World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 55 4313 3985 208 199 127 18832

David M. Amodio publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David M. Amodio between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David M. Amodio published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 6.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2022. 17 of the 150 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2022. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 10 publications
2002 2025

150 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David M. Amodio: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 1
2004 2
2005 2
2006 3
2007 6
2008 4
2009 7
2010 11
2011 9
2012 7
2013 8
2014 10
2015 8
2016 2
2017 10
2018 9
2019 9
2020 4
2021 5
2022 12
2023 3
2024 7
2025 10
Total 150
Download as CSV

David M. Amodio publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. Amodio sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 127 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 127
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

David M. Amodio D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. Amodio sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 55
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

David M. Amodio is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands and conducts research primarily in the social sciences and psychology. Their work spans multiple subfields including sociology and political science, cognitive neuroscience, social psychology, safety research, and clinical psychology.

Their research topics cover a range of areas within social and intergroup psychology, cultural differences and values, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, experimental behavioral economics studies, as well as COVID-19 related mental health and epidemiological research. Evolutionary psychology and human behavior also feature among their main topics of study.

Recent publications by David M. Amodio include:

  • National identity predicts public health support during a global pandemic, 2022, Nature Communications
  • A computational reward learning account of social media engagement, 2021, Nature Communications
  • The Social Neuroscience of Prejudice, 2020, Annual Review of Psychology
  • Propagation of societal gender inequality by internet search algorithms, 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Reinforcement learning in social interaction: The distinguishing role of trait inference, 2020, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

David M. Amodio has frequently published in the following venues:

  • Nature Communications
  • Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Motivation Science
  • Annual Review of Psychology

Frequent co-authors in their research include Panagiotis Mitkidis, Petra C. Schmid, André Krouwel, Madalina Vlasceanu, and David Schultner.

Best Publications

  • Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition.

    David M. Amodio;Chris D. Frith

  • The regulation of explicit and implicit race bias: the role of motivations to respond without prejudice.

    Patricia G. Devine;E. Ashby Plant;David M. Amodio;Eddie Harmon-Jones

  • Stereotyping and evaluation in implicit race bias: evidence for independent constructs and unique effects on behavior

    David M. Amodio;Patricia G. Devine

  • Neurocognitive correlates of liberalism and conservatism.

    David M Amodio;John T Jost;Sarah L Master;Cindy M Yee

  • Neurocognitive components of the behavioral inhibition and activation systems: implications for theories of self-regulation

    David M. Amodio;Sarah L. Master;Cindy M. Yee;Shelley E. Taylor

  • Political ideology as motivated social cognition: Behavioral and neuroscientific evidence.

    John T. Jost;David M. Amodio

  • The neuroscience of prejudice and stereotyping

    David M. Amodio

  • Neural Signals for the Detection of Unintentional Race Bias

    David M. Amodio;Eddie Harmon-Jones;Patricia G. Devine;John J. Curtin

  • Individual differences in the activation and control of affective race bias as assessed by startle eyeblink response and self-report.

    David M. Amodio;Eddie Harmon-Jones;Patricia G. Devine

  • A Dynamic Model of Guilt: Implications for Motivation and Self-Regulation in the Context of Prejudice

    David M. Amodio;Patricia G. Devine;Eddie Harmon-Jones

  • Chapter 3 Action‐Based Model of Dissonance: A Review, Integration, and Expansion of Conceptions of Cognitive Conflict

    Eddie Harmon‐Jones;David M. Amodio;Cindy Harmon‐Jones

  • Individual differences in the regulation of intergroup bias: the role of conflict monitoring and neural signals for control.

    David M. Amodio;Patricia G. Devine;Eddie Harmon-Jones

  • Economic scarcity alters the perception of race.

    Amy R. Krosch;David M. Amodio

  • Reducing the Expression of Implicit Stereotypes: Reflexive Control Through Implementation Intentions

    Saaid A. Mendoza;Peter M. Gollwitzer;David M. Amodio

  • National identity predicts public health support during a global pandemic

    Unknown

  • Attitudes Toward Emotions

    Eddie Harmon-Jones;Cindy Harmon-Jones;David M. Amodio;Philip A. Gable

  • Implicit regulatory focus associated with asymmetrical frontal cortical activity.

    David M Amodio;James Y Shah;Jonathan Sigelman;Paige C Brazy

  • Political Neuroscience: The Beginning of a Beautiful Friendship

    John T. Jost;H. Hannah Nam;David M. Amodio;Jay J. Van Bavel

  • The social neuroscience of intergroup relations

    David M. Amodio

  • Tracking the dynamics of the social brain: ERP approaches for social cognitive and affective neuroscience

    David M. Amodio;Bruce D. Bartholow;Tiffany A. Ito

  • Alternative mechanisms for regulating racial responses according to internal vs external cues

    David M. Amodio;Jennifer T. Kubota;Eddie Harmon-Jones;Patricia G. Devine

Frequent Co-Authors

Eddie Harmon-Jones
Eddie Harmon-Jones University of New South Wales
Patricia G. Devine
Patricia G. Devine University of Wisconsin–Madison
Cindy Harmon-Jones
Cindy Harmon-Jones Western Sydney University
John T. Jost
John T. Jost New York University
Chris D. Frith
Chris D. Frith University College London
Tom R. Tyler
Tom R. Tyler Yale University
Diane N. Ruble
Diane N. Ruble New York University
Óscar F. Gonçalves
Óscar F. Gonçalves University of Coimbra
Philippe N. Tobler
Philippe N. Tobler University of Zurich
Shelley E. Taylor
Shelley E. Taylor University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA can open doors to a range of related online degrees and career pathways, such as social work, counseling, and behavioral health. Many students use a psychology background as a foundation for advanced study or licensure in these fields, particularly social work—one of the most in-demand professions for helping communities.

Social work requirements differ by state. For example, those interested in working in Rhode Island can learn more about Rhode Island social work education requirements. Similarly, if you are considering a career in South Carolina, it’s important to understand South Carolina social work education requirements before enrolling in a relevant program.

States like South Dakota also have specific requirements to be a social worker in South Dakota, including degree levels and required examinations. Likewise, those pursuing social work in Tennessee should review the Tennessee social work license requirements to plan their educational journey effectively.

Carefully researching each state’s regulations will help you choose the right online psychology or social work degree, and ensure a smooth transition into your desired career path.

Best Scientists Citing David M. Amodio

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles