World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Q. M. Jonathan Wu

Q. M. Jonathan Wu

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
64
Citations
13632
World Ranking
2644
National Ranking
98

Q. M. Jonathan Wu publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Q. M. Jonathan Wu sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 378 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Q. M. Jonathan Wu D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Q. M. Jonathan Wu sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Q. M. Jonathan Wu is affiliated with the University of Windsor in Canada. Their research spans several areas within computer science and engineering, focusing extensively on computer vision, pattern recognition, and artificial intelligence.

The scientist has contributed to multiple papers published in well-known venues. Some of the recent publications include:

  • A Review of Generalized Zero-Shot Learning Methods, 2022, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
  • Underwater Image Co-Enhancement With Correlation Feature Matching and Joint Learning, 2021, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology
  • CASNet: A Cross-Attention Siamese Network for Video Salient Object Detection, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
  • Blockchain-based decentralized reputation system in E-commerce environment, 2021, Future Generation Computer Systems
  • Secret-to-Image Reversible Transformation for Generative Steganography, 2022, IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing

Their work often involves collaboration with recurring co-authors, including:

  • Yimin Yang
  • Zhenxue Chen
  • Zhili Zhou
  • Wandong Zhang
  • Hui Zhang

Q. M. Jonathan Wu's frequent publication venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Neurocomputing
  • IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics
  • IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology

The main research fields covered by this scientist are:

  • Computer Science
  • Engineering

Within these broad fields, their work touches on multiple subfields:

  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Aerospace Engineering
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Signal Processing

The main topics reflected in their research publications include:

  • Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Machine Learning and ELM
  • Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
  • Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques

Best Publications

  • Directive Contrast Based Multimodal Medical Image Fusion in NSCT Domain

    Gaurav Bhatnagar;Q. M. Jonathan Wu;Zheng Liu

  • Image segmentation by generalized hierarchical fuzzy C-means algorithm

    Yuhui Zheng;Byeungwoo Jeon;Danhua Xu;Q.M. Jonathan Wu

  • Effective and Efficient Global Context Verification for Image Copy Detection

    Zhili Zhou;Yunlong Wang;Q. M. Jonathan Wu;Ching-Nung Yang

  • Human face recognition based on multidimensional PCA and extreme learning machine

    A. A. Mohammed;R. Minhas;Q. M. Jonathan Wu;M. A. Sid-Ahmed

  • Local Mesh Patterns Versus Local Binary Patterns: Biomedical Image Indexing and Retrieval

    Subrahmanyam Murala;Q. M. Jonathan Wu

  • Local ternary co-occurrence patterns: A new feature descriptor for MRI and CT image retrieval

    Subrahmanyam Murala;Q. M. Jonathan Wu

  • Fast and Robust Spatially Constrained Gaussian Mixture Model for Image Segmentation

    Thanh Minh Nguyen;Q. M. Jonathan Wu

  • A new contrast based multimodal medical image fusion framework

    Gaurav Bhatnagar;Q.M. Jonathan Wu;Zheng Liu

  • Coverless image steganography using partial-duplicate image retrieval

    Zhili Zhou;Yan Mu;Q. M. Jonathan Wu

  • Multilevel Framework to Detect and Handle Vehicle Occlusion

    Wei Zhang;Q.M.J. Wu;Xiaokang Yang;Xiangzhong Fang

  • Automatic Visual Detection System of Railway Surface Defects With Curvature Filter and Improved Gaussian Mixture Model

    Hui Zhang;Xiating Jin;Q. M. Jonathan Wu;Yaonan Wang

  • Affine Legendre Moment Invariants for Image Watermarking Robust to Geometric Distortions

    Hui Zhang;Huazhong Shu;G. Coatrieux;Jie Zhu

  • Human action recognition using extreme learning machine based on visual vocabularies

    Rashid Minhas;Aryaz Baradarani;Sepideh Seifzadeh;Q. M. Jonathan Wu

  • Curvelet based face recognition via dimension reduction

    Tanaya Mandal;Q. M. Jonathan Wu;Yuan Yuan

  • A survey of local feature methods for 3D face recognition

    Sima Soltanpour;Boubakeur Boufama;Q.M. Jonathan Wu

  • Low-resolution face recognition: a review

    Zhifei Wang;Zhenjiang Miao;Q. M. Jonathan Wu;Yanli Wan

  • Discrete fractional wavelet transform and its application to multiple encryption

    Gaurav Bhatnagar;Q.M. Jonathan Wu;Balasubramanian Raman

  • Underwater Image Co-Enhancement with Correlation Feature Matching and Joint Learning

    Qi Qi;Yongchang Zhang;Fei Tian;Q. M. Jonathan Wu

  • Human visual system inspired multi-modal medical image fusion framework

    Gaurav Bhatnagar;Q. M. Jonathan Wu;Zheng Liu

  • Moving Cast Shadows Detection Using Ratio Edge

    Wei Zhang;Xiang Zhong Fang;X.K. Yang;Q.M.J. Wu

  • Effective and Efficient Image Copy Detection with Resistance to Arbitrary Rotation

    Zhili Zhou;Ching-Nung Yang;Beijing Chen;Xingming Sun

  • Investigating the Performance of Naive- Bayes Classifiers and K- Nearest Neighbor Classifiers

    Mohammed J. Islam;Q. M. Jonathan Wu;Majid Ahmadi;Maher A. Sid-Ahmed

Frequent Co-Authors

Xingming Sun
Xingming Sun Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology
Yaonan Wang
Yaonan Wang Hunan University
Subrahmanyam Murala
Subrahmanyam Murala Indian Institute of Technology Ropar
Balasubramanian Raman
Balasubramanian Raman Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee
Mehrdad Saif
Mehrdad Saif University of Windsor
Tommy W. S. Chow
Tommy W. S. Chow City University of Hong Kong
Ching-Nung Yang
Ching-Nung Yang National Dong Hwa University
Bao-Liang Lu
Bao-Liang Lu Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Zheng Liu
Zheng Liu University of British Columbia
Majid Ahmadi
Majid Ahmadi University of Windsor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education can open up a variety of pathways beyond traditional computer science degrees. For students seeking to enter the workforce quickly, choosing an accelerated cs degree program offers a faster route to graduation and the start of your career. These programs are designed for motivated learners interested in intensive, fast-paced studies.

If you’re concerned about cost, there are several budget-friendly options available. For example, pursuing the cheapest online environmental science degree or considering mechanical engineering cost of education can help students manage their educational expenses while expanding career options in engineering.

Additionally, a bachelor of science in physics online can be an excellent choice for those interested in analytical problem-solving and research. With so many affordable, flexible online degree programs in STEM fields, students now have more opportunities than ever to customize their education and launch a rewarding career in technology, engineering, or science.

Best Scientists Citing Q. M. Jonathan Wu

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles