World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Klaus-Helmut Schmidt

Klaus-Helmut Schmidt

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
36
Citations
4750
World Ranking
9589
National Ranking
454

Klaus-Helmut Schmidt publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Klaus-Helmut Schmidt sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 94 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Klaus-Helmut Schmidt D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Klaus-Helmut Schmidt sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Klaus-Helmut Schmidt is affiliated with TU Dortmund University in Germany. Their academic focus and body of work are connected to this institution. The available data does not specify particular research topics, main fields of study, or subfields associated with their work.

No recent papers, frequent co-authors, or common publication venues have been recorded. Additionally, there are no book publications or awards listed in relation to their academic profile.

Due to the limited available information, the professional overview is primarily centered on the scientist's institutional affiliation, without detailed insight into specific research contributions or scholarly impact.

Best Publications

  • Age and gender diversity as determinants of performance and health in a public organization: the role of task complexity and group size.

    Jürgen Wegge;Carla Roth;Barbara Neubach;Klaus-Helmut Schmidt

  • 'Taking a sickie': Job satisfaction and job involvement as interactive predictors of absenteeism in a public organization

    Jürgen Wegge;Klaus-Helmut Schmidt;Carole Parkes;Rolf Van Dick;Rolf Van Dick

  • The impact of social context on the relationship between individual job satisfaction and absenteeism: The roles of different foci of job satisfaction and work-unit absenteeism.

    Stefan Diestel;Jürgen Wegge;Klaus-Helmut Schmidt

  • The Positive Relationship between Servant Leadership and Employees' Psychological Health: A Multi-Method Approach

    Wladislaw Rivkin;Stefan Diestel;Klaus-Helmut Schmidt

  • Sleep quality and self-control capacity as protective resources in the daily emotional labor process: results from two diary studies.

    Stefan Diestel;Wladislaw Rivkin;Klaus-Helmut Schmidt

  • Costs of simultaneous coping with emotional dissonance and self-control demands at work: results from two German samples.

    Stefan Diestel;Klaus-Helmut Schmidt

  • Motor behavior : programming, control, and acquisition

    H. Heuer;Uwe Kleinbeck;K.-H. Schmidt;John Annett

  • Self-control demands, cognitive control deficits, and burnout

    Klaus-Helmut Schmidt;Barbara Neubach;Herbert Heuer

  • Which daily experiences can foster well-being at work? A diary study on the interplay between flow experiences, affective commitment, and self-control demands.

    Wladislaw Rivkin;Stefan Diestel;Klaus-Helmut Schmidt

  • Organizational commitment: A further moderator in the relationship between work stress and strain?

    Klaus-Helmut Schmidt

  • What makes age diverse teams effective? Results from a six-year research program.

    J. Wegge;F. Jungmann;S. Liebermann;M. Shemla

  • Mediator and moderator effects of demands on self-control in the relationship between work load and indicators of job strain.

    Stefan Diestel;Klaus-Helmut Schmidt

  • Good ergonomics and team diversity reduce absenteeism and errors in car manufacturing

    Lars Fritzsche;Jürgen Wegge;Martin Schmauder;Matthias Kliegel

  • Self-control demands: A source of stress at work.

    Klaus-Helmut Schmidt;Barbara Neubach

  • Konsequenzen des demographischen Wandels für das Management von Humanressourcen

    Carla Roth;Jürgen Wegge;Klaus-Helmut Schmidt

  • Are emotional labour strategies by nurses associated with psychological costs? A cross-sectional survey.

    Klaus-Helmut Schmidt;Stefan Diestel

  • Affective commitment as a moderator of the adverse relationships between day-specific self-control demands and psychological well-being

    Wladislaw Rivkin;S. Diestel;K.-h. Schmidt

  • Lagged mediator effects of self‐control demands on psychological strain and absenteeism

    Stefan Diestel;Klaus-Helmut Schmidt

  • Psychometrische Eigenschaften und Validität einer deutschen Fassung des "Commitment"-Fragebogens von Allen und Meyer (1990).

    Klaus-Helmut Schmidt;Sven Hollmann;Daniel Sodenkamp

  • Differential effects of decision latitude and control on the job demands–strain relationship: A cross-sectional survey study among elderly care nursing staff

    Klaus-Helmut Schmidt;Stefan Diestel

Frequent Co-Authors

Rolf van Dick
Rolf van Dick Goethe University Frankfurt
Ruth Kanfer
Ruth Kanfer Georgia Institute of Technology
Matthias Kliegel
Matthias Kliegel University of Geneva
Veronika Brandstätter
Veronika Brandstätter University of Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees in the USA can open doors to a variety of rewarding career paths. One of the fastest-growing fields is marriage and family therapy (MFT), which offers the opportunity to help individuals, couples, and families overcome life’s challenges.

Before pursuing this career, it’s essential to understand local certification and education requirements, which can vary from city to city. For instance, those interested in working in Texas can review the Corpus Christi mft certification requirements as well as the Dallas mft education requirements. Students in other states might consider learning how to become an mft in Denver or researching the various mft requirements in Detroit.

Online psychology degrees can equip you with foundational knowledge and flexible skills for licensure. Whether you aim to work as an MFT or pursue other counseling roles, it’s vital to research state-specific pathways to licensure and choose accredited programs that align with your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Klaus-Helmut Schmidt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles