Iván Rodríguez-Nunez, Huda Akil, and William E. Bunney, with collaboration counts ranging from 15 to 32 works.

The scientist publishes often in specific venues, with the highest number of publications appearing in ENCODE Datasets, followed by bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Genome Research, Gastroenterology, and The American Journal of Human Genetics.

Primary subfields of study associated with their research include:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • Immunology
  • Physiology

The main topics covered in their work consist of:

  • Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • RNA Research and Splicing
  • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Alzheimer's Disease Research and Treatments

In 2011, Richard M. Myers was recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).

Best Publications

  • Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome.

    Eric S. Lander;Lauren M. Linton;Bruce Birren;Chad Nusbaum

  • Model-based Analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS)

    Yong Zhang;Tao Liu;Clifford A Meyer;Jérôme Eeckhoute

  • Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma

    D. Bell;A. Berchuck;M. Birrer;J. Chien

  • Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways

    Roger McLendon;Allan Friedman;Darrell Bigner;Erwin G. Van Meir

  • Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project

    Ewan Birney;John A. Stamatoyannopoulos;Anindya Dutta;Roderic Guigó

  • Worldwide human relationships inferred from genome-wide patterns of variation.

    Jun Z. Li;Devin M. Absher;Hua Tang;Audrey M. Southwick

  • Genome-Wide Mapping of in Vivo Protein-DNA Interactions

    David S. Johnson;Ali Mortazavi;Ali Mortazavi;Richard M. Myers;Richard M. Myers;Barbara Wold;Barbara Wold

  • The ENCODE (ENCyclopedia of DNA elements) Project

    E. A. Feingold;P. J. Good;M. S. Guyer;S. Kamholz

  • A reference panel of 64,976 haplotypes for genotype imputation

    Shane McCarthy;Sayantan Das;Warren Kretzschmar;Olivier Delaneau

  • Generation and initial analysis of more than 15,000 full-length human and mouse cDNA sequences.

    Robert L Strausberg;Elise A Feingold;Lynette H Grouse;Jeffery G Derge

  • An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome

    Ian Dunham;Anshul Kundaje;Shelley F. Aldred;Patrick J. Collins

  • Expanded encyclopaedias of DNA elements in the human and mouse genomes

    Jill E. Moore;Michael J. Purcaro;Henry E. Pratt;Charles B. Epstein

  • ChIP-seq guidelines and practices of the ENCODE and modENCODE consortia

    Stephen G. Landt;Georgi K. Marinov;Anshul Kundaje;Pouya Kheradpour

  • Genetic relationship between five psychiatric disorders estimated from genome-wide SNPs

    S. Hong Lee;Stephan Ripke;Stephan Ripke;Benjamin M. Neale;Benjamin M. Neale;Stephen V. Faraone

  • Human Homolog of patched, a Candidate Gene for the Basal Cell Nevus Syndrome

    Ronald L. Johnson;Alana L. Rothman;Jingwu Xie;Lisa V. Goodrich

  • Evolving gene/transcript definitions significantly alter the interpretation of GeneChip data.

    Manhong Dai;Pinglang Wang;Andrew D Boyd;Georgi Kostov

  • Signals of recent positive selection in a worldwide sample of human populations

    Joseph K. Pickrell;Graham Coop;John Novembre;Sridhar Kudaravalli

  • The genomic basis of adaptive evolution in threespine sticklebacks

    Felicity C. Jones;Manfred G. Grabherr;Manfred G. Grabherr;Yingguang Frank Chan;Pamela Russell

  • Attachment of a 40-base-pair G + C-rich sequence (GC-clamp) to genomic DNA fragments by the polymerase chain reaction results in improved detection of single-base changes.

    Val C. Sheffield;David R. Cox;Leonard S. Lerman;Richard M. Myers

  • Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma

    D. Bell;A. Berchuck;M. Birrer;J. Chien

Frequent Co-Authors

Huda Akil
Huda Akil University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Devin Absher
Devin Absher University of Queensland
Jun Li
Jun Li University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
William E. Bunney
William E. Bunney University of California, Irvine
Jeremy Schmutz
Jeremy Schmutz Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Alan F. Schatzberg
Alan F. Schatzberg Stanford University
Stanley J. Watson
Stanley J. Watson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jane Grimwood
Jane Grimwood HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology
Edward G. Jones
Edward G. Jones University of California, Davis
Jack D. Barchas
Jack D. Barchas Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in genetics opens doors to several online pathways that offer flexibility and specialized options. For those interested in healthcare but not looking to pursue a full science degree, consider online medical billing and coding schools that accept fafsa. These programs provide a valuable entry point into the medical field without extensive lab work and allow you to benefit from financial aid.

Students eager to start their careers quickly should look into accelerated career programs. These fast-track options help you earn your degree in less time, getting you into the workforce sooner.

Flexibility is essential for many learners. A self paced online degree allows you to tailor your study schedule without sacrificing educational quality—ideal for those balancing commitments or working part-time.

For prospective students looking to minimize upfront costs, research online college free application options. Applying can be risk-free and more accessible, expanding your chances of finding the perfect genetic science or related program to fit your needs.

Best Scientists Citing Richard M. Myers

Trending Scientists