World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Natalie Sachs-Ericsson

Natalie Sachs-Ericsson

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
49
Citations
8820
World Ranking
5714
National Ranking
3101

Natalie Sachs-Ericsson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Natalie Sachs-Ericsson sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 120 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Natalie Sachs-Ericsson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Natalie Sachs-Ericsson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Natalie Sachs-Ericsson is affiliated with Florida State University in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on psychology, with a significant emphasis on clinical psychology. Other fields of study include health, social psychology, neuropsychology and physiological psychology, and public health, environmental and occupational health.

Their work covers several main topics, including:

  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies

Recent papers by Sachs-Ericsson explore various aspects of mental health and aging. These include:

  • "The Interpersonal and Psychological Impacts of COVID-19 on Risk for Late-Life Suicide," 2020, published in The Gerontologist
  • "Dog Walking and the Social Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Loneliness in Older Adults," 2021, published in Animals
  • "Cognitive reappraisal, emotional suppression, and depressive and anxiety symptoms in later life: The moderating role of gender," 2021, published in Aging & Mental Health
  • "A pilot randomized clinical trial of a lethal means safety intervention for young adults with firearm familiarity at risk for suicide," 2020, published in Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
  • "Emotion regulation and the late positive potential (LPP) in older adults," 2022, published in International Journal of Psychophysiology

Common publication venues for Sachs-Ericsson include:

  • Innovation in Aging
  • Aging & Mental Health
  • The Gerontologist
  • Animals
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Frequent coauthors in their research collaborations are:

  • Dawn Carr
  • Julia Sheffler
  • Thomas E. Joiner
  • Melissa Meynadasy
  • Ian H. Stanley

Sachs-Ericsson's research contributions span interdisciplinary topics related to aging, mental health, and social influences during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a focus on emotional regulation, suicide risk, and psychosocial well-being in later life. Their work integrates clinical psychology approaches with public health concerns to address health disparities and emotional outcomes across the lifespan.

Best Publications

  • Family-focused treatment of bipolar disorder: 1-year effects of a psychoeducational program in conjunction with pharmacotherapy.

    David J Miklowitz;David J Miklowitz;Teresa L Simoneau;Elizabeth L George;Jeffrey A Richards

  • Childhood physical and sexual abuse and lifetime number of suicide attempts: A persistent and theoretically important relationship

    Thomas E. Joiner;Natalie J. Sachs-Ericsson;LaRicka R. Wingate;Jessica S. Brown

  • Examining the unique relationships between anxiety disorders and childhood physical and sexual abuse in the National Comorbidity Survey-Replication

    Jesse R. Cougle;Kiara R. Timpano;Natalie Sachs-Ericsson;Meghan E. Keough

  • Parental verbal abuse and the mediating role of self-criticism in adult internalizing disorders.

    Natalie Sachs-Ericsson;Edelyn Verona;Thomas E. Joiner;Kristopher J. Preacher

  • Anxiety disorders and suicidality in the National Comorbidity Survey-Replication.

    Jesse R. Cougle;Meghan E. Keough;Christina J. Riccardi;Natalie Sachs-Ericsson

  • Suicide attempts associated with externalizing psychopathology in an epidemiological sample.

    Edelyn Verona;Natalie Sachs-Ericsson;Thomas E. Joiner

  • Racial and Ethnic Differences in Depression: The Roles of Social Support and Meeting Basic Needs.

    E. Ashby Plant;Natalie Sachs-Ericsson

  • Childhood abuse, chronic pain, and depression in the National Comorbidity Survey

    Natalie Sachs-Ericsson;Kathleen A. Kendall-Tackett;Annette Hernandez

  • Upward spirals of positive emotion and coping: Replication, extension, and initial exploration of neurochemical substrates.

    Andrea B. Burns;Jessica S. Brown;Natalie Sachs-Ericsson;E. Ashby Plant

  • Childhood Sexual and Physical Abuse and the 1-Year Prevalence of Medical Problems in the National Comorbidity Survey.

    Natalie J. Sachs-Ericsson;D. Blazer;E. Ashby Plant;Bruce A. Arnow

  • The new DSM-5 diagnosis of mild neurocognitive disorder and its relation to research in mild cognitive impairment

    Natalie Sachs-Ericsson;Dan G Blazer

  • A review of childhood abuse, health, and pain-related problems: the role of psychiatric disorders and current life stress.

    Natalie Sachs-Ericsson;Kiara R. Cromer;Annette Hernandez;Kathleen A. Kendall-Tackett

  • Gender, Social Roles, and Mental Health: An Epidemiological Perspective

    Natalie Sachs-Ericsson;James A. Ciarlo

  • When Emotional Pain Becomes Physical: Adverse Childhood Experiences, Pain, and the Role of Mood and Anxiety Disorders

    Natalie J. Sachs-Ericsson;Julia L. Sheffler;Ian H. Stanley;Jennifer R. Piazza

  • Body mass index and depressive symptoms in older adults: the moderating roles of race, sex, and socioeconomic status.

    Natalie Sachs-Ericsson;Andrea B. Burns;Kathryn H. Gordon;Lisa A. Eckel

  • Benefits of assistance dogs: A review.

    Natalie Sachs-Ericsson;Nancy K. Hansen;Shirley Fitzgerald

  • Religious Attendance Reduces Cognitive Decline Among Older Women With High Levels of Depressive Symptoms

    Elizabeth A. Corsentino;Nicole Collins;Natalie Sachs-Ericsson;Dan G. Blazer

  • Implications of comorbid alcohol dependence among individuals with social anxiety disorder.

    Julia D. Buckner;Kiara R. Timpano;Michael J. Zvolensky;Natalie Sachs-Ericsson

  • The influence of depression on cognitive decline in community-dwelling elderly persons.

    Natalie Sachs-Ericsson;Thomas Joiner;E. Ashby Plant;Dan G. Blazer

  • In my end is my beginning: developmental trajectories of adverse childhood experiences to late-life suicide

    Natalie J Sachs-Ericsson;Nicole C Rushing;Ian H Stanley;Julia Sheffler

  • Lifetime associations between cannabis, use, abuse, and dependence and panic attacks in a representative sample

    Michael J. Zvolensky;Amit Bernstein;Natalie Sachs-Ericsson;Norman B. Schmidt

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas E. Joiner
Thomas E. Joiner Florida State University
Dan G. Blazer
Dan G. Blazer Duke University
Norman B. Schmidt
Norman B. Schmidt Florida State University
Ian H. Stanley
Ian H. Stanley Florida State University
Michael J. Zvolensky
Michael J. Zvolensky University of Houston
David C. Steffens
David C. Steffens University of Connecticut
Edward A. Selby
Edward A. Selby Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
E. Ashby Plant
E. Ashby Plant Florida State University
Jesse R. Cougle
Jesse R. Cougle Florida State University
Kristopher J. Preacher
Kristopher J. Preacher Vanderbilt University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens up a variety of online degrees and rewarding career paths beyond traditional counseling roles. Many students pursue specialized graduate programs, including Marriage and Family Therapy (MFT), clinical psychology, or school counseling, which often allow for flexible online study options. Online platforms make it easier to balance coursework around work and family commitments while gaining the skills required for licensure and professional growth.

Those interested in becoming a licensed therapist should understand the local requirements and opportunities. You can learn more about how to become a marriage and family therapist in Gilbert, how to become a marriage and family therapist in Glendale, and how to become a marriage and family therapist in Greensboro for insights into regional educational paths and licensing steps. Additionally, if you’re looking to practice in Nevada, discover how to become an mft in Henderson for specific state guidelines.

Whether your interest lies in therapy, research, or community support, online degrees and clear career pathways make it easier than ever to launch a successful psychology career tailored to your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Natalie Sachs-Ericsson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles