World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 49 5520 5128 3006 2726 102 47219

Dianne M. Tice publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Dianne M. Tice between 1983 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Dianne M. Tice published across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025, averaging 2.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2011. 5 of the 108 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2011. 1983: 1 publication 1984: 1 publication 1985: 6 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 3 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 4 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 3 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 4 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 2 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 2 publications
1983 2025

108 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Dianne M. Tice: publications per year, 1983 to 2025
Year Publications
1983 1
1984 1
1985 6
1986 2
1987 0
1988 1
1989 3
1990 3
1991 1
1992 1
1993 4
1994 2
1995 2
1996 1
1997 3
1998 4
1999 1
2000 4
2001 5
2002 0
2003 2
2004 1
2005 0
2006 4
2007 7
2008 4
2009 5
2010 2
2011 17
2012 2
2013 0
2014 0
2015 1
2016 0
2017 0
2018 5
2019 0
2020 1
2021 2
2022 2
2023 3
2024 3
2025 2
Total 108
Download as CSV

Dianne M. Tice publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dianne M. Tice sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 102 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 102
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Dianne M. Tice D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dianne M. Tice sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 49
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Dianne M. Tice is affiliated with Brigham Young University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the fields of psychology and social sciences. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with significant work in social psychology, education, cognitive neuroscience, applied psychology, and clinical psychology.

The scientist's recent publications include papers addressing themes related to higher education, behavioral health, mental health, and social psychology. Notable papers are:

  • Student belongingness in higher education: Lessons for Professors from the COVID-19 pandemic (2021) published in the Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice
  • Sense of belonging in higher education students: an Australian longitudinal study from 2013 to 2019 (2023) published in Studies in Higher Education
  • A Review of Multisite Replication Projects in Social Psychology: Is It Viable to Sustain Any Confidence in Social Psychology's Knowledge Base? (2022) published in Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • Self-control and limited willpower: Current status of ego depletion theory and research (2024) published in Current Opinion in Psychology
  • Taboos and Self-Censorship Among U.S. Psychology Professors (2024) published in Perspectives on Psychological Science

The main topics covered in their research include behavioral health and interventions, COVID-19 and mental health, communication in education and healthcare, mental health research topics, neural and behavioral psychology studies, higher education practices and engagement, and higher education research studies.

Publication venues frequently featuring their work encompass:

  • Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice
  • Studies in Higher Education
  • Current Opinion in Psychology

Collaborations have been an integral part of their career. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Roy F. Baumeister
  • Joseph Crawford
  • Kelly-Ann Allen
  • Brad J. Bushman
  • Alisa Percy

Their contributions span a range of subfields within psychology and social sciences, highlighting an interdisciplinary approach to research concerning human behavior, education, and mental health.

Best Publications

  • Ego depletion: is the active self a limited resource?

    Roy F. Baumeister;Ellen Bratslavsky;Mark Muraven;Dianne M. Tice

  • The Strength Model of Self-Control

    Roy F. Baumeister;Kathleen D. Vohs;Dianne M. Tice

  • Losing Control: How and Why People Fail at Self-Regulation

    Roy F. Baumeister;Todd F. Heatherton;Dianne M. Tice

  • Self-control as limited resource: regulatory depletion patterns

    Mark Muraven;Dianne M. Tice;Roy F. Baumeister

  • Making choices impairs subsequent self-control: A limited-resource account of decision making, self-regulation, and active initiative.

    Kathleen D. Vohs;Roy F. Baumeister;Brandon J. Schmeichel;Jean M. Twenge

  • Self-control relies on glucose as a limited energy source: willpower is more than a metaphor.

    Matthew T. Gailliot;Roy F. Baumeister;C. Nathan DeWall;Jon K. Maner

  • If You Can't Join Them, Beat Them: Effects of Social Exclusion on Aggressive Behavior

    Jean M. Twenge;Roy F. Baumeister;Dianne M. Tice;Tanja S. Stucke

  • Emotional distress regulation takes precedence over impulse control : If you feel bad, do it!

    Dianne M. Tice;Ellen Bratslavsky;Roy F. Baumeister

  • Self-Presentational Motivations and Personality Differences in Self-Esteem

    Roy F. Baumeister;Dianne M. Tice;Debra G. Hutton

  • Longitudinal Study of Procrastination, Performance, Stress, and Health: The Costs and Benefits of Dawdling

    Dianne M Tice;Roy F. Baumeister

  • Restoring the self: Positive affect helps improve self-regulation following ego depletion

    Dianne M. Tice;Roy F. Baumeister;Dikla Shmueli;Mark Muraven

  • Longitudinal Improvement of Self-Regulation Through Practice: Building Self-Control Strength Through Repeated Exercise

    Mark Muraven;Roy F. Baumeister;Dianne M. Tice

  • When ego threats lead to self-regulation failure: negative consequences of high self-esteem.

    Roy F. Baumeister;Todd F. Heatherton;Dianne M. Tice

  • If you can't join them, beat them: Effects of social exclusion on aggressive behavior.

    Unknown

  • Anxiety and Social Exclusion

    Roy F. Baumeister;Dianne M. Tice

  • Ego Depletion: A Resource Model of Volition, Self-Regulation, and Controlled Processing

    Roy F. Baumeister;Mark Muraven;Dianne M. Tice

  • Giving in to Feel Good: The Place of Emotion Regulation in the Context of General Self-Control

    Dianne M. Tice;Ellen Bratslavsky

  • Esteem protection or enhancement ? self-handicapping motives and attributions differ by trait self-esteem

    Dianne M. Tice

  • Acetaminophen Reduces Social Pain Behavioral and Neural Evidence

    C. Nathan DeWall;Geoff MacDonald;Gregory D. Webster;Carrie L. Masten

  • When modesty prevails: Differential favorability of self-presentation to friends and strangers.

    Dianne M. Tice;Jennifer L. Butler;Mark B. Muraven;Arlene M. Stillwell

  • Procrastination as a Self-Handicap for Men and Women: A Task-Avoidance Strategy in a Laboratory Setting

    Joseph R. Ferrari;Dianne M. Tice

Frequent Co-Authors

Roy F. Baumeister
Roy F. Baumeister University of Queensland
Joseph P. Forgas
Joseph P. Forgas University of New South Wales
Mark Muraven
Mark Muraven University at Albany, State University of New York
Jean M. Twenge
Jean M. Twenge San Diego State University
Kathleen D. Vohs
Kathleen D. Vohs University of Minnesota
Brandon J. Schmeichel
Brandon J. Schmeichel Texas A&M University
C. Nathan DeWall
C. Nathan DeWall University of Kentucky
Todd F. Heatherton
Todd F. Heatherton Dartmouth College
Ian McGregor
Ian McGregor University of Waterloo
E. Ashby Plant
E. Ashby Plant Florida State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology programs in the USA opens multiple educational and career pathways. Flexibility, affordability, and accessibility make these programs attractive to many students, especially working professionals or those with busy schedules.

Programs such as San Antonio psychology programs online and easiest online psychology programs in Texas are ideal for Texas residents seeking entry into the field without attending campus. Meanwhile, students in other regions might consider psychology programs online in the South or Wisconsin easiest psychology degrees online for options closer to home.

These online degrees can lead to rewarding careers in mental health, counseling, human resources, social work, and research. Many programs also serve as strong foundations for advanced degrees, such as a master’s in clinical psychology or counseling. When choosing an online program, consider factors like accreditation, specialization options, tuition cost, and support services to ensure you select the right pathway for your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Dianne M. Tice

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles