World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
40
Citations
5218
World Ranking
8173
National Ranking
3499

Colleen A. Hanlon publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Colleen A. Hanlon sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 134 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Colleen A. Hanlon D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Colleen A. Hanlon sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Colleen A. Hanlon is affiliated with Wake Forest University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine, with notable contributions also in subfields such as Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Rehabilitation, and Epidemiology.

The scientist's studies cover a range of topics, including:

  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

Colleen A. Hanlon has published extensively in various venues. Their most frequent publication venues include:

  • Brain stimulation
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation.
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence

The scientist has collaborated notably with several researchers, including:

  • Daniel M. McCalley
  • Steven A. Kautz
  • Yiftach Roth
  • Michael R. Borich
  • Lara A. Boyd

Several recent papers illustrate the scope and focus of Colleen A. Hanlon's work:

  • "Guidelines for TMS/tES clinical services and research through the COVID-19 pandemic" (2020, Brain stimulation)
  • "A large, curated, open-source stroke neuroimaging dataset to improve lesion segmentation algorithms" (2022, Scientific Data)
  • "Concurrent TMS-fMRI for causal network perturbation and proof of target engagement" (2021, NeuroImage)
  • "Transcranial magnetic stimulation, deep brain stimulation, and other forms of neuromodulation for substance use disorders: Review of modalities and implications for treatment" (2020, Journal of the Neurological Sciences)
  • "A systematic review and meta-analysis of neuromodulation therapies for substance use disorders" (2023, Neuropsychopharmacology)

Best Publications

  • Transcranial electrical and magnetic stimulation (tES and TMS) for addiction medicine: A consensus paper on the present state of the science and the road ahead

    Hamed Ekhtiari;Hosna Tavakoli;Giovanni Addolorato;Chris Baeken

  • Optimizing real time fMRI neurofeedback for therapeutic discovery and development

    L.E. Stoeckel;L.E. Stoeckel;K.A. Garrison;S.S. Ghosh;P. Wighton

  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex reduces nicotine cue craving.

    Xingbao Li;Karen J. Hartwell;Karen J. Hartwell;Max Owens;Todd LeMatty

  • Noninvasive brain stimulation treatments for addiction and major depression.

    Katharine Dunlop;Katharine Dunlop;Colleen A. Hanlon;Jonathan Downar

  • What goes up, can come down: Novel brain stimulation paradigms may attenuate craving and craving-related neural circuitry in substance dependent individuals.

    Colleen A. Hanlon;Logan T. Dowdle;Christopher W. Austelle;William DeVries

  • Poor decision-making by chronic marijuana users is associated with decreased functional responsiveness to negative consequences

    Michael J. Wesley;Colleen A. Hanlon;Linda J. Porrino

  • Acute and persistent pain modulation of attention-related anterior cingulate fMRI activations

    Angela L.H. Buffington;Colleen A. Hanlon;Martin J. McKeown

  • Guidelines for TMS/tES clinical services and research through the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Marom Bikson;Colleen A Hanlon;Adam J Woods;Bernadette T Gillick

  • Visual cortex activation to drug cues: a meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging papers in addiction and substance abuse literature.

    Colleen A. Hanlon;Logan T. Dowdle;Thomas Naselaris;Melanie Canterberry

  • Left frontal pole theta burst stimulation decreases orbitofrontal and insula activity in cocaine users and alcohol users.

    Colleen A. Hanlon;Logan T. Dowdle;Brittany Correia;Oliver Mithoefer

  • Concurrent TMS-fMRI for causal network perturbation and proof of target engagement.

    Til Ole Bergmann;Rathiga Varatheeswaran;Colleen A. Hanlon;Kristoffer H. Madsen

  • Individualized real-time fMRI neurofeedback to attenuate craving in nicotine-dependent smokers

    Karen J Hartwell;Colleen A Hanlon;Xingbao Li;Jeffrey J Borckardt

  • Parallel studies of cocaine-related neural and cognitive impairment in humans and monkeys

    Thomas J.R Beveridge;Kathryn E Gill;Colleen A Hanlon;Linda J Porrino

  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation, deep brain stimulation, and other forms of neuromodulation for substance use disorders: Review of modalities and implications for treatment

    James J. Mahoney;Colleen A. Hanlon;Patrick J. Marshalek;Ali R. Rezai

  • Reduction of cue-induced craving through realtime neurofeedback in nicotine users: the role of region of interest selection and multiple visits.

    Colleen A. Hanlon;Karen J. Hartwell;Karen J. Hartwell;Melanie Canterberry;Xingbao Li

  • Executive control circuitry differentiates degree of success in weight loss following gastric-bypass surgery

    Rachel L. Goldman;Melanie Canterberry;Jeffrey J. Borckardt;Alok Madan

  • Low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex transiently increases cue-induced craving for methamphetamine: A preliminary study

    Xingbao Li;Robert J. Malcolm;Kristina Huebner;Colleen A. Hanlon

  • Sustained reduction of nicotine craving with real-time neurofeedback: exploring the role of severity of dependence.

    Melanie Canterberry;Colleen A. Hanlon;Karen J. Hartwell;Karen J. Hartwell;Xingbao Li

  • Naloxone-reversible modulation of pain circuitry by left prefrontal rTMS.

    Joseph J Taylor;Jeffrey J Borckardt;Melanie Canterberry;Xingbao Li

  • Determining the optimal pulse number for theta burst induced change in cortical excitability.

    Daniel M. McCalley;Daniel H. Lench;Jade D. Doolittle;Julia P. Imperatore

  • Elevated gray and white matter densities in cocaine abstainers compared to current users.

    Colleen A. Hanlon;Colleen A. Hanlon;Darin L. Dufault;Michael J. Wesley;Linda J. Porrino

  • Optimizing Real Time fMRI Neurofeedback for Therapeutic Discovery and Development

    Luke Stoeckel;Kathleen A. Garrison;Satrajit S Ghosh;Paul Wighton

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark S. George
Mark S. George Medical University of South Carolina
Xingbao Li
Xingbao Li Medical University of South Carolina
Jeffrey J. Borckardt
Jeffrey J. Borckardt Medical University of South Carolina
Linda J. Porrino
Linda J. Porrino Wake Forest University
Steven A. Kautz
Steven A. Kautz Medical University of South Carolina
George F. Wittenberg
George F. Wittenberg University of Pittsburgh
Lars T. Westlye
Lars T. Westlye University of Oslo
Bradley J. MacIntosh
Bradley J. MacIntosh Sunnybrook Health Science Centre
Kathleen T. Brady
Kathleen T. Brady Medical University of South Carolina
Amy Brodtmann
Amy Brodtmann Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in neuroscience, there are related online degrees and careers in counseling, therapy, and psychology that provide rewarding job opportunities. Many students explore cacrep accredited schools to begin a career in professional counseling, which can include clinically-focused master’s programs with an emphasis on mental health.

Another popular option is pursuing online clinical mental health counseling degrees. These programs often combine coursework in the science of brain function with practical therapeutic skills, preparing graduates for licensure and diverse roles in mental health care.

If you’re interested in working with families and couples, consider some of the cheapest online mft programs, which focus on marriage and family therapy. These flexible online programs can make it easier to balance study, work, and other responsibilities.

Finally, it’s important to consider affordability when choosing a path. You may be asking, how much does masters in psychology cost? Costs can vary significantly, so research tuition and available financial aid to find the right fit for your goals and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Colleen A. Hanlon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles