World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Rune Slothuus

Rune Slothuus

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Political Science 21 1882 1734 36 36 75 4987

Rune Slothuus publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rune Slothuus between 2003 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rune Slothuus published across 21 years, from 2003 to 2023, averaging 5.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 36 publications in 2018. 1 of the 115 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 36. Peak 36 publications in 2018. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 6 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 4 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 11 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 36 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 32 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication
2003 2023

115 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rune Slothuus: publications per year, 2003 to 2023
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 1
2005 0
2006 1
2007 6
2008 2
2009 1
2010 4
2011 3
2012 4
2013 1
2014 11
2015 0
2016 2
2017 4
2018 36
2019 2
2020 32
2021 3
2022 0
2023 1
Total 115
Download as CSV

Rune Slothuus publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rune Slothuus sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 333+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 97. Most scientists, 97, have 333+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 71–75 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36–40 publications 333+

This scientist: 75 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 10
41–45 11
46–50 25
51–55 27
56–60 44
61–65 52
66–70 62
71–75 62 75
76–80 79
81–85 71
86–90 82
91–95 65
96–100 85
101–105 76
106–110 66
111–115 78
116–120 67
121–125 73
126–130 73
131–135 64
136–140 45
141–145 53
146–150 44
151–155 45
156–160 33
161–165 32
166–170 28
171–175 31
176–180 29
181–185 27
186–190 36
191–195 27
196–200 24
201–205 16
206–210 16
211–215 19
216–220 16
221–225 17
226–230 18
231–235 23
236–240 17
241–245 13
246–250 17
251–255 9
256–260 13
261–265 8
266–270 12
271–275 8
276–280 10
281–285 13
286–290 13
291–295 5
296–300 6
301–305 11
306–310 9
311–315 6
316–320 4
321–325 4
326–330 2
331–332 5
333+ 97
Download as CSV

Rune Slothuus D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rune Slothuus sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 43 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 62+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 62+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 21 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 21 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 76
21 79 21
22 84
23 68
24 88
25 82
26 76
27 75
28 99
29 96
30 96
31 81
32 86
33 81
34 84
35 72
36 58
37 53
38 48
39 40
40 40
41 32
42 26
43 25
44 33
45 33
46 17
47 21
48 22
49 18
50 19
51 19
52 15
53 14
54 10
55 13
56 9
57 11
58 12
59 10
60 5
61 7
62+ 100
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Issue Framing Effects

    Rune Slothuus;Claes H. de Vreese

  • Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Public Opinion Formation

    Thomas J. Leeper;Rune Slothuus

  • The crisis of democracy and the science of deliberation.

    John S. Dryzek;André Bächtiger;Simone Chambers;Joshua Cohen

  • Deservingness versus values in public opinion on welfare: The automaticity of the deservingness heuristic

    Michael Bang Petersen;Rune Slothuus;Rune Stubager;Lise Togeby

  • More Than Weighting Cognitive Importance: A Dual‐Process Model of Issue Framing Effects

    Rune Slothuus

  • Issue Importance as a Moderator of Framing Effects

    Sophie Lecheler;Claes H. de Vreese;Rune Slothuus

  • Partisan Elites as Culprits? How Party Cues Shape Partisan Perceptual Gaps

    Martin Bisgaard;Rune Slothuus

  • Framing Deservingness to Win Support for Welfare State Retrenchment

    Rune Slothuus

  • When Can Political Parties Lead Public Opinion? Evidence from a Natural Experiment

    Rune Slothuus

  • What Are the Sources of Political Parties’ Issue Ownership? Testing Four Explanations at the Individual Level

    Rune Stubager;Rune Slothuus

  • Assessing the Influence of Political Parties on Public Opinion: The Challenge from Pretreatment Effects

    Rune Slothuus

  • Political Parties and Value Consistency in Public Opinion Formation

    Michael Bang Petersen;Rune Slothuus;Lise Togeby

  • How Political Parties Shape Public Opinion in the Real World

    Rune Slothuus;Martin Bisgaard

  • Freedom for All? The Strength and Limits of Political Tolerance

    Michael Petersen;Rune Slothuus;Rune Stubager;Lise Togeby

  • How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation

    James N. Druckman;Rune Slothuus

  • Do voters learn? Evidence that voters respond accurately to changes in political parties’ policy positions

    Henrik Bech Seeberg;Rune Slothuus;Rune Stubager

  • How the News Media Persuades

    Thomas J. Leeper;Rune Slothuus

  • Party over Pocketbook? How Party Cues Influence Opinion When Citizens Have a Stake in Policy

    Rune Slothuus;Martin Bisgaard

  • Paradoxes of Liberal Democracy

    Paul M. Sniderman;Michael Bang Petersen;Rune Slothuus;Rune Stubager

  • Political Taste as a Marker of Class: A Bourdieu Approach to the Study of Public Opinion Formation

    Rune Slothuus

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Bang Petersen
Michael Bang Petersen Aarhus University
Paul M. Sniderman
Paul M. Sniderman Stanford University
James N. Druckman
James N. Druckman University of Rochester
Claes H. de Vreese
Claes H. de Vreese University of Amsterdam
Mark E. Warren
Mark E. Warren University of British Columbia
John S. Dryzek
John S. Dryzek University of Canberra
Jane Mansbridge
Jane Mansbridge Harvard University
Dennis F. Thompson
Dennis F. Thompson Harvard University
Robert Ford
Robert Ford University of Manchester
Archon Fung
Archon Fung Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Rune Slothuus

Recently Published Articles