World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael Bang Petersen

Michael Bang Petersen

Award Badge
Political Science
Denmark
2026
Award Badge
Law and Political Science
Denmark
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 53 4827 4473 16 16 188 10271
Political Science 54 177 154 3 3 242 10626

Michael Bang Petersen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael Bang Petersen between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael Bang Petersen published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 20.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 96 publications in 2020. 29 of the 397 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 96. Peak 96 publications in 2020. 2007: 3 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 21 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 38 publications 2020: 96 publications 2021: 43 publications 2022: 37 publications 2023: 23 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 14 publications
2007 2025

397 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael Bang Petersen: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 3
2008 2
2009 4
2010 4
2011 9
2012 16
2013 13
2014 17
2015 21
2016 11
2017 17
2018 14
2019 38
2020 96
2021 43
2022 37
2023 23
2024 15
2025 14
Total 397
Download as CSV

Michael Bang Petersen publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Bang Petersen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 333+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 97. Most scientists, 97, have 333+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 241–245 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36–40 publications 333+

This scientist: 242 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 10
41–45 11
46–50 25
51–55 27
56–60 44
61–65 52
66–70 62
71–75 62
76–80 79
81–85 71
86–90 82
91–95 65
96–100 85
101–105 76
106–110 66
111–115 78
116–120 67
121–125 73
126–130 73
131–135 64
136–140 45
141–145 53
146–150 44
151–155 45
156–160 33
161–165 32
166–170 28
171–175 31
176–180 29
181–185 27
186–190 36
191–195 27
196–200 24
201–205 16
206–210 16
211–215 19
216–220 16
221–225 17
226–230 18
231–235 23
236–240 17
241–245 13 242
246–250 17
251–255 9
256–260 13
261–265 8
266–270 12
271–275 8
276–280 10
281–285 13
286–290 13
291–295 5
296–300 6
301–305 11
306–310 9
311–315 6
316–320 4
321–325 4
326–330 2
331–332 5
333+ 97
Download as CSV

Michael Bang Petersen D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Bang Petersen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 43 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 62+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 62+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 76
21 79
22 84
23 68
24 88
25 82
26 76
27 75
28 99
29 96
30 96
31 81
32 86
33 81
34 84
35 72
36 58
37 53
38 48
39 40
40 40
41 32
42 26
43 25
44 33
45 33
46 17
47 21
48 22
49 18
50 19
51 19
52 15
53 14
54 10 54
55 13
56 9
57 11
58 12
59 10
60 5
61 7
62+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Political Science in Denmark Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Political Science in Denmark Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Law and Political Science in Denmark Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Law and Political Science in Denmark Leader Award

Overview

Michael Bang Petersen is affiliated with Aarhus University in Denmark and works primarily within the Social Sciences. Their research spans multiple subfields, notably Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Communication, and Clinical Psychology.

The main topics addressed in their work include the Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment, Misinformation and Its Impacts, Social and Intergroup Psychology, Social Media and Politics, Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy, Cultural Differences and Values, and COVID-19 and Mental Health.

Michael Bang Petersen's recent scholarly output includes several publications with notable impact. These papers are:

  • The Emotional Path to Action: Empathy Promotes Physical Distancing and Wearing of Face Masks During the COVID-19 Pandemic (2020), Psychological Science
  • Partisan Polarization Is the Primary Psychological Motivation behind Political Fake News Sharing on Twitter (2021), American Political Science Review
  • Public acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines: cross-national evidence on levels and individual-level predictors using observational data (2021), BMJ Open
  • National identity predicts public health support during a global pandemic (2022), Nature Communications
  • Compliance without fear: Individual-level protective behaviour during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (2021), British Journal of Health Psychology

Their frequent coauthors include Lene Aarøe, Alexander Bor, Kevin Arceneaux, Frederik Juhl Jørgensen, and Troels Bøggild.

Publication venues where Michael Bang Petersen's research often appears include Harvard Dataverse, PLoS ONE, American Political Science Review, Politica, and Psychological Science.

Best Publications

  • Social Welfare as Small‐Scale Help: Evolutionary Psychology and the Deservingness Heuristic

    Michael Bang Petersen

  • Deservingness versus values in public opinion on welfare: The automaticity of the deservingness heuristic

    Michael Bang Petersen;Rune Slothuus;Rune Stubager;Lise Togeby

  • Who Deserves Help? Evolutionary Psychology, Social Emotions, and Public Opinion about Welfare

    Michael Bang Petersen;Daniel Sznycer;Leda Cosmides;John Tooby

  • Partisan Polarization Is the Primary Psychological Motivation behind Political Fake News Sharing on Twitter

    Mathias Osmundsen;Alexander Bor;Peter Bjerregaard Vahlstrup;Anja Bechmann

  • National identity predicts public health support during a global pandemic

    Unknown

  • Parasite stress and pathogen avoidance relate to distinct dimensions of political ideology across 30 nations

    Joshua M. Tybur;Yoel Inbar;Lene Aarøe;Pat Barclay

  • The Behavioral Immune System Shapes Political Intuitions: Why and How Individual Differences in Disgust Sensitivity Underlie Opposition to Immigration

    Lene Aarøe;Michael Bang Petersen;Kevin Arceneaux

  • Motivated Reasoning and Political Parties: Evidence for Increased Processing in the Face of Party Cues

    Michael Bang Petersen;Martin Skov;Martin Skov;Søren Serritzlew;Thomas Ramsøy;Thomas Ramsøy

  • The Ancestral Logic of Politics Upper-Body Strength Regulates Men’s Assertion of Self-Interest Over Economic Redistribution

    Michael Bang Petersen;Daniel Sznycer;Aaron Nathaniel Sell;Aaron Nathaniel Sell;Leda Cosmides

  • The Deservingness Heuristic and the Politics of Health Care

    Carsten Jensen;Michael Bang Petersen

  • Crowding Out Culture: Scandinavians and Americans Agree on Social Welfare in the Face of Deservingness Cues

    Lene Aarøe;Michael Bang Petersen

  • Public acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines: cross-national evidence on levels and individual-level predictors using observational data.

    Marie Fly Lindholt;Frederik Juhl Jørgensen;Alexander Bor;Michael Bang Petersen

  • The naturalness of (many) social institutions: evolved cognition as their foundation

    Pascal Boyer;Michael Bang Petersen

  • Will the COVID-19 pandemic worsen the obesity epidemic?

    Christoffer Clemmensen;Michael Bang Petersen;Thorkild I A Sørensen

  • Detecting affiliation in colaughter across 24 societies

    Gregory A. Bryant;Daniel M. T. Fessler;Riccardo Fusaroli;Edward Clint

  • Perceived Conflict and Leader Dominance: Individual and Contextual Factors Behind Preferences for Dominant Leaders

    Lasse Laustsen;Michael Bang Petersen

  • Distinct Emotions, Distinct Domains: Anger, Anxiety and Perceptions of Intentionality

    Michael Bang Petersen

  • Evolutionary Political Psychology: On the Origin and Structure of Heuristics and Biases in Politics

    Michael Bang Petersen

  • Constituents of political cognition: Race, party politics, and the alliance detection system

    David Pietraszewski;Oliver Scott Curry;Michael Bang Petersen;Leda Cosmides

  • Transparent communication about negative features of COVID-19 vaccines decreases acceptance but increases trust.

    Michael Bang Petersen;Alexander Bor;Frederik Juhl Jørgensen;Marie Fly Lindholt

  • Hunger Games: Fluctuations in Blood Glucose Levels Influence Social Welfare Support

    Lene Aarøe;Michael Bang Petersen

Frequent Co-Authors

Rune Slothuus
Rune Slothuus Aarhus University
Paul M. Sniderman
Paul M. Sniderman Stanford University
Leda Cosmides
Leda Cosmides University of California, Santa Barbara
John Tooby
John Tooby University of California, Santa Barbara
Kevin Arceneaux
Kevin Arceneaux Sciences Po
Stefan Stieger
Stefan Stieger Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences
Pascal Boyer
Pascal Boyer Washington University in St. Louis
Norman P. Li
Norman P. Li Singapore Management University
Tatsuya Kameda
Tatsuya Kameda Meiji Gakuin University
Wesley K. Thompson
Wesley K. Thompson University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Political Science opens the door to many interconnected academic and career paths. For those looking to combine political science with other fields, pursuing an affordable interdisciplinary studies degree online can lead to a versatile skill set. These programs blend political knowledge with areas like economics, communication, or sociology.

If you're passionate about researching historical trends that influence political systems, a master's in history is a natural progression. Many universities now offer master's in history programs through online platforms, offering flexibility and affordability for working professionals.

For those aiming for quicker entry into the workforce or seeking to upskill, earning one of the fastest certifications to get can provide specialized credentials with strong salary potential. These certifications often take less time than a traditional degree and can enhance your resume in a competitive job market.

Additionally, if advancing your education is a priority but time is limited, consider the shortest masters programs available online. These programs allow you to gain advanced knowledge and leadership skills in under two years, making them ideal for professionals seeking swift career advancement.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Bang Petersen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles