World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
41
Citations
6863
World Ranking
6965
National Ranking
1896

Olga Boric-Lubecke publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olga Boric-Lubecke sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 221 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Olga Boric-Lubecke D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olga Boric-Lubecke sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to biomedical microwave technology

Overview

Olga Boric-Lubecke is affiliated with the University of Hawaii at Manoa in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of engineering and medicine, with notable focus on biomedical engineering and surgery as significant subfields. Electrical and electronic engineering and signal processing also constitute important areas within their work.

The scientist's research topics include:

  • Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
  • User Authentication and Security Systems

Olga Boric-Lubecke has contributed scholarly articles to various reputable publication venues. Frequent venues include:

  • IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques
  • IEEE Journal of Microwaves
  • IEEE Access
  • Building and Environment
  • Scientific Reports

Recent papers associated with Olga Boric-Lubecke are:

  • "Concurrent Respiration Monitoring of Multiple Subjects by Phase-Comparison Monopulse Radar Using Independent Component Analysis (ICA) With JADE Algorithm and Direction of Arrival (DOA)" (2020), IEEE Access
  • "Sensing of Life Activities at the Human-Microwave Frontier" (2021), IEEE Journal of Microwaves
  • "Ten questions concerning human-building interaction research for improving the quality of life" (2022), Building and Environment
  • "Radar-Based Non-Contact Continuous Identity Authentication" (2020), Remote Sensing
  • "The field of human building interaction for convergent research and innovation for intelligent built environments" (2022), Scientific Reports

Frequent co-authors contributing alongside Olga Boric-Lubecke include:

  • Victor M. Lubecke
  • Shekh Md Mahmudul Islam
  • Yao Zheng
  • Amy D. Droitcour
  • Jannatun Noor Sameera

In 2015, Olga Boric-Lubecke was designated an IEEE Fellow for contributions to biomedical microwave technology.

Best Publications

  • A Review on Recent Advances in Doppler Radar Sensors for Noncontact Healthcare Monitoring

    Changzhi Li;Victor M. Lubecke;Olga Boric-Lubecke;Jenshan Lin

  • Range correlation and I/Q performance benefits in single-chip silicon Doppler radars for noncontact cardiopulmonary monitoring

    A.D. Droitcour;O. Boric-Lubecke;V.M. Lubecke;J. Lin

  • A microwave radio for Doppler radar sensing of vital signs

    A. Droitcour;V. Lubecke;Jenshan Lin;O. Boric-Lubecke

  • Frequency-tuning technique for remote detection of heartbeat and respiration using low-power double-sideband transmission in the ka-band

    Yanming Xiao;J. Lin;O. Boric-Lubecke;M. Lubecke

  • Signal-to-Noise Ratio in Doppler Radar System for Heart and Respiratory Rate Measurements

    A.D. Droitcour;O. Boric-Lubecke;G.T.A. Kovacs

  • Assessment of Heart Rate Variability and Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia via Doppler Radar

    W. Massagram;V.M. Lubecke;A. Host-Madsen;O. Boric-Lubecke

  • Non-contact respiratory rate measurement validation for hospitalized patients

    Amy D. Droitcour;Todd B. Seto;Byung-Kwon Park;Shuhei Yamada

  • 0.25 /spl mu/m CMOS and BiCMOS single-chip direct-conversion Doppler radars for remote sensing of vital signs

    A.D. Droitcour;O. Boric-Lubecke;V.M. Lubecke;Jenshan Lin

  • Through-the-Wall Radar Life Detection and Monitoring

    V.M. Lubecke;O. Boric-Lubecke;A. Host-Madsen;A.E. Fathy

  • Data-Based Quadrature Imbalance Compensation for a CW Doppler Radar System

    Aditya Singh;Xiaomeng Gao;Ehsan Yavari;Mari Zakrzewski

  • A Ka-Band Low Power Doppler Radar System for Remote Detection of Cardiopulmonary Motion

    Yanming Xiao;Jenshan Lin;O. Boric-Lubecke;V.M. Lubecke

  • Detection of Multiple Heartbeats Using Doppler Radar

    Unknown

  • Ten questions concerning human-building interaction research for improving the quality of life

    Unknown

  • Cancellation of Unwanted Doppler Radar Sensor Motion Using Empirical Mode Decomposition

    I. Mostafanezhad;E. Yavari;O. Boric-Lubecke;V. M. Lubecke

  • Quadrature Imbalance Compensation With Ellipse-Fitting Methods for Microwave Radar Physiological Sensing

    Mari Zakrzewski;Aditya Singh;Ehsan Yavari;Xiaomeng Gao

  • The field of human building interaction for convergent research and innovation for intelligent built environments

    Unknown

  • Concurrent Respiration Monitoring of Multiple Subjects by Phase-Comparison Monopulse Radar Using Independent Component Analysis (ICA) With JADE Algorithm and Direction of Arrival (DOA)

    Shekh M. M. Islam;Olga Boric-Lubecke;Victor M. Lubekce

  • Doppler Radar Techniques for Accurate Respiration Characterization and Subject Identification

    Ashikur Rahman;Victor M. Lubecke;Olga Boric-Lubecke;Jan H. Prins

  • Application of empirical mode decomposition in removing fidgeting interference in doppler radar life signs monitoring devices

    Isar Mostafanezhad;Olga Boric-Lubecke;Victor Lubecke;Danilo P. Mandic

  • E-healthcare: Remote monitoring, privacy, and security

    Unknown

  • Range correlation effect on ISM band I/Q CMOS radar for non-contact vital signs sensing

    A.D. Droitcour;O. Boric-Lubecke;V.M. Lubecke;J. Lin

  • Sensing of Life Activities at the Human-Microwave Frontier

    Changzhi Li;Victor M. Lubecke;Olga Boric-Lubecke;Jenshan Lin

  • Good Night: Sleep Monitoring Using a Physiological Radar Monitoring System Integrated with a Polysomnography System

    Mehran Baboli;Aditya Singh;Bruce Soll;Olga Boric-Lubecke

  • Benefits of Coherent Low-IF for Vital Signs Monitoring Using Doppler Radar

    Isar Mostafanezhad;Olga Boric-Lubecke

  • Is There Anybody in There?: Intelligent Radar Occupancy Sensors

    Ehsan Yavari;Chenyan Song;Victor Lubecke;Olga Boric-Lubecke

Frequent Co-Authors

Jenshan Lin
Jenshan Lin University of Florida
Danilo P. Mandic
Danilo P. Mandic Imperial College London
Gregory T. A. Kovacs
Gregory T. A. Kovacs SRI International
Changzhi Li
Changzhi Li Texas Tech University
Aly E. Fathy
Aly E. Fathy University of Tennessee at Knoxville

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Engineering and Technology in the USA opens doors to a range of interdisciplinary online degrees and career pathways. For professionals aiming to blend technical knowledge with management skills, pursuing the cheapest aacsb online mba programs can provide business expertise valued in engineering leadership roles.

Career flexibility is essential in today’s dynamic job market. Some graduates choose paths outside of core engineering, such as the legal sector. Earning credentials via aba approved online paralegal programs can help you apply your analytical skills in legal and regulatory environments.

For those interested in people management, the cheapest online master’s in human resources programs offer valuable expertise in recruiting and managing technical talent. Similarly, effective communication is critical in tech and engineering fields—an online master’s in communications helps you translate complex technical ideas into impactful messages.

Exploring these affordable online programs can help you expand your career opportunities beyond traditional engineering roles while maintaining your competitive edge.

Best Scientists Citing Olga Boric-Lubecke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles