World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jeffrey S. Rosenschein

Jeffrey S. Rosenschein

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
56
Citations
13837
World Ranking
4038
National Ranking
62

Jeffrey S. Rosenschein publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey S. Rosenschein sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 222 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jeffrey S. Rosenschein D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey S. Rosenschein sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - ACM Fellow For contributions to multi-agent systems, in particular, the use of game theory in multi-agent systems
  • 2009 - Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) For significant contributions to multiagent systems, automated negotiation, voting mechanisms, and to bringing game-theoretic mechanism design into computer science.

Overview

Jeffrey S. Rosenschein is affiliated with the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in Israel. Their research primarily falls within the field of Computer Science, with a significant focus on several subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Signal Processing, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

Their work spans multiple topics, notably Music and Audio Processing, Music Technology and Sound Studies, Misinformation and Its Impacts, Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment, Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation, Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research, and Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization.

Frequent co-authors of Jeffrey S. Rosenschein include N. Alon, Lion Schulz, Peter Dayan, Shahaf Bassan, and Yossi Adi.

Their recent published papers include:

  • Minimizing Node Expansions in Bidirectional Search with Consistent Heuristics, 2021, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Combinatorial Search
  • A (Dis-)information Theory of Revealed and Unrevealed Preferences: Emerging Deception and Skepticism via Theory of Mind, 2023, Open Mind
  • Unsupervised Symbolic Music Segmentation using Ensemble Temporal Prediction Errors, 2022, Interspeech 2022
  • Reaching consensus under a deadline, 2021, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
  • Understanding Mechanism Design-Part 2 of 3: The Vickrey-Clarke-Groves Mechanism, 2021, IEEE Intelligent Systems

Jeffrey S. Rosenschein has published frequently in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Open Mind, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Combinatorial Search, Interspeech 2022, and Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

The scientist has received the ACM Fellow award in 2019 for contributions to multi-agent systems, specifically the use of game theory within that domain. Additionally, they were recognized as a Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) in 2009 for significant contributions related to multiagent systems, automated negotiation, voting mechanisms, and incorporating game-theoretic mechanism design into computer science.

Best Publications

  • Rules of encounter: designing conventions for automated negotiation among computers

    Jeffrey S. Rosenschein;Gilad Zlotkin

  • Deals among rational agents

    Jeffrey S. Rosenschein;Michael R. Genesereth

  • Cooperation without communication

    Michael R. Genesereth;Matthew L. Ginsberg;Jeffrey S. Rosenschein

  • Junta distributions and the average-case complexity of manipulating elections

    Ariel D. Procaccia;Jeffrey S. Rosenschein

  • Ad hoc autonomous agent teams: collaboration without pre-coordination

    Peter Stone;Gal A. Kaminka;Sarit Kraus;Jeffrey S. Rosenschein

  • Negotiation and task sharing among autonomous agents in cooperative domains

    Gilad Zlotkin;Jeffrey S. Rosenschein

  • A specification of the Agent Reputation and Trust (ART) testbed: experimentation and competition for trust in agent societies

    Karen K. Fullam;Tomas B. Klos;Guillaume Muller;Jordi Sabater

  • Coalition, Cryptography, and Stability: Mechanisms for Coalition Formation in Task Oriented Domains

    Gilad Zlotkin;Jeffrey S. Rosenschein

  • Bitcoin Mining Pools: A Cooperative Game Theoretic Analysis

    Yoad Lewenberg;Yoram Bachrach;Yonatan Sompolinsky;Aviv Zohar

  • Designing conventions for automated negotiation

    Jeffrey S. Rosenschein;Gilad Zlotkin

  • Distributed Problem Solving and Multi-Agent Systems: Comparisons and Examples*

    Edmund H. Durfee;Jeffrey S. Rosenschein

  • The Clarke tax as a consensus mechanism among automated agents

    Eithan Ephrati;Jeffrey S. Rosenschein

  • Rational interaction: cooperation among intelligent agents

    Jeffrey Solomon Rosenschein

  • On the complexity of achieving proportional representation

    Ariel D. Procaccia;Jeffrey S. Rosenschein;Aviv Zohar

  • Research directions for service-oriented multiagent systems

    M.N. Huhns;M.P. Singh;M. Burstein;K. Decker

  • Cooperation and conflict resolution via negotiation among autonomous agents in noncooperative domains

    G. Zlotkin;J.S. Rosenschein

  • The distortion of cardinal preferences in voting

    Ariel D. Procaccia;Jeffrey S. Rosenschein

  • Mechanisms for automated negotiation in state oriented domains

    Gilad Zlotkin;Jeffrey S. Rosenschein

  • Multi-agent planning as a dynamic search for social consensus

    Eithan Ephrati;Jeffrey S. Rosenschein

  • Divide and conquer in multi-agent planning

    Eithan Ephrati;Jeffrey S. Rosenschein

  • Gossip-based aggregation of trust in decentralized reputation systems

    Ariel D. Procaccia;Yoram Bachrach;Jeffrey S. Rosenschein

Frequent Co-Authors

Yoram Bachrach
Yoram Bachrach DeepMind (United Kingdom)
Ariel D. Procaccia
Ariel D. Procaccia Harvard University
Sarit Kraus
Sarit Kraus Bar-Ilan University
Michael R. Genesereth
Michael R. Genesereth Stanford University
Gal A. Kaminka
Gal A. Kaminka Bar-Ilan University
Ariel Felner
Ariel Felner Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Michael Wooldridge
Michael Wooldridge University of Oxford
Maria Gini
Maria Gini University of Minnesota
Toby Walsh
Toby Walsh University of New South Wales
Edith Elkind
Edith Elkind University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to a wide range of professions and further academic opportunities. Many students consider what complements their studies or how to continue their education online. For instance, students often research the most useful degrees that can boost career potential alongside or after a computer science major.

For those interested in advancing quickly, some opt for the easiest masters degree to get online, which offers a quicker and more flexible route to career advancement. Such programs are ideal for those who want to balance work and study.

If you’re considering doctoral studies but are concerned about cost, exploring the cheapest online PhD programs can help you find budget-friendly options without compromising academic quality. Alternatively, aspiring educators might be interested in 2 year ed d programs online for a fast track to leadership roles in academia or administration.

With so many flexible and affordable online degrees now available, there’s a career progression path suited to every ambition within the field of computer science.

Best Scientists Citing Jeffrey S. Rosenschein

Trending Scientists