World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Robert B. Cody

Robert B. Cody

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 48 15089 13598 1179 1069 148 10531

Robert B. Cody publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Robert B. Cody between 1977 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Robert B. Cody published across 49 years, from 1977 to 2025, averaging 3.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2016. 15 of the 172 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2016. 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 6 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 6 publications 1987: 6 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 3 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 3 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 8 publications
1977 2025

172 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Robert B. Cody: publications per year, 1977 to 2025
Year Publications
1977 1
1978 0
1979 2
1980 2
1981 1
1982 6
1983 1
1984 0
1985 4
1986 6
1987 6
1988 3
1989 2
1990 1
1991 0
1992 3
1993 1
1994 1
1995 0
1996 0
1997 1
1998 0
1999 0
2000 2
2001 0
2002 1
2003 3
2004 5
2005 5
2006 5
2007 4
2008 1
2009 3
2010 5
2011 1
2012 3
2013 7
2014 8
2015 5
2016 10
2017 6
2018 9
2019 9
2020 7
2021 5
2022 8
2023 4
2024 7
2025 8
Total 172
Download as CSV

Robert B. Cody publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert B. Cody sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 148 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218 148
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Robert B. Cody D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert B. Cody sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835 48
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Robert B. Cody is affiliated with JEOL (Japan) in Japan, contributing to multiple areas within chemistry and biological sciences. Their research spans several fields including spectroscopy, analytical chemistry, insect science, food science, and molecular biology.

The scientist's main areas of study include:

  • Chemistry
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences

More specific subfields in which they have published work are:

  • Spectroscopy
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Insect Science
  • Food Science
  • Molecular Biology

Robert B. Cody's research topics emphasize:

  • Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
  • Insect and Pesticide Research
  • Oil Spill Detection and Mitigation
  • Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
  • Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies

Frequent co-authors partnering with Robert B. Cody include Pamela Brunswick, Dayue Shang, Jeffrey Yan, Honoria Kwok, and Taylor Filewood. Collaborative connections reflect ongoing engagement with researchers active in related fields.

Publications by Robert B. Cody have appeared in several frequent venues, with notable numbers of contributions in:

  • Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
  • Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
  • ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS RESEARCH
  • ACS Omega
  • Analytical Methods

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Robert B. Cody include:

  • Saccharomyces cerevisiae and S. pastorianus species and strain differentiation by direct analysis in real time time-of-flight mass spectrometry, 2020, Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
  • Cuticular hydrocarbons for identifying Sarcophagidae (Diptera), 2021, Scientific Reports
  • Cuticular hydrocarbons for the identification and geographic assignment of empty puparia of forensically important flies, 2022, International Journal of Legal Medicine
  • Degradation strategies for structural characterization of insoluble synthetic polymers by mass spectrometry, 2024, Mass Spectrometry Reviews
  • Rapid Fingerprinting of High-Molecular-Weight Polymers by Laser Desorption-Ionization Using Through-Hole Alumina Membrane High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry, 2020, Analytical Chemistry

Best Publications

  • Versatile New Ion Source for the Analysis of Materials in Open Air under Ambient Conditions

    Robert B. Cody;and James A. Laramée;H. Dupont Durst

  • Atmospheric pressure ion source

    Robert B. Cody;James A. Laramee

  • Observation of molecular ions and analysis of nonpolar compounds with the direct analysis in real time ion source.

    Robert B. Cody

  • Collision-induced dissociation with Fourier transform mass spectrometry

    R. B. Cody;R. C. Burnier;B. S. Freiser

  • Characterization of Solid Counterfeit Drug Samples by Desorption Electrospray Ionization and Direct-analysis-in-real-time Coupled to Time-of-flight Mass Spectrometry

    Facundo M. Fernández;Robert B. Cody;Michael D. Green;Christina Y. Hampton

  • Collision-induced dissociation in a fourier-transform mass spectrometer

    R.B. Cody;B.S. Freiser

  • Electron impact excitation of ions from organics: an alternative to collision induced dissociation

    R. B. Cody;B. S. Freiser

  • Laser ionization source for ion cyclotron resonance spectroscopy. Application to atomic metal ion chemistry

    R.B. Cody;R.C. Burnier;W.D. Reents;T.J. Carlin

  • Differentiating Writing Inks Using Direct Analysis in Real Time Mass Spectrometry

    Roger W. Jones;Robert B. Cody;John Frederick McClelland

  • Applications of Direct Analysis in Real Time Mass Spectrometry (DART-MS) in Allium Chemistry. 2-Propenesulfenic and 2-Propenesulfinic Acids, Diallyl Trisulfane S-Oxide, and Other Reactive Sulfur Compounds from Crushed Garlic and Other Alliums

    Eric Block;A. John Dane;Siji Thomas;Robert B. Cody

  • Cuticular hydrocarbon analysis of an awake behaving fly using direct analysis in real-time time-of-flight mass spectrometry

    Joanne Y. Yew;Robert B. Cody;Edward A. Kravitz

  • Developments in analytical fourier-transform mass spectrometry

    Robert B. Cody;James A. Kinsinger;Sahba Ghaderi;I.Jonathan Amster

  • Electrospray ionization/magnetic sector mass spectrometry: calibration, resolution, and accurate mass measurements

    Robert B. Cody;Jun. Tamura;Brian D. Musselman

  • Ambient generation of fatty acid methyl ester ions from bacterial whole cells by direct analysis in real time (DART) mass spectrometry

    Carrie Y. Pierce;Carrie Y. Pierce;John R. Barr;Robert B. Cody;Robert F. Massung

  • Consecutive collision-induced dissociations in Fourier transform mass spectrometry

    R. B. Cody;R. C. Burnier;C. J. Cassady;B. S. Freiser

  • COLLISION‐INDUCED DISSOCIATION OF PROTON‐BOUND ALCOHOL DIMERS BY FOURIER‐TRANSFORM MASS SPECTROMETRY

    R. C. Burnier;R. B. Cody;B. S. Freiser

  • Applications of direct analysis in real time-mass spectrometry (DART-MS) in Allium chemistry. (Z)-butanethial S-oxide and 1-butenyl thiosulfinates and their S-(E)-1-butenylcysteine S-oxide precursor from Allium siculum.

    Roman Kubec;Robert B. Cody;A. John Dane;Rabi A. Musah

  • Distinguishing wild from cultivated agarwood (Aquilaria spp.) using direct analysis in real time and time of-flight mass spectrometry

    Edgard O. Espinoza;Cady A. Lancaster;Natasha M. Kreitals;Masataka Hata

  • Peptide mixture sequencing by tandem Fourier-transform mass spectrometry

    R B Cody;I J Amster;F W McLafferty

  • Selective ionization of melamine in powdered milk by using argon direct analysis in real time (DART) mass spectrometry

    A. John Dane;Robert B. Cody

  • Energy-resolved tandem and fourier-transform mass spectrometry

    S.A. McLuckey;L. Sallans;R.B. Cody;R.C. Burnier

Frequent Co-Authors

Jean-François Focant
Jean-François Focant University of Liège
Charles A. Wilkie
Charles A. Wilkie Marquette University
Eric Block
Eric Block University at Albany, State University of New York
Mark A. Adams
Mark A. Adams University of Sydney
Fred W. McLafferty
Fred W. McLafferty Cornell University
Nicholas J. White
Nicholas J. White Mahidol University
Paul N. Newton
Paul N. Newton University of Oxford
Hans Beeckman
Hans Beeckman Royal Museum for Central Africa
Facundo M. Fernández
Facundo M. Fernández Georgia Institute of Technology
Falko P. Drijfhout
Falko P. Drijfhout Keele University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to various career paths that often intersect with other fields. For example, those interested in legal aspects related to chemical industries may explore the best online associate degree programs in criminal justice, which can provide foundational knowledge applicable in regulatory and compliance roles.

Alternatively, pursuing a paralegal certificate is beneficial for chemistry graduates interested in supporting patent law, environmental law, or pharmaceutical litigation.

For those keen on the pharmaceutical sector, career pathways such as becoming a drug representative offer promising prospects. Insights on how much do drug reps make can help gauge the financial rewards and career growth opportunities in this field.

Furthermore, individuals aiming for advanced expertise might consider the route to becoming a pharmacist. Understanding how long does it take to become a pharmacist is crucial for planning the educational timeline and commitments involved.

Best Scientists Citing Robert B. Cody

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles