World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
12199
World Ranking
8061
National Ranking
364

Astrid C. Homan publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Astrid C. Homan sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 117 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Astrid C. Homan D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Astrid C. Homan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Astrid C. Homan is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the social sciences and psychology, with a focus on subfields including sociology and political science, gender studies, social psychology, clinical psychology, and organizational behavior and human resource management.

The research topics covered by Astrid C. Homan's publications include gender diversity and inequality, job satisfaction and organizational behavior, social and intergroup psychology, team dynamics and performance, conflict management and negotiation, cultural differences and values, and personality traits and psychology.

Recent papers by Astrid C. Homan highlight contributions to the understanding of leadership and diversity as well as norm-related social dynamics. Notable publications include:

  • Leading diversity: Towards a theory of functional leadership in diverse teams (2020), published in the Journal of Applied Psychology
  • How norm violators rise and fall in the eyes of others: The role of sanctions (2021), published in PLoS ONE
  • An intersectional lens on young leaders: bias toward young women and young men in leadership positions (2023), published in Frontiers in Psychology
  • Methodological checklists for improving research quality and reporting consistency (2020), published in Industrial and Organizational Psychology
  • Rebels with a cause? How norm violations shape dominance, prestige, and influence granting (2023), published in PLoS ONE

Astrid C. Homan frequently collaborates with other researchers. Among the most frequent co-authors are Gerben A. van Kleef, Seval Gündemir, Claudia Buengeler, Barbara Nevicka, and Florian Wanders.

Their work has been published multiple times in venues such as the Academy of Management Proceedings, Small Group Research, PLoS ONE, Frontiers in Psychology, and Current Opinion in Psychology.

Best Publications

  • Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda.

    Daan van Knippenberg;Carsten K. W. De Dreu;Astrid C. Homan

  • Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity: diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups.

    Astrid C. Homan;Daan van Knippenberg;Gerben A. Van Kleef;Carsten K. W. De Dreu

  • Facing Differences With an Open Mind: Openness to Experience, Salience of Intragroup Differences, and Performance of Diverse Work Groups

    Astrid C. Homan;John R. Hollenbeck;Stephen E. Humphrey;Daan Van Knippenberg

  • Searing sentiment or cold calculation? The effects of leader emotional displays on team performance depend on follower epistemic motivation

    Gerben A. Van Kleef;Astrid C. Homan;Bianca Beersma;Daan Van Knippenberg

  • Diversity faultlines, shared objectives, and top management team performance

    Daan van Knippenberg;Jeremy F Dawson;Michael A West;Astrid C Homan

  • Diversity mindsets and the performance of diverse teams.

    Daan van Knippenberg;Wendy P. van Ginkel;Astrid C. Homan

  • Transformational leadership sub-dimensions and their link to leaders' personality and performance

    Anika Deinert;Astrid C. Homan;Diana Boer;Sven C. Voelpel

  • Maximizing the Gains and Minimizing the Pains of Diversity: A Policy Perspective

    Adam D. Galinsky;Andrew R. Todd;Astrid C. Homan;Katherine W. Phillips

  • Engaging in Rather than Disengaging from Stress: Effective Coping and Perceived Control

    Maria T. M. Dijkstra;Astrid C. Homan

  • To reflect or not to reflect: Prior team performance as a boundary condition of the effects of reflexivity on learning and final team performance

    Michaéla C. Schippers;Astrid C. Homan;Daan van Knippenberg

  • Emotional influence at work: Take it EASI:

    Gerben A. Van Kleef;Astrid C. Homan;Arik Cheshin

  • On Angry Leaders and Agreeable Followers How Leaders’ Emotions and Followers’ Personalities Shape Motivation and Team Performance

    Gerben A. Van Kleef;Astrid C. Homan;Bianca Beersma;Daan van Knippenberg

  • Breaking the rules to rise to power: How norm violators gain power in the eyes of others

    Gerben A. Van Kleef;Astrid C. Homan;Catrin Finkenauer;Seval Gündemir

  • Believing shapes seeing: The impact of diversity beliefs on the construal of group composition

    Astrid C. Homan;Lindred L. Greer;Karen A. Jehn;Lukas Koning

  • Facing the situation: Testing a biosocial contingency model of leadership in intergroup relations using masculine and feminine faces

    B.R. Spisak;A.C. Homan;A.E. Grabo;M. van Vugt;M. van Vugt

  • Interacting Dimensions of Diversity: Cross-Categorization and the Functioning of Diverse Work Groups.

    Astrid C. Homan;Daan van Knippenberg;Gerben A. Van Kleef;Carsten K. W. De Dreu

  • The social dynamics of breaking the rules: antecedents and consequences of norm-violating behavior

    Gerben A van Kleef;Florian Wanders;Eftychia Stamkou;Astrid C Homan

  • The interplay of diversity training and diversity beliefs on team creativity in nationality diverse teams.

    Astrid C. Homan;Claudia Buengeler;Robert A. Eckhoff;Wendy P. van Ginkel

  • Think leader, think white? Capturing and weakening an implicit pro-white leadership bias

    Seval Gündemir;Astrid C. Homan;Carsten K. W. de Dreu;Mark van Vugt

  • Considering diversity: The positive effects of considerate leadership in diverse teams:

    Astrid C. Homan;Lindred L. Greer

Frequent Co-Authors

Gerben A. van Kleef
Gerben A. van Kleef University of Amsterdam
Daan van Knippenberg
Daan van Knippenberg Rice University
Carsten K. W. De Dreu
Carsten K. W. De Dreu University of Groningen
Sven C. Voelpel
Sven C. Voelpel Constructor University
Karen A. Jehn
Karen A. Jehn University of Melbourne
Michele J. Gelfand
Michele J. Gelfand Stanford University
Agneta H. Fischer
Agneta H. Fischer University of Amsterdam
Michaéla C. Schippers
Michaéla C. Schippers Erasmus University Rotterdam
Catrin Finkenauer
Catrin Finkenauer Utrecht University
Adam D. Galinsky
Adam D. Galinsky Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology can open the door to a wide range of fulfilling career options in related fields like social work, counseling, and human services. Many students interested in understanding human behavior also consider best social work degree programs in Alabama or pursue similar programs in their own regions.

Online pathways and flexible formats now make it easier for students to earn credentials. For example, those seeking practical experience and foundational skills should review the best social work degrees in Arkansas since these programs often blend online coursework with field placements.

Students in metropolitan areas have unique opportunities, too. The top social work programs in Columbus and the best social work degrees in Houston are excellent for aspiring professionals interested in diverse, urban communities.

As job demand rises for mental health specialists, case managers, and counselors, choosing a program that fits your career goals is more important than ever. Review your options carefully and consider pathways beyond psychology, such as social work, to broaden your impact and employment prospects.

Best Scientists Citing Astrid C. Homan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles