World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michaéla C. Schippers

Michaéla C. Schippers

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 34 10010 9371 442 428 86 10797

Michaéla C. Schippers publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michaéla C. Schippers between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michaéla C. Schippers published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 4.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2020. 10 of the 103 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2020. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 4 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 7 publications
2001 2025

103 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michaéla C. Schippers: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 1
2003 1
2004 1
2005 3
2006 2
2007 4
2008 2
2009 4
2010 1
2011 4
2012 4
2013 3
2014 5
2015 6
2016 2
2017 4
2018 8
2019 5
2020 13
2021 11
2022 3
2023 5
2024 3
2025 7
Total 103
Download as CSV

Michaéla C. Schippers publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michaéla C. Schippers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 86 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 86
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Michaéla C. Schippers D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michaéla C. Schippers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 34
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Michaéla C. Schippers is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands, with a primary research focus in the field of Psychology. Their work spans multiple subfields including Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

Their publication record includes significant contributions to the understanding of psychological well-being, motivation, and the impact of external crises on mental health. Among their recent papers are the following:

  • "For the Greater Good? The Devastating Ripple Effects of the Covid-19 Crisis" (2020, Frontiers in Psychology)
  • "Optimizing Decision-Making Processes in Times of COVID-19" (2021, Data Archiving and Networked Services [DANS])

They have also been connected to collaborative research on topics such as mental health and academic performance, illustrated by studies like "Optimizing Students' Mental Health and Academic Performance: AI-Enhanced Life Crafting" (2020, Frontiers in Psychology) and "From Shattered Goals to Meaning in Life: Life Crafting in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic" (2020, Frontiers in Psychology).

Frequent co-authors in their body of work include Elisabeth M. de Jong, John P. A. Ioannidis, Ad Scheepers, Izaak Dekker, and Job Hudig. The collaboration with these researchers suggests interdisciplinary approaches to the study of psychological phenomena and societal impacts.

They have published extensively in key academic venues, with multiple studies featured in:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • European Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • Frontiers in Public Health

Their primary research topics include:

  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation

This research contribution reflects a broad engagement with psychological processes underpinned by both theoretical and applied perspectives, particularly in addressing mental health challenges during global crises like the COVID-19 pandemic.

Best Publications

  • Work Group Diversity

    Daan van Knippenberg;Michaéla C. Schippers

  • Transformational and transactional leadership and innovative behavior : The moderating role of psychological empowerment

    Anne Nederveen Pieterse;Daan van Knippenberg;Michaéla Schippers;Daan Stam

  • Diversity and team outcomes: the moderating effects of outcome interdependence and group longevity and the mediating effect of reflexivity

    Michaéla C. Schippers;Deanne N. Den Hartog;Paul L. Koopman;Janique A. Wienk

  • Team Reflexivity and Innovation The Moderating Role of Team Context

    Michaéla C. Schippers;Michael A. West;Jeremy F. Dawson

  • Network churn: The effects of self-monitoring personality on brokerage dynamics

    Zuzana Sasovova;Ajay Mehra;Stephen P. Borgatti;Michaéla C. Schippers

  • Reflexivity in Teams: A Measure and Correlates

    Michaéla C. Schippers;Deanne N. Den Hartog;Paul L. Koopman

  • The role of transformational leadership in enhancing team reflexivity

    Michaéla C. Schippers;Deanne N. Den Hartog;Paul L. Koopman;Daan van Knippenberg

  • Team Reflexivity as an Antidote to Team Information-Processing Failures

    Michaéla C. Schippers;Amy C. Edmondson;Michael A. West

  • To reflect or not to reflect: Prior team performance as a boundary condition of the effects of reflexivity on learning and final team performance

    Michaéla C. Schippers;Astrid C. Homan;Daan van Knippenberg

  • Reflexivity in Teams: A Review and New Perspectives

    Udo Konradt;Kai-Philip Otte;Michaéla C Schippers;Corinna Steenfatt

  • Recent developments in reflexivity research: A review

    Pascale S. Widmer;Michaéla C. Schippers;Michael A. West

  • Life Crafting as a Way to Find Purpose and Meaning in Life

    Michaéla C. Schippers;Niklas Ziegler

  • Social Loafing Tendencies and Team Performance: The Compensating Effect of Agreeableness and Conscientiousness

    Michaéla C. Schippers

  • Who volunteers in psychology experiments? An empirical review of prosocial motivation in volunteering

    Paul A.M. Van Lange;Michaéla Schippers;Daniel Balliet

  • Digital game elements, user experience and learning: A conceptual framework

    Andreas Alexiou;Michaéla C. Schippers

  • Optimizing Students' Mental Health and Academic Performance: AI-Enhanced Life Crafting.

    Izaak Dekker;Izaak Dekker;Elisabeth M. De Jong;Michaéla C. Schippers;Monique De Bruijn-Smolders;Monique De Bruijn-Smolders

  • Effects of guided reflexivity and team feedback on team performance improvement: The role of team regulatory processes and cognitive emergent states

    Udo Konradt;Michaéla C. Schippers;Yvonne Garbers;Corinna Steenfatt

  • A scalable goal-setting intervention closes both the gender and ethnic minority achievement gap

    Michaéla C Schippers;Ad W A Scheepers;Jordan B Peterson

  • Co-worker exclusion and employee outcomes: An investigation of the moderating roles of perceived organizational and social support

    Kristin L. Scott;Thomas J. Zagenczyk;Michaéla Schippers;Russell L. Purvis

  • From Shattered Goals to Meaning in Life: Life Crafting in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic

    Elisabeth M de Jong;Niklas Ziegler;Michaéla C Schippers

  • Energy management of people in organizations: A review and research agenda.

    Michaéla C. Schippers;René Hogenes

Frequent Co-Authors

Deanne N. Den Hartog
Deanne N. Den Hartog University of Amsterdam
Daan van Knippenberg
Daan van Knippenberg Rice University
Michael West
Michael West Duke University
Paul A. M. Van Lange
Paul A. M. Van Lange Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Astrid C. Homan
Astrid C. Homan University of Amsterdam
Amy C. Edmondson
Amy C. Edmondson Harvard University
Jeremy Dawson
Jeremy Dawson University of Sheffield
Michelle Duffy
Michelle Duffy University of Newcastle Australia
Arnold B. Bakker
Arnold B. Bakker Erasmus University Rotterdam
Daniel Balliet
Daniel Balliet Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology as a field of study in the USA provides a wide range of flexible online degree options. Many universities now offer accredited, affordable programs allowing students to balance their education with work and personal commitments. Cost is a major consideration for prospective students, and it pays to research programs that fit your budget without sacrificing quality or accreditation.

For students looking for budget-friendly options, there are affordable psychology programs in Missouri that are well-suited to those seeking cost-effective degrees. Similarly, students in the Southeast can explore the cheapest psychology programs in North Carolina, ideal for both in-state and out-of-state learners.

If you are based in the Northeast, there are options for the most affordable psychology degree programs in New York City as well as the cheapest psychology degrees in New Jersey.

Graduates of these programs are equipped for various career pathways, including counseling, research, human resources, and further study in clinical or forensic psychology. Online degrees also help professionals advance their skills and open doors to new job opportunities in mental health and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Michaéla C. Schippers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles