World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 49 5558 5163 3035 2753 109 15585

E. Ashby Plant publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by E. Ashby Plant between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. E. Ashby Plant published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 3.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2005. 5 of the 117 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2005. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 1 publication
1996 2025

117 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
E. Ashby Plant: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 1
1998 1
1999 3
2000 2
2001 1
2002 1
2003 2
2004 3
2005 9
2006 6
2007 5
2008 6
2009 6
2010 3
2011 6
2012 4
2013 4
2014 6
2015 5
2016 7
2017 2
2018 3
2019 7
2020 4
2021 7
2022 2
2023 5
2024 4
2025 1
Total 117
Download as CSV

E. Ashby Plant publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where E. Ashby Plant sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 109 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 109
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

E. Ashby Plant D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where E. Ashby Plant sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 49
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

E. Ashby Plant is affiliated with Florida State University in the United States and focuses research primarily in the fields of psychology and social sciences. Their work spans various subfields including sociology and political science, social psychology, clinical psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and gender studies.

The main topics addressed in Plant's research encompass social and intergroup psychology, cultural differences and values, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, suicide and self-harm studies, posttraumatic stress disorder research, racial and ethnic identity research, and death anxiety and social exclusion.

Plant has contributed to several peer-reviewed publications, including journal articles published in venues such as Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Social Psychological and Personality Science, Military Behavioral Health, PsycTESTS Dataset, and Personality and Individual Differences.

Recent published papers include:

  • What factors underlie attitudes regarding protective mask use during the COVID-19 pandemic?, 2021, Personality and Individual Differences
  • Pathogen threat and intergroup prejudice using the minimal group paradigm: Evidence from a registered report, 2022, Evolution and Human Behavior
  • Childhood illness as an antecedent of perceived vulnerability to disease, 2020, Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences
  • Capturing Fluctuations in Pathogen Avoidance: the Situational Pathogen Avoidance Scale, 2020, Evolutionary Psychological Science
  • "They should have followed the rules": Trade-offs Between Fairness and Authority Values Predict Judgments of Social Justice Protests, 2020, Social Psychological and Personality Science

Frequent coauthors in Plant's research include:

  • Jon K. Maner
  • Stephanie R. Mallinas
  • Anastasia Makhanova
  • Jennifer LaCosse
  • Douglas L. Kievit

The body of research conducted by Plant often explores the psychological mechanisms underlying intergroup attitudes, pathogen avoidance, social justice perceptions, and health-related behaviors. Their contributions engage with both theoretical and applied aspects of social and clinical psychology.

Best Publications

  • Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice

    E. Ashby Plant;Patricia G. Devine

  • Self-control relies on glucose as a limited energy source: willpower is more than a metaphor.

    Matthew T. Gailliot;Roy F. Baumeister;C. Nathan DeWall;Jon K. Maner

  • The regulation of explicit and implicit race bias: the role of motivations to respond without prejudice.

    Patricia G. Devine;E. Ashby Plant;David M. Amodio;Eddie Harmon-Jones

  • The Antecedents and Implications of Interracial Anxiety

    E. Ashby Plant;Patricia G. Devine

  • THE GENDER STEREOTYPING OF EMOTIONS

    E. Ashby Plant;Janet Shibley Hyde;Dacher Keltner;Patricia G. Devine

  • Why study time does not predict grade point average across college students: Implications of deliberate practice for academic performance

    E. Ashby Plant;K. Anders Ericsson;Len Hill;Kia Asberg

  • The Consequences of Race for Police Officers' Responses to Criminal Suspects

    E. Ashby Plant;B. Michelle Peruche

  • Increasing Self-Regulatory Strength Can Reduce the Depleting Effect of Suppressing Stereotypes

    Matthew T. Gailliot;E. Ashby Plant;David A. Butz;Roy F. Baumeister

  • Responses to Interracial Interactions Over Time

    E. Ashby Plant

  • Racial and Ethnic Differences in Depression: The Roles of Social Support and Meeting Basic Needs.

    E. Ashby Plant;Natalie Sachs-Ericsson

  • Eliminating automatic racial bias: Making race non-diagnostic for responses to criminal suspects

    E. Ashby Plant;B. Michelle Peruche;David A. Butz

  • Upward spirals of positive emotion and coping: Replication, extension, and initial exploration of neurochemical substrates.

    Andrea B. Burns;Jessica S. Brown;Natalie Sachs-Ericsson;E. Ashby Plant

  • Mortality Salience Increases Adherence to Salient Norms and Values

    Matthew T. Gailliot;Tyler F. Stillman;Brandon J. Schmeichel;Jon K. Maner

  • The active control of prejudice: Unpacking the intentions guiding control efforts.

    E. Ashby Plant;Patricia G. Devine

  • Childhood Sexual and Physical Abuse and the 1-Year Prevalence of Medical Problems in the National Comorbidity Survey.

    Natalie J. Sachs-Ericsson;D. Blazer;E. Ashby Plant;Bruce A. Arnow

  • Responses to other-imposed pro-black pressure: Acceptance or backlash?

    E.Ashby Plant;Patricia G. Devine

  • The Problem of “Us” Versus “Them” and AIDS Stigma:

    Patricia G. Devine;E. Ashby Plant;Kristen Harrison

  • Changing middle-school students' attitudes and performance regarding engineering with computer-based social models

    E. Ashby Plant;Amy L. Baylor;Celeste E. Doerr;Rinat B. Rosenberg-Kima

  • The Causes and Consequences of an Avoidance-Focus for Interracial Interactions

    E. Ashby Plant;David A. Butz

  • Internal and External Motivation to Respond Without Sexism

    Suzanne C. Klonis;E. Ashby Plant;Patricia G. Devine

  • Sexuality during pregnancy and the year postpartum.

    Janet Shibley Hyde;John D. DeLamater;E. Ashby Plant;Janis M. Byrd

Frequent Co-Authors

Patricia G. Devine
Patricia G. Devine University of Wisconsin–Madison
Jon K. Maner
Jon K. Maner Florida State University
Natalie Sachs-Ericsson
Natalie Sachs-Ericsson Florida State University
Peter M. Gutierrez
Peter M. Gutierrez Florida State University
Thomas E. Joiner
Thomas E. Joiner Florida State University
Amy L. Baylor
Amy L. Baylor National Science Foundation
Janet Shibley Hyde
Janet Shibley Hyde University of Wisconsin–Madison
Roy F. Baumeister
Roy F. Baumeister University of Queensland
Katherine Anne Comtois
Katherine Anne Comtois University of Washington
Brandon J. Schmeichel
Brandon J. Schmeichel Texas A&M University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens doors to a variety of rewarding careers in mental health. One popular path is becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), which involves specialized training and meeting state-specific licensure requirements.

If you’re interested in how to become a marriage and family therapist in San Antonio, you'll find information on educational prerequisites, clinical experience, and state licensing. Similar requirements apply if you want to learn more about San Diego mft education requirements, with details on coursework and supervised practice.

Different regions may have unique pathways, so researching how to meet requirements is essential. For example, you can review the steps for how to become a marriage and family therapist in San Francisco and see what’s required in the Bay Area. Similarly, the process for how to become a marriage and family therapist in San Jose offers insights tailored to that community.

Whether you choose counseling, therapy, or another psychology-related career, online degrees offer flexibility as you prepare for diverse licensure and certification demands across the USA.

Best Scientists Citing E. Ashby Plant

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles